| Literature DB >> 26490321 |
Letizia Castelli1, Luca Stocchi2, Maurizio Patrignani2, Giovanni Sellitto1, Manuela Giuliani3, Luca Prosperini4.
Abstract
This study was aimed at investigating whether postural sway measures derived from a standard force platform were similar to those generated by a custom-written software ("We-Measure") acquiring and processing data from a commercial Nintendo balance board (BB). For this purpose, 90 patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and 50 healthy controls (HC) were tested in a single-day session with a reference standard force platform and a BB-based system. Despite its acceptable between-device agreement (tested by visual evaluation of Bland-Altman plot), the low-cost BB-based system tended to overestimate postural sway when compared to the reference standard force platform in both MS and HC groups (on average +30% and +54%, respectively). Between-device reliability was just adequate (MS: 66%, HC: 47%), while test-retest reliability was excellent (MS: 84%, HC: 88%). Concurrent validity evaluation showed similar performance between the reference standard force platform and the BB-based system in discriminating fallers and non-fallers among patients with MS. All these findings may encourage the use of this balance board-based new device in longitudinal study, rather than in cross-sectional design, thus providing a potential useful tool for multicenter settings.Entities:
Keywords: Balance board; Force platform; Multiple sclerosis; Static posturography; Wii
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26490321 DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2015.10.016
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neurol Sci ISSN: 0022-510X Impact factor: 3.181