Literature DB >> 26490170

Speeding up chromosome evolution in Phaseolus: multiple rearrangements associated with a one-step descending dysploidy.

Artur Fonsêca1, Maria Eduarda Ferraz1, Andrea Pedrosa-Harand2.   

Abstract

The genus Phaseolus L. has been subject of extensive cytogenetic studies due to its global economic importance. It is considered karyotypically stable, with most of its ca. 75 species having 2n = 22 chromosomes, and only three species (Phaseolus leptostachyus, Phaseolus macvaughii, and Phaseolus micranthus), which form the Leptostachyus clade, having 2n = 20. To test whether a simple chromosomal fusion was the cause of this descending dysploidy, mitotic chromosomes of P. leptostachyus (2n = 20) were comparatively mapped by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) using bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs) and ribosomal DNA (rDNA) probes. Our results corroborated the conservation of the 5S and 45S rDNA sites on ancestral chromosomes 10 and 6, respectively. The reduction from x = 11 to x = 10 was the result of the insertion of chromosome 10 into the centromeric region of chromosome 11, supporting a nested chromosome fusion (NCF) as the main cause of this dysploidy. Additionally, the terminal region of the long arm of chromosome 6 was translocated to this larger chromosome. Surprisingly, the NCF was accompanied by several additional translocations and inversions previously unknown for the genus, suggesting that the dysploidy may have been associated to a burst of genome reorganization in this otherwise stable, diploid plant genus.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BAC-FISH; Fabaceae; Nested chromosome fusion (NCF); Phaseolus leptostachyus

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26490170     DOI: 10.1007/s00412-015-0548-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosoma        ISSN: 0009-5915            Impact factor:   4.316


  33 in total

1.  Ancestral grass karyotype reconstruction unravels new mechanisms of genome shuffling as a source of plant evolution.

Authors:  Florent Murat; Jian-Hong Xu; Eric Tannier; Michael Abrouk; Nicolas Guilhot; Caroline Pont; Joachim Messing; Jérôme Salse
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Cytogenetic mapping of common bean chromosomes reveals a less compartmentalized small-genome plant species.

Authors:  Andrea Pedrosa-Harand; James Kami; Paul Gepts; Valérie Geffroy; Dieter Schweizer
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2009-03-28       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 3.  Natural pathways to polyploidy in plants and consequences for genome reorganization.

Authors:  A Tayalé; C Parisod
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2013-06-08       Impact factor: 1.636

4.  Genomic instability in rat: breakpoints induced by ionising radiation and interstitial telomeric-like sequences.

Authors:  Núiria Camats; Aurora Ruiz-Herrera; Juan José Parrilla; Maribel Acien; Pilar Payá; Elena Giulotto; Josep Egozcue; Francisca García; Montserrat Garcia
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 5.  Chromosomal aberrations involving telomeres and interstitial telomeric sequences.

Authors:  Alejandro D Bolzán
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 3.000

6.  Interpretation of karyotype evolution should consider chromosome structural constraints.

Authors:  Ingo Schubert; Martin A Lysak
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 11.639

7.  Ribosomal transcription units integrated via T-DNA transformation associate with the nucleolus and do not require upstream repeat sequences for activity in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  E M Wanzenböck; C Schöfer; D Schweizer; A Bachmair
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 6.417

8.  Karyotype stability in the genus Phaseolus evidenced by the comparative mapping of the wild species Phaseolus microcarpus.

Authors:  Artur Fonsêca; Andrea Pedrosa-Harand
Journal:  Genome       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 2.166

9.  Karyotype reorganisation in the subtilis group of birch mice (Rodentia, Dipodidae, Sicista): unexpected taxonomic diversity within a limited distribution.

Authors:  Y M Kovalskaya; V M Aniskin; P L Bogomolov; A V Surov; I A Tikhonov; G N Tikhonova; T J Robinson; V T Volobouev
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 1.636

10.  Mechanisms of chromosome number reduction in Arabidopsis thaliana and related Brassicaceae species.

Authors:  Martin A Lysak; Alexandre Berr; Ales Pecinka; Renate Schmidt; Kim McBreen; Ingo Schubert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  14 in total

1.  Comparative cytogenomics reveals genome reshuffling and centromere repositioning in the legume tribe Phaseoleae.

Authors:  Claudio Montenegro; Lívia do Vale Martins; Fernanda de Oliveira Bustamante; Ana Christina Brasileiro-Vidal; Andrea Pedrosa-Harand
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 2.  Celebrating Mendel, McClintock, and Darlington: On end-to-end chromosome fusions and nested chromosome fusions.

Authors:  Martin A Lysak
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 12.085

3.  Evolutionary dynamics of satellite DNA repeats from Phaseolus beans.

Authors:  Tiago Ribeiro; Karla G B Dos Santos; Manon M S Richard; Mireille Sévignac; Vincent Thareau; Valérie Geffroy; Andrea Pedrosa-Harand
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 3.356

4.  Breaks of macrosynteny and collinearity among moth bean (Vigna aconitifolia), cowpea (V. unguiculata), and common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris).

Authors:  Ana Rafaela da S Oliveira; Lívia do Vale Martins; Fernanda de O Bustamante; María Muñoz-Amatriaín; Timothy Close; Antônio F da Costa; Ana Maria Benko-Iseppon; Andrea Pedrosa-Harand; Ana Christina Brasileiro-Vidal
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 5.239

5.  BAC- and oligo-FISH mapping reveals chromosome evolution among Vigna angularis, V. unguiculata, and Phaseolus vulgaris.

Authors:  Lívia do Vale Martins; Fernanda de Oliveira Bustamante; Ana Rafaela da Silva Oliveira; Antônio Félix da Costa; Lidiane de Lima Feitoza; Qihua Liang; Hainan Zhao; Ana Maria Benko-Iseppon; María Muñoz-Amatriaín; Andrea Pedrosa-Harand; Jiming Jiang; Ana Christina Brasileiro-Vidal
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 4.316

6.  Oligo-FISH barcode in beans: a new chromosome identification system.

Authors:  Fernanda de Oliveira Bustamante; Thiago Henrique do Nascimento; Claudio Montenegro; Sibelle Dias; Lívia do Vale Martins; Guilherme Tomaz Braz; Ana Maria Benko-Iseppon; Jiming Jiang; Andrea Pedrosa-Harand; Ana Christina Brasileiro-Vidal
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2021-08-08       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  A First Glimpse of Wild Lupin Karyotype Variation As Revealed by Comparative Cytogenetic Mapping.

Authors:  Karolina Susek; Wojciech K Bielski; Robert Hasterok; Barbara Naganowska; Bogdan Wolko
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  FISH-based mitotic and meiotic diakinesis karyotypes of Morus notabilis reveal a chromosomal fusion-fission cycle between mitotic and meiotic phases.

Authors:  Yahui Xuan; Chaoshuo Li; Yue Wu; Bi Ma; Ruiling Liu; Zhonghuai Xiang; Ningjia He
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Karyotype heterogeneity in Philodendron s.l. (Araceae) revealed by chromosome mapping of rDNA loci.

Authors:  Emanuelle Varão Vasconcelos; Santelmo Vasconcelos; Tiago Ribeiro; Ana Maria Benko-Iseppon; Ana Christina Brasileiro-Vidal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Chromosome identification and reconstruction of evolutionary rearrangements in Brachypodium distachyon, B. stacei and B. hybridum.

Authors:  Joanna Lusinska; Joanna Majka; Alexander Betekhtin; Karolina Susek; Elzbieta Wolny; Robert Hasterok
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 4.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.