Dorota Kaleta1, Adam Fronczak2, Bukola Usidame3, Elżbieta Dziankowska-Zaborszczyk4, Teresa Makowiec-Dąbrowska5, Piotr Wojtysiak6. 1. Medical University of Lodz, Łódź, Poland (Department of Preventive Medicine). dkaleta@op.pl. 2. Medical University of Lodz, Łódź, Poland (Department of Preventive Medicine). adam.fronczak@umed.lodz.pl. 3. University of Massachusetts, Boston, USA (Department of Public Policy). bukolau@yahoo.co.uk. 4. Medical University of Lodz, Łódź, Poland (Department of Social and Preventive Medicine). elzbieta.dziankowska-zaborszczyk@umed.lodz.pl. 5. Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Łódź, Poland (Department of Work Physiology and Ergonomics). tmd@imp.lodz.pl. 6. County Office, Piotrków Trybunalski, Poland. pwojtysiak@wp.pl.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) constitutes a threat to the health of many people. In order to diminish ETS exposure, countries (including Poland) implemented legal restrictions of smoking in public places and worksites. Currently more attention is also paid to reduce overall and residential ETS exposure by voluntary smoke-free home policy adoption. The aim of current analysis was to evaluate the prevalence and determinants of implementing smoking bans at place of residence among economically active males and females in Poland. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data from cross-sectional, household study - Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS 2009-2010) were analyzed. The logistic regression model was applied for appropriate calculations. RESULTS: Out of 3696 studied subjects only 37.1% adopted total smoking ban within the home. Decreased likelihood of adopting total smoking bans was associated with current smoker status, low education attainment, lack of awareness on adverse health consequences of ETS, low level of support for tobacco control policies, and cohabitation with a smoker in both genders. Having smoke-free homes was also linked with age in women, place of residence and work smoking policy in indoor areas in men. CONCLUSIONS: Targeted activities to encourage adopting voluntary smoke-free rules among groups least likely to implement 100% smoking bans in the home and activities to decrease social acceptance of smoking in the presence of nonsmokers, children, pregnant woman are urgently needed. This work is available in Open Access model and licensed under a CC BY-NC 3.0 PL license.
OBJECTIVES: Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) constitutes a threat to the health of many people. In order to diminish ETS exposure, countries (including Poland) implemented legal restrictions of smoking in public places and worksites. Currently more attention is also paid to reduce overall and residential ETS exposure by voluntary smoke-free home policy adoption. The aim of current analysis was to evaluate the prevalence and determinants of implementing smoking bans at place of residence among economically active males and females in Poland. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data from cross-sectional, household study - Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS 2009-2010) were analyzed. The logistic regression model was applied for appropriate calculations. RESULTS: Out of 3696 studied subjects only 37.1% adopted total smoking ban within the home. Decreased likelihood of adopting total smoking bans was associated with current smoker status, low education attainment, lack of awareness on adverse health consequences of ETS, low level of support for tobacco control policies, and cohabitation with a smoker in both genders. Having smoke-free homes was also linked with age in women, place of residence and work smoking policy in indoor areas in men. CONCLUSIONS: Targeted activities to encourage adopting voluntary smoke-free rules among groups least likely to implement 100% smoking bans in the home and activities to decrease social acceptance of smoking in the presence of nonsmokers, children, pregnant woman are urgently needed. This work is available in Open Access model and licensed under a CC BY-NC 3.0 PL license.
Authors: Krzysztof Buczkowski; Małgorzata A Basinska; Anna Ratajska; Katarzyna Lewandowska; Dorota Luszkiewicz; Alicja Sieminska Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2017-01-27 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Katarzyna Milcarz; Teresa Makowiec-Dąbrowska; Leokadia Bak-Romaniszyn; Dorota Kaleta Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2017-01-27 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Mateusz Jankowski; Jarosław Pinkas; Wojciech S Zgliczyński; Dorota Kaleta; Waldemar Wierzba; Mariusz Gujski; Vaughan W Rees Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-10-15 Impact factor: 3.390