J M de Miguel-Yanes1, M Méndez-Bailón2, R Jiménez-García3, V Hernández-Barrera4, N Pérez-Farinós5, A López-de-Andrés6. 1. Internal Medicine Department, Hospital General Universitario "Gregorio Marañón", 46, Doctor Esquerdo, 28007 Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: josemaria.demiguel@salud.madrid.org. 2. Internal Medicine Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Calle Profesor Martín Lagos s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: manuel.mendez@salud.madrid.org. 3. Preventive Medicine and Public Health Department, Health Sciences Faculty, Rey Juan Carlos University, Avenida de Atenas s/n, 28292 Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: rodrigo.jimenez@urjc.es. 4. Preventive Medicine and Public Health Department, Health Sciences Faculty, Rey Juan Carlos University, Avenida de Atenas s/n, 28292 Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: valentin.hernandez@urjc.es. 5. Spanish Agency of Alimentary Safety and Nutrition, Ministry of Health, Social Policy and Equality, 56, Alcalá, 28071 Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: pereznapo@gmail.com. 6. Preventive Medicine and Public Health Department, Health Sciences Faculty, Rey Juan Carlos University, Avenida de Atenas s/n, 28292 Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: ana.lopez@urjc.es.
Abstract
AIMS: There is conflicting evidence on how type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) influences in-hospital mortality (IHM) in sepsis. We aimed to compare trends in outcomes for sepsis in people with or without T2DM in Spain between 2008 and 2012. METHODS: We identified all cases with any sepsis diagnosis using national hospital discharge data. We evaluated annual incidence rates for sepsis stratified by T2DM status. We calculated IHM and analyzed trends over time. In a multivariate analysis including potential confounding factors, we tested T2DM as an independent factor for IHM. RESULTS: Overall, 217,280 cases of any-stage sepsis were diagnosed, of whom 50,611 (23.3%) had T2DM. The annual incidence of sepsis increased during the 5-year period (from 76.5 to 113.3cases/10(5) population). The incidence increase was higher for the population with T2DM (from 16.8 to 27.1 cases/10(5) population; 61.3% relative increment). People with T2DM were significantly older (75.8 ± 11.2 years vs. 71.0 ± 16.4 years) and suffered from more coexisting medical conditions. In the univariate analysis, mortality was higher for the population with T2DM only when septic shock was present (53.3% vs. 51.9%; P=0.002). IHM decreased over time both in participants with (from 45.7% to 38.1%) and without T2DM (from 46.1% to 39.5%). After accounting for all other potential confounders, T2DM was significantly associated with a lower IHM (odds ratio=0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.90). CONCLUSIONS: In Spain, the annual increase in sepsis incidence was higher in people with T2DM, but the risk of dying with sepsis during admission was moderately lower in people with T2DM.
AIMS: There is conflicting evidence on how type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) influences in-hospital mortality (IHM) in sepsis. We aimed to compare trends in outcomes for sepsis in people with or without T2DM in Spain between 2008 and 2012. METHODS: We identified all cases with any sepsis diagnosis using national hospital discharge data. We evaluated annual incidence rates for sepsis stratified by T2DM status. We calculated IHM and analyzed trends over time. In a multivariate analysis including potential confounding factors, we tested T2DM as an independent factor for IHM. RESULTS: Overall, 217,280 cases of any-stage sepsis were diagnosed, of whom 50,611 (23.3%) had T2DM. The annual incidence of sepsis increased during the 5-year period (from 76.5 to 113.3cases/10(5) population). The incidence increase was higher for the population with T2DM (from 16.8 to 27.1 cases/10(5) population; 61.3% relative increment). People with T2DM were significantly older (75.8 ± 11.2 years vs. 71.0 ± 16.4 years) and suffered from more coexisting medical conditions. In the univariate analysis, mortality was higher for the population with T2DM only when septic shock was present (53.3% vs. 51.9%; P=0.002). IHM decreased over time both in participants with (from 45.7% to 38.1%) and without T2DM (from 46.1% to 39.5%). After accounting for all other potential confounders, T2DM was significantly associated with a lower IHM (odds ratio=0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.90). CONCLUSIONS: In Spain, the annual increase in sepsis incidence was higher in people with T2DM, but the risk of dying with sepsis during admission was moderately lower in people with T2DM.
Authors: Jessica L Harding; Meda E Pavkov; Dianna J Magliano; Jonathan E Shaw; Edward W Gregg Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2018-08-31 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: C Fleischmann-Struzek; L Mellhammar; N Rose; A Cassini; K E Rudd; P Schlattmann; B Allegranzi; K Reinhart Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2020-06-22 Impact factor: 17.440