Literature DB >> 26489394

Exchange nailing for femoral diaphyseal fracture non-unions: Risk factors for failure.

S T J Tsang1, L A Mills2, J Baren3, J Frantzias3, J F Keating3, A H R W Simpson4.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for failure of exchange nailing for femoral diaphyseal fracture non-unions. The study cohort comprised 40 patients with femoral diaphyseal non-unions treated by exchange nailing, of which six were open injuries. The median time to exchange nailing from primary fixation was 8.4 months. The main outcome measures were union, number of secondary fixation procedures required to achieve union and time to union. Multiple causes for non-union were found in 16 (40%) cases, with infection present in 12 (30.0%) patients. Further surgical procedures were required in nine (22.5%) cases, one of whom (2.5%) required the use of another fixation modality to achieve union. Union was ultimately achieved with exchange nailing in 34/37 (91.9%) patients. The median time to union after the exchange nailing was 9.4 months. Cigarette smoking and infection were risk factors for failure of exchange nailing. Multivariate analysis found infection to be the strongest predictor of exchange failure (p<0.05). Exchange nailing is an effective treatment for aseptic femoral diaphyseal fracture non-union. However, 50% of patients undergoing exchange nailing in the presence of infection required at least one further procedure. It is important to counsel patients of this so that they can plan for it and do not consider that the first exchange operation has failed.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Exchange nailing; Femur; Fracture non-union; Infection

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26489394     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.09.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  5 in total

1.  Osseous Hydatidosis of Femur in a Patient with Fracture Non-union: An Uncommon Entity.

Authors:  Kiruthiga Kala Gnanasekaran; Anne Jennifer Prabhu; Shyjumon George
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-12-01

2.  Nonunion of the femoral shaft associated with limb shortening treated with a combined technique of external fixation over an intramedullary nail versus the Ilizarov method.

Authors:  D Y Borzunov; S N Kolchin
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 2.928

3.  Traction table versus double reverse traction repositor in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures.

Authors:  Ruipeng Zhang; Yingchao Yin; Shilun Li; Lin Jin; Zhiyong Hou; Yingze Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Uniting the un-united: should established non-unions of femoral shaft fractures initially treated with IM nails be treated by plate augmentation instead of exchange IM nailing? A systematic review.

Authors:  Gareth Medlock; Iain M Stevenson; Alan J Johnstone
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2018-11-13

5.  Systematic review of dynamization vs exchange nailing for delayed/non-union femoral fractures.

Authors:  Jacob E Vaughn; Ronit V Shah; Tarek Samman; Jacob Stirton; Jiayong Liu; Nabil A Ebraheim
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2018-07-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.