| Literature DB >> 26489365 |
Liliana Chiorean1, Richard G Barr2, Barbara Braden3, Christian Jenssen4, Xin-Wu Cui5, Michael Hocke6, Andreas Schuler7, Christoph F Dietrich8.
Abstract
Distinguishing malignant versus benign lymphadenopathies is a major diagnostic dilemma in clinical medicine. Metastatic deposits in normal-sized lymph nodes (LNs) can be smaller than a millimeter, thus presenting a diagnostic challenge. In most clinical settings, however, enlarged LNs detected on imaging need to be classified as malignant or benign. Ultrasound seems to be a very reliable method for LN characterization because of the high resolution, especially in the subcutaneous areas. However, B-mode and Doppler-ultrasound criteria for characterization of a lymphadenopathy as benign or malignant are lacking specificity. Newer methods such as elastography seem to be valuable for identifying metastatic deposits within LNs and may help discriminate malignant and benign LNs. This review summarizes the different elastographic methods available and provides an overview of the relevant publications. According to the literature, elastography can be used for identifying metastatic deposits, to guide fine needle aspiration and to non-invasively choose the most suspicious LN of a group of enlarged LNs for targeted biopsy.Entities:
Keywords: Elastography; Imaging; Lymph node; Shear wave elastography; Staging; Strain; Ultrasound
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26489365 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.09.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol ISSN: 0301-5629 Impact factor: 2.998