Literature DB >> 26489213

Developmental improvement and age-related decline in unfamiliar face matching.

Ahmed M Megreya, Markus Bindemann.   

Abstract

Age-related changes have been documented widely in studies of face recognition and eyewitness identification. However, it is not clear whether these changes arise from general developmental differences in memory or occur specifically during the perceptual processing of faces. We report two experiments to track such perceptual changes using a 1-in- 10 (experiment 1) and 1-in-1 (experiment 2) matching task for unfamiliar faces. Both experiments showed improvements in face matching during childhood and adult-like accuracy levels by adolescence. In addition, face-matching performance declined in adults of the age of 65 years. These findings indicate that developmental improvements and aging-related differences in face processing arise from changes in the perceptual encoding of faces. A clear face inversion effect was also present in all age groups. This indicates that those age-related changes in face matching reflect a quantitative effect, whereby typical face processes are engaged but do not operate at the best-possible level. These data suggest that part of the problem of eyewitness identification in children and elderly persons might reflect impairments in the perceptual processing of unfamiliar faces.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26489213     DOI: 10.1068/p7825

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  14 in total

1.  Face matching in a long task: enforced rest and desk-switching cannot maintain identification accuracy.

Authors:  Hamood M Alenezi; Markus Bindemann; Matthew C Fysh; Robert A Johnston
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 2.984

2.  The 20 item prosopagnosia index (PI20): relationship with the Glasgow face-matching test.

Authors:  Punit Shah; Sophie Sowden; Anne Gaule; Caroline Catmur; Geoffrey Bird
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 2.963

3.  Declines in representational quality and strategic retrieval processes contribute to age-related increases in false recognition.

Authors:  Alexandra N Trelle; Richard N Henson; Deborah A E Green; Jon S Simons
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Feature-by-feature comparison and holistic processing in unfamiliar face matching.

Authors:  Ahmed M Megreya
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Development of Holistic Face Processing From Childhood and Adolescence to Young Adulthood in Chinese Individuals.

Authors:  Yini Sun; Qinglan Li; Xiaohua Cao
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-04-09

6.  Bayesian regression-based developmental norms for the Benton Facial Recognition Test in males and females.

Authors:  Leah A L Wang; John D Herrington; Birkan Tunç; Robert T Schultz
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-08

7.  Aging and emotional expressions: is there a positivity bias during dynamic emotion recognition?

Authors:  Alberto Di Domenico; Rocco Palumbo; Nicola Mammarella; Beth Fairfield
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-04

8.  Matching Faces Against the Clock.

Authors:  Markus Bindemann; Matthew Fysh; Katie Cross; Rebecca Watts
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2016-10-03

9.  Photo ID verification remains challenging despite years of practice.

Authors:  Megan H Papesh
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2018-06-27

10.  Profiles on the Orientation Discrimination Processing of Human Faces.

Authors:  Carmen Moret-Tatay; Inmaculada Baixauli-Fortea; M Dolores Grau-Sevilla
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.