Literature DB >> 26489177

A Discrete Choice Experiment to Elicit Patient Willingness to Pay for Attributes of Treatment-Induced Symptom Relief in Comorbid. Insomnia.

Anuja N Roy, S Suresh Madhavan, Andrew Lloyd.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Insomnia is a burdensome, commonly comorbid condition. How patients value various aspects of the safety and efficacy of available drugs has not been studied. The aim of the present study was to quantify patient-rated utility by studying willingness to pay (WTP) for attributes of symptom relief via a discrete choice experiment (DCE).
METHODOLOGY: Adult primary care patients (West Virginia University Hospital) with comorbid insomnia were enrolled. The attributes and levels examined were sleep onset latency (SOL; 10, 20,30 minutes), awakenings (1, 2, 3), wake time after sleep onset (WASO; 15,45, 60 minutes), total sleep time (TST; 6, 7, 8 hours), hangover (none, mild, moderate), FDA-approved duration of use (short term, not restricted to short term, no restrictions), and out-of-pocket cost per month ($20, $35, $50). Willingness to pay (WTP) data were analyzed using a random effects binary logistic regression model.
RESULTS: A total of 82 patients completed the DCE (74 analyzed). SOL, WASO, TST, and cost were all found to predict treatment choice. Higher values of SOL, WASO, and cost resulted in decreased preference for a particular treatment, while higher TST predicted increased preference. Modeling revealed an estimated marginal WTP of $66.69 for an example product that improved SOL by 10 minutes, reduced WASO by 15 minutes, and improved TST by 1 hour.
CONCLUSION: Patient WTP for symptomatic relief in insomnia can help clinicians fine-tune interventions based on patient preferences, provide evidence for drug formulary and reimbursement decisions, and potentially guide the development of novel drugs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26489177      PMCID: PMC4908575     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Manag Care        ISSN: 1062-3388


  17 in total

1.  Validation of the Insomnia Severity Index as an outcome measure for insomnia research.

Authors:  C H. Bastien; A Vallières; C M. Morin
Journal:  Sleep Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.492

2.  Urge incontinence. Quality of life and patients' valuation of symptom reduction.

Authors:  R M O'Conor; M Johannesson; S L Hass; G Kobelt-Nguyen
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Relationship between quality of life instruments, health state utilities, and willingness to pay in patients with asthma.

Authors:  K Blumenschein; M Johannesson
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 6.347

4.  Quality of life, health-state utilities and willingness to pay in patients with psoriasis and atopic eczema.

Authors:  L Lundberg; M Johannesson; M Silverdahl; C Hermansson; M Lindberg
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 9.302

Review 5.  Diagnosis and treatment of chronic insomnia: a review.

Authors:  Ruth M Benca
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 6.  Newer hypnotic drugs for the short-term management of insomnia: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

Authors:  Y Dündar; A Boland; J Strobl; S Dodd; A Haycox; A Bagust; J Bogg; R Dickson; T Walley
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 7.  Economic effects of insomnia.

Authors:  M K Stoller
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.393

Review 8.  Sleep maintenance insomnia: strengths and weaknesses of current pharmacologic therapies.

Authors:  Russell P Rosenberg
Journal:  Ann Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2006 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.567

9.  The direct and indirect costs of untreated insomnia in adults in the United States.

Authors:  Ronald J Ozminkowski; Shaohung Wang; James K Walsh
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.849

Review 10.  Insomnia: epidemiology, characteristics, and consequences.

Authors:  Thomas Roth; Timothy Roehrs
Journal:  Clin Cornerstone       Date:  2003
View more
  4 in total

1.  Conjoint Analysis: A Research Method to Study Patients' Preferences and Personalize Care.

Authors:  Basem Al-Omari; Joviana Farhat; Mai Ershaid
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-02-13

2.  Opportunities and challenges for the inclusion of patient preferences in the medical product life cycle: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rosanne Janssens; Isabelle Huys; Eline van Overbeeke; Chiara Whichello; Sarah Harding; Jürgen Kübler; Juhaeri Juhaeri; Antonio Ciaglia; Steven Simoens; Hilde Stevens; Meredith Smith; Bennett Levitan; Irina Cleemput; Esther de Bekker-Grob; Jorien Veldwijk
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 2.796

3.  Use of Patient Preference Information in Benefit-Risk Assessment, Health Technology Assessment, and Pricing and Reimbursement Decisions: A Systematic Literature Review of Attempts and Initiatives.

Authors:  Lylia Chachoua; Monique Dabbous; Clément François; Claude Dussart; Samuel Aballéa; Mondher Toumi
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-10-26

4.  Therapy satisfaction and willingness-to-pay in Polish patients with restless legs syndrome.

Authors:  Mariusz Sieminski; Marcelina Skrzypek-Czerko; Łukasz Chełminiak
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 2.655

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.