Literature DB >> 26488678

The Ascendancy of Second-Generation Antipsychotics as Frontline Antimanic Agents.

Christopher J Miller1, Mingfei Li, Robert B Penfold, Austin F Lee, Eric G Smith, Samuel S Nordberg, David N Osser, Laura Bajor, Fang Zhang, Mark S Bauer.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Knowledge of the factors affecting the adoption of new medications can enhance mental health care and guide quality improvement and policy development. Food and Drug Administration indications for treating bipolar disorder with several second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) in the 2000s represent an opportunity to identify factors that impact the spread of a then-innovative treatment through a new population.
METHODS: Analysis of Department of Veterans Affairs administrative data identified the population of 170,811 veterans diagnosed with bipolar disorder from 2003 to 2010. We analyzed time trends and predictors of antimanic choice (SGA vs other) among the 40,512 outpatients with bipolar disorder who initiated their first VA outpatient antimanic prescription, using multinomial logistic regression in month-by-month analyses. We conducted classwise analyses and investigated prespecified predictors among specific agents.
RESULTS: In classwise analyses, SGAs supplanted lithium, valproate, and carbamazepine/oxcarbazepine as the most commonly initiated antimanics by 2007. Psychosis, but not other indices of severity, predicted SGA initiation. Demographic analyses did not identify substantial disparities in initiation of SGAs. Drug-specific analyses revealed some consideration of medical comorbidities in choosing among specific antimanic agents, although effect sizes were small. Most patients initiating an antimanic had received an antidepressant in the previous year. DISCUSSION: Second-generation antipsychotics quickly became the frontline antimanic treatment for bipolar disorder, although antidepressants most commonly predated antimanic prescriptions. Second-generation antipsychotics were used for a broad range of patients rather than being restricted to a severely ill subpopulation. The modest association of antimanic choice with relevant medical comorbidities suggests that continued attention to quality prescribing practices is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26488678     DOI: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000000405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 0271-0749            Impact factor:   3.153


  2 in total

1.  Design and conduct of a provider survey to determine a clinically persuasive effect size in planning VA Cooperative Study #590 (Li+).

Authors:  Kelly M Harrington; Matthew H Liang; Keri Hannagan; Soe Soe Thwin; Ryan E Ferguson; Natalie Morgenstern; Erick Flores; Ira R Katz
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2016-08-31

Review 2.  Real-World Patterns of Utilization and Costs Associated with Second-Generation Oral Antipsychotic Medication for the Treatment of Bipolar Disorder: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Michael J Doane; Kristine Ogden; Leona Bessonova; Amy K O'Sullivan; Mauricio Tohen
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 2.570

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.