Literature DB >> 26488628

Retroillumination Photography Analysis Enhances Clinical Definition of Severe Fuchs Corneal Dystrophy.

Allen O Eghrari1, Brian S Garrett, Aisha A Mumtaz, Armand E Edalati, Danielle N Meadows, Elyse J McGlumphy, Benjamin W Iliff, John D Gottsch.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Retroillumination photography analysis (RPA) provides an objective assessment of the number and distribution of guttae in Fuchs corneal dystrophy. Here, we assess its correlation with clinical grading using slit-lamp biomicroscopy across varying levels of severity.
METHODS: Retroillumination photographs were conducted for 95 affected corneas with slit-lamp flash photography after pupillary dilation. Individual guttae were counted manually and the position of individual points recorded. Clinical grading using the Krachmer scale was documented for each eye during examination, and regression analyses were performed to identify the strength of association with number of guttae. We assessed range at each stage of clinical grading and used the Mann-Whitney U test to assess whether clinical grading levels demonstrated successively higher numbers of guttae.
RESULTS: Krachmer score ranged from 1 to 5, with mean of 2.6. Mean numbers of guttae at each level of severity were 289 (1+), 999 (2+), 2669 (3+), 5474 (4+), and 7133 (5+). Each stage demonstrated significantly higher numbers of guttae than its preceding level except from 4+ to 5+ (P = 0.30), consistent with the definition of 4+ as the highest level defined by the presence of guttae. Higher levels of clinical grading were associated with larger ranges of guttae (P < 0.01). A linear regression model resulted in a strong fit between RPA and Krachmer score (r = 0.81).
CONCLUSIONS: In this largest study of RPA data and comparison with subjective clinical grading of Fuchs dystrophy severity, RPA correlates strongly and demonstrates enhanced definition of severity at advanced stages of disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26488628      PMCID: PMC4636944          DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  8 in total

1.  Progression of Fuchs corneal dystrophy in a family linked to the FCD1 locus.

Authors:  Danielle N Meadows; Allen O Eghrari; S Amer Riazuddin; David G Emmert; Nicholas Katsanis; John D Gottsch
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Quantitative regional differences in corneal endothelial abnormalities in the central and peripheral zones in Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy.

Authors:  Hisataka Fujimoto; Naoyuki Maeda; Takeshi Soma; Yoshinori Oie; Shizuka Koh; Motokazu Tsujikawa; Kohji Nishida
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Corneal endothelial dystrophy. A study of 64 families.

Authors:  J H Krachmer; J J Purcell; C W Young; K D Bucher
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1978-11

4.  Age-severity relationships in families linked to FCD2 with retroillumination photography.

Authors:  Elyse J McGlumphy; William S Yeo; S Amer Riazuddin; Amr Al-Saif; Jiangxia Wang; Allen O Eghrari; Danielle N Meadows; David G Emmert; Nicholas Katsanis; John D Gottsch
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Analysis and documentation of progression of Fuchs corneal dystrophy with retroillumination photography.

Authors:  John D Gottsch; Olof H Sundin; Erik V Rencs; David G Emmert; Walter J Stark; Clement J Cheng; Gregory W Schmidt
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.651

6.  Relationship of Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy severity to central corneal thickness.

Authors:  Laura J Kopplin; Katie Przepyszny; Brian Schmotzer; Karen Rudo; Denise C Babineau; Sanjay V Patel; David D Verdier; Ula Jurkunas; Sudha K Iyengar; Jonathan H Lass
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04

7.  Prevalence and severity of fuchs corneal dystrophy in Tangier Island.

Authors:  Allen O Eghrari; Elyse J McGlumphy; Benjamin W Iliff; Jiangxia Wang; David Emmert; S Amer Riazuddin; Nicholas Katsanis; John D Gottsch
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy: subjective grading versus objective grading based on the central-to-peripheral thickness ratio.

Authors:  Daniel J Repp; David O Hodge; Keith H Baratz; Jay W McLaren; Sanjay V Patel
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 12.079

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Automated Retroillumination Photography Analysis for Objective Assessment of Fuchs Corneal Dystrophy.

Authors:  Allen O Eghrari; Aisha A Mumtaz; Brian Garrett; Mahsa Rezaei; Mina S Akhavan; S Amer Riazuddin; John D Gottsch
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.651

2.  Peripheral-to-central ratio of Guttae: validity and reliability of an objective method to characterize severity of Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy.

Authors:  Rohan P Bajaj; Michael J Fliotsos; Tejus Pradeep; Allen O Eghrari
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 3.117

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.