Han Yu Gong1, Yang Li2, Gen Fang2, Dao Heng Hu2, Wen Bin Jin2, Zhao Hai Wang2, Yang Sheng Li2. 1. State Key Laboratory for Hybrid Rice, College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Engineering Research Centre for the Protection and Utilization of Bioresource in Ethnic Area of Southern China, South-Central University for Nationalities, Wuhan, China. 2. State Key Laboratory for Hybrid Rice, College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Abstract
To find a way to promote the rate of carbon flux and further improve the photosynthetic rate in rice, two CO2-transporting and fixing relevant genes, Ictb and FBP/Sbpase, which were derived from cyanobacteria with the 35SCaMV promotor in the respective constructs, were transformed into rice. Three homologous transgenic groups with Ictb, FBP/Sbpase and the two genes combined were constructed in parallel, and the functional effects of these two genes were investigated by physiological, biochemical and leaf anatomy analyses. The results indicated that the mesophyll conductance and net photosynthetic rate were higher at approximately 10.5-36.8% and 13.5-34.6%, respectively, in the three groups but without any changes in leaf anatomy structure compared with wild type. Other physiological and biochemical parameters increased with the same trend in the three groups, which showed that the effect of FBP/SBPase on improving photosynthetic capacity was better than that of ICTB and that there was an additive effect in ICTB+FBP/SBPase. ICTB localized in the cytoplasm, whereas FBP/SBPase was successfully transported to the chloroplast. The two genes might show a synergistic interaction to promote carbon flow and the assimilation rate as a whole. The multigene transformation engineering and its potential utility for improving the photosynthetic capacity and yield in rice were discussed.
To find a way to promote the rate of carbon flux and further improve the photosynthetic rate in rice, two CO2-transporting and fixing relevant genes, Ictb and FBP/Sbpase, which were derived from cyanobacteria with the 35SCaMV promotor in the respective constructs, were transformed into rice. Three homologous transgenic groups with Ictb, FBP/Sbpase and the two genes combined were constructed in parallel, and the functional effects of these two genes were investigated by physiological, biochemical and leaf anatomy analyses. The results indicated that the mesophyll conductance and net photosynthetic rate were higher at approximately 10.5-36.8% and 13.5-34.6%, respectively, in the three groups but without any changes in leaf anatomy structure compared with wild type. Other physiological and biochemical parameters increased with the same trend in the three groups, which showed that the effect of FBP/SBPase on improving photosynthetic capacity was better than that of ICTB and that there was an additive effect in ICTB+FBP/SBPase. ICTB localized in the cytoplasm, whereas FBP/SBPase was successfully transported to the chloroplast. The two genes might show a synergistic interaction to promote carbon flow and the assimilation rate as a whole. The multigene transformation engineering and its potential utility for improving the photosynthetic capacity and yield in rice were discussed.
Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is a staple food for more than half of the
world’s population [1]. The world’s population is projected to grow from the present
seven billion to an estimated ten billion people by 2050, with the growth
concentrated in rice-consuming and rice-producing regions of Asia, Africa and the
Americas [1,2]. Thus, each remaining
hectare will have to feed at least 43 (presently 27) people in Asia due to
population growth and increasing urbanization [3]. Concomitantly, more extreme weather, a scarcity of
water and environmental pollution could also exert adverse effects on rice
production [4,5]. Thus, the rice yield will
have to increase by at least 50% over the next 40 years to prevent the mass
malnutrition of the 700 million Asians that currently rely on rice for more than 60%
of their daily caloric intake [3], and photosynthesis has been a major target for improving plant
productivity via crop biotechnology in recent years [6].Previous studies have shown that more than 90% of the crop biomass is derived from
photosynthetic products, and the enhancement of photosynthesis at the level of per
leaf area increases yields [7-9].
However, conventional breeding practices may be approaching a ceiling effect [10]. Recently, transgenic
technology has been widely used to manipulate photosynthesis by overexpressing
particular exogenous genes or introducing new enzymes or pathways that can
positively influence photosynthesis [11].Cyanobacteria have been regarded as ideal model systems for studying fundamental
biochemical processes such as oxygenic photosynthesis and carbon and nitrogen
assimilation, and it offers a rich source of genes for plant genetic engineering and
the improvement of photosynthetic CO2 fixation [12,13]. The notable advantage of
introducing cyanobacterial genes into plants was illustrated clearly by Zurbriggen
et al. [14]. In addition,
cyanobacteria have been present on earth for 3.5 billion years [15], during which time, they
have endured a changing gaseous environment in which CO2 has declined and
O2 increased. This environmental change has imposed evolutionary
pressure on the cyanobacteria to evolve strategies for effective photosynthetic
CO2-concentrating mechanisms (CCMs) to improve carboxylation via
their relatively inefficient Rubisco enzyme [16,17]. The CCM involves five C
i uptake systems
to effectively pump bicarbonate as the major carbon source and concentrate
CO2 up to 1000-fold around the active site of Rubisco [18], however, the majority of
the higher plants that belong to the C3 group, including most crop
plants, do not possess this ability.In C3 plants, due to the low kinetic affinity for CO2 and high
resistance in the CO2 diffusion pathway (liquid phase in mesophyll
cells), the partial pressure of CO2 at the catalytic site of Rubisco
(C
c, chloroplast CO2 concentration) is
usually not saturated for carboxylation and is the ultimate limiting factor for
photosynthesis [19,20]. Several genes have been
identified in cyanobacteria that could promote the transport of CO2 and
photosynthetic carbon assimilation. One gene is Ictb (inorganic
carbon transporter B), which is involved in HCO3
- accumulation
in Arabidopsis and tobacco. Its expression showed positive effects
on photosynthesis [21-23],
although the detailed mechanisms suggested by Price et al. were unclear [13]. The second gene is
FBP/Sbpase (fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase or
sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphatase), which is a dual functional enzyme in
cyanobacteria that can hydrolyze both FBP (fructose-1,6-bisphosphate) and SBP
(sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphate) with almost equal specific activities in addition
to directly targeting Rubisco [24]. FBP/Sbpase plays an important role in regulating
carbon flow and the regeneration phase of RuBP (ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate) and in
catalyzing the first irreversible reaction in the conversion of triose phosphates to
sucrose [25], as revealed by
an increasing photosynthetic rate in tobacco [26-30].Photosynthesis in plants has been considered for decades to be limited by only two
factors: the velocity of the diffusion of CO2 through stomata, and the
capacity of the photosynthetic machinery to convert light energy to biochemical
energy and fix CO2 into sugars [31]. To improve mesophyll conductance to CO2
(g
m) and further boost photosynthesis and yields,
our basic aim was that rice should be reengineered at the biochemical level in the
Calvin cycle to combine with inorganic carbon transport routes simultaneously and to
achieve the high-efficiency operation of these two major processes in mesophyll
cells. Although transgenic plants with cyanobacterial genes have been generated over
the last two decades [12],
most of them concentrated on single gene that acting on only one site in the
biochemical or substance-transporting route. Based on the original work from the
laboratories of Kaplan (Ictb) and Shigeoka
(FBP/Sbpase) illustrated above, and considering the results of
Feng et al. [32] from our
laboratory, overexpression of the SBPase gene can enhance
photosynthesis and growth under salt stress conditions as well as tolerance to
CO2 assimilation during high temperature stress. Lieman-Hurwitz et
al. [23] illustrated that the
Ictb gene could improve photosynthetic rates compared to wild
type under limiting but not under saturating CO2 concentrations. These
results inferred that only one gene related to the Calvin cycle or carbon diffusion
had not a significant effect on the enhancement of photosynthesis under normal
natural conditions and had a much smaller effect on the yield. To overcome these
shortcomings, we focused our analysis on the complete functions of
Ictb and FBP/Sbpase compared with their
respective functions derived from cyanobacteria following their introduction into
rice. We anticipated that they would act on inorganic carbon transport and
carboxylation in the Calvin cycle, respectively, further increasing the rate of
CO2 transportation and the carboxylation efficiency under natural
field conditions, potentially providing significant information for researching
photosynthesis and rice production.
Materials and Methods
Construct generation
Full-length Ictb (dc14) and the optimised
coding sequence of FBP/Sbpase (D49680) (S1 File)
derived from Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942 were amplified by
PCR using primers Ictb-f (5' cggggtaccatgactgtctggcaaactctgac
3'), Ictb-r (5' gagtctagactacattttttcgtctgaatgct 3') and
FS-f (5' cggggtaccatggctcaatccaccacttccgag 3'),
FS-r (5' gagtctagatcagccaagcaggctgtcgacaaagt 3')
respectively. The products were cloned into vector
pUC18-35S-rbcs-nos skeleton (Wuhan biorun bio-tech. Co.,
Ltd), and the sequences were verified and found to be identical. The amplified
35S-rbcs-Ictb-nos and
35S-rbcs-FBP/Sbpase-nos skeletons were digested with BamHI,
SalI and EcoRI, BamHI respectively, then ligated into pCAMBIA1301 to make
pCAMBIA1301{35S:rbcs:Ictb:nos}
and
pCAMBIA1301{35S:rbcs:FBP/Sbpase:nos}
respectively, and the sequences were verified by sequencing.As for Ictb+FBP/Sbpase construct, the amplified
35S-rbcs-FBP/Sbpase-nos skeletons were cut and ligated into
pCAMBIA1301{35S:rbcs:Ictb:nos}
to produce
pCAMBIA1301{35S:rbcs:FBP/Sbpase:nos}{35S:rbcs:Ictb:nos}.
The amplified 35S-rbcs-nos sequences from
pUC18-35S-rbcs-nos skeleton were digested with EcoRI and
HindIII, and ligated into pCAMBIA1301 to generate the empty construct. All the
sequences were verified by sequencing and found to be identical. The two genes
were under control of the CaMV35S promotor which directs constitutive
high-level transcription of the transgenes, and guided by chloroplastic transit
signal sequence rbcs (ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase small
subunit) and followed by nos termination sequences to provide
single Ictb and FBP/Sbpase and binary
(Ictb-FBP/Sbpase) gene expression
recombinant plasmids.
Generation of transgenic plants
The single (Ictb and FBP/Sbpase, respectively)
and binary (Ictb-FBP/Sbpase) gene expression
recombinant plasmids, and empty construct plasmid were transformed into
Agrobacterium tumefaciens EHA105 (Fig 1A). The Oryza
sativa spp. indica vs. 9311 (wild-type) was
transformed with these resultant plasmids using the standard
Agrobacterium-mediated method as described previously
[22,33]. Shoots were
regenerated on selective medium containing hygromycin (50 mg
L–1), and T1 plants were obtained by
self-pollination of primary transformants (T0). T6 plants
from 2013 were used in photosynthetic, physiological and biochemical analysis
for three experimental replicates in this study.
Fig 1
Production and selection of Ictb and
FBP/Sbpase sense transgenic rice plants.
A. Schematic representation of the T-DNA region of the
pCAMBIA1301 binary vector. LB: left border, RB: right border. The sense
construct contained full-length cyanobacterial Ictb and
FBP/Sbpase cDNA driven by the CaMV 35S promoter,
the nopaline synthase termination sequence and rb:
chloroplastic transit signal sequence rbcs (ribulose
bisphosphate carboxylase small subunit). B. Western blot
analysis of transformants and WT rice. Ten micrograms of leaf protein
samples from the newest fully mature leaves were separated by SDS-PAGE,
and specific polyclonal antibodies were used to detect ICTB and
FBP/SBPase proteins with the correct sizes. HSP (housekeeping protein)
served as an internal control. WT: wild-type, Oryza
sativa spp. indica vs. 9311. Marker:
SM0671. C. Southern blot analysis showing the presence of
the two target genes, Ictb and
FBP/Sbpase, in the genomes of the transgenic lines.
Genomic DNA was digested with BamH1 and hybridized with
[α32P] dCTP-labeled specific probe. M: Marker, 1
Kb ladder. D. RT-PCR analysis of transgenic lines and
wild-type based on the results of the western blot and southern blot
analyses. Each lane represents a sample obtained from one individual
line, and the 400-bp and 350-bp-long Ictb and
FBP/Sbpase cDNA fragments, respectively, were
obtained. Actin served as a loading control. M: Marker
DS2000.
Production and selection of Ictb and
FBP/Sbpase sense transgenic rice plants.
A. Schematic representation of the T-DNA region of the
pCAMBIA1301 binary vector. LB: left border, RB: right border. The sense
construct contained full-length cyanobacterial Ictb and
FBP/Sbpase cDNA driven by the CaMV35S promoter,
the nopaline synthase termination sequence and rb:
chloroplastic transit signal sequence rbcs (ribulose
bisphosphate carboxylase small subunit). B. Western blot
analysis of transformants and WT rice. Ten micrograms of leaf protein
samples from the newest fully mature leaves were separated by SDS-PAGE,
and specific polyclonal antibodies were used to detect ICTB and
FBP/SBPase proteins with the correct sizes. HSP (housekeeping protein)
served as an internal control. WT: wild-type, Oryza
sativa spp. indica vs. 9311. Marker:
SM0671. C. Southern blot analysis showing the presence of
the two target genes, Ictb and
FBP/Sbpase, in the genomes of the transgenic lines.
Genomic DNA was digested with BamH1 and hybridized with
[α32P] dCTP-labeled specific probe. M: Marker, 1
Kb ladder. D. RT-PCR analysis of transgenic lines and
wild-type based on the results of the western blot and southern blot
analyses. Each lane represents a sample obtained from one individual
line, and the 400-bp and 350-bp-long Ictb and
FBP/Sbpase cDNA fragments, respectively, were
obtained. Actin served as a loading control. M: Marker
DS2000.
Plant growth conditions
The seeds of these transgenic plants were allowed to germinate on agar in the
presence of 50 mgL-1 hygromycin, and the seeds of the wild type
plants were allowed to germinate on agar in the absence of hygromycin. After
growth for four weeks, 300 plants of each independent line in every group as an
experimental unit was transferred to the same experimental field paddy and
planted in sets of three. All of the experimental units were distributed
randomly and grown under the same environmental conditions in Huashan country
(exclusive transgenic rice experimental field of Wuhan university, Wuhan city,
E114°31′, N30°32′). All of the measurements of
physiological and biochemical parameters were conducted on flag leaves in the
flowering stage after sowing for 97 days. The samples were selected randomly in
the center of each line to obtain three experimental repeats for every group to
avoid the edge effect of the rice population in the paddy. Data were derived
from three independent replicates of each line in five groups.
Protein Extraction and Western Blot Analysis
Approximately 0.1 g leaf tissue was harvested from the youngest fully expanded
leaves and used for protein estimation and gel blot analysis. Protein estimation
was determined according to the Bradford method using BSA as a standard. Equal
amounts of proteins were separated by 12% SDS-PAGE and electroblotted onto
nitrocellulose membranes and then probed using the specific polyclonal
antibodies Anti-OsICTB and Anti-OsFBP/SBPase in 15 lines. The polyclonal
antibodies were generated by immunizing healthy rabbits using the synthesized
peptides of full-length ICTB (AAB08477) and FBP/SBPase (BAA08536) as antigens.
The protein conjugations, immunizations, and antiserum purifications were
performed by BPI (Beijing Protein Innovation Co., Ltd, Beijing, China), with an
initial purity ≥ 90%. The entire generation process of antibody and the
application of western blot detection using rice tissues were validated by the
BPI company following the instructions of Li et al. [34]. Proteins were detected
using horseradish peroxidase conjugated to the secondary antibody and
Super-ECL® HRP chemiluminescence detection reagent
(SuperSignal® west Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate, Thermo
Scientific, USA).
Southern blot hybridization
Southern blot analysis was performed to verify the integration and copy number of
the two targeted genes. The genomic DNA (30 μg) from WT and 14 transgenic
lines was digested overnight with BamHI, separated in a 1% agarose gel and
blotted onto a nylon transfer membrane (Nytran® SPC, GE
Healthcare, Life Sciences, WhatmanTM, Amersham, UK). Probes with a
size of 400 bp and 350 bp for the Ictb and
FBP/Sbpase genes were prepared from PCR-amplified fragments
using specific primers, respectively, and labeled with [ɑ32P]
dCTP using the Random Primer DNA Labeling Kit Ver.2.0 (TaKaRa Biotechnology Co.,
Ltd, Dalian, China) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The filter
was hybridized to the labeled probe at 65°C overnight, washed with
2×SSC, 0.1% SDS once at room temperature and twice at 65°C for 15
min each and finally washed twice with 0.1×SSC, 0.1% SDS at 65°C
for 15 min each. The membrane was processed for autoradiography. All of the
procedures for the hybridization were performed as described previously [35].
RT-PCR analysis
Total RNA was extracted from fully expanded flag leaves of all of the lines using
TRIzol (Invitrogen) and treated with DNase I following the manufacturer’s
instructions. RT-PCR was performed to amplify the Ictb and
FBP/Sbpase transcripts with specific primers:
Ictb-1: 5′-cggttgccgacttcacctcacgg-3′,
Ictb-2: 5′-ttgctgctgtcttcacgcccca-3′ and
FS-1: 5′-ccgatcggtcgctatacgctgct-3′,
FS-2: 5′-ggcgataccttcgggccactgca-3′
respectively. Actin transcript was also amplified as a control
using the specific primers actin-1:
5′-gccttggcaatccacatc-3′ and actin-2:
5′-agcatgaagatcaaggtggtc-3′. The RT-PCR analysis was repeated
three times in each line with similar results.
Subcellular localization
The subcellular localization of the two genes was investigated by introducing a
binary vector containing CaMV35S:: Ictb-GFP,
CaMV35S:: rbcs-Ictb-GFP and
CaMV35S::
rbcs-FBP/Sbpase-GFP. The
latter two constructs were almost identical to the initial transgenic binary
vector with the only difference being the addition of GFP as an
indicator in the ricemesophyll protoplasts. The protoplasts were prepared from
2-week-old etiolated rice seedlings that were grown hydroponically and used for
transformation by the polyethylene glycol method as described by Cinelli et al.
[36]. The GFP signal
was observed using a FluoView FV1000 Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope
(Olympus).
Gas exchange, fluorescence measurements and the determination of mesophyll
conductance
Leaf gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence were measured simultaneously using
a Li-Cor 6400 portable photosynthesis open system (Li-Cor Inc., Lincoln, NE,
USA). The measurements were performed using expanded flag leaves from 9:00 to
11:00 during the flowering stage under the conditions of a photosynthetic photon
flux density (PPFD) of 1200 μmol m-2s-1 and
C
a-c (ambient CO2 concentration in
the cuvette) of 380 μmol mol-1 in the leaf chamber. The
natural air temperature in the paddy field was 33–35°C, and the
constant relative humidity (RH) was maintained at 80±5%. Photosynthetic
parameters such as gas-exchange measurements, F
s
(steady-state fluorescence), and Fm
′ (maximum
fluorescence) were recorded after the measurement system remained stable. All of
the experimental procedures illustrated above were performed according to Li et
al. [37].Measurements of P
n/C
i
(P
n: net photosynthetic rate;
C
i: intercellular CO2 concentration)
and light response (P
n/PPFD) curves were conducted
on the same leaves under the conditions described above, and the procedure was
conducted according to Li et al. [37]. C
a-c was set as a
series of 0, 50, 100, 200, 400, 600, 800 and 1000 μmol CO2
mol-1, while PPFD was maintained as 1200 μmol
m-2s-1. The initial slope of the
P
n/C
c curves was
calculated as the carboxylation efficiency (CE) when
C
c was <200 μmol CO2
mol-1. Regarding the measurements of the light response curves,
C
a-c was maintained at 380 μmol
mol-1 in the leaf chamber, while PPFD was adjusted following a
series of 0, 50, 100, 200, 400, 600, 800, 1000, 1200, 1400, 1600, 1800 and 2000
μmol photons m-2s-1 based on the methods of Li et
al. [37].The rate of mitochondrial respiration in the light
(R
d) and the CO2 compensation point
related to C
i (Γ*)
were measured according to Li et al. [37]. The intersection point of the
P
n-C
i curves was
assessed at three different light intensities (150, 300 and 600 μmol
m-2s-1), where P
n
represented -R
d, and C
i
indicated Γ*. The measurements were conducted
using the same flag leaves in the flowering stage from 0: 00 h to 4: 00 h in
paddy fields [38-40]. At each PPFD detailed above, C
a-c was
set as the series of 0, 25, 50, 80, and 100 μmol CO2
mol-1. To promote stomatal opening, the leaves were placed in the
cuvette with a PPFD of 600 μmol photons m-2s-1 and
a C
a-c of 100 μmol CO2
mol-1 for thirty minutes. The determination of
Γ* and R
d was
repeated three times and resulted in values that did not differ (P <0.05)
according to Warren [41].
Γ* was corrected for the effects of
temperature based on the temperature response equations reported by Bernacchi et
al. [42].Based on the gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence measurements, estimations
of the total electron transport rate (J
T) were
calculated based on the procedures of Genty et al. [43] and Valentini et al.
[44], and
g
m and C
c were
conducted using the method described by Harley et al. [45], as follows:
where αleaf is the total leaf absorbance and
is assumed to be 0.85 [37,46,47], and β
represents the partitioning of the absorbed quanta between the two photosystems
and is assumed to be 0.5 for C3 plants [37,48,49]. These equations have
been commonly used to calculate the above values by Flexas et al. [19], Hassiotou et al.
[49], and
Vrábl et al. [50],
among others.
Determination of LMAs (leaf dry mass per area) and yield traits
LMA was measured using the same leaves that were used for the photosynthetic
measurements. The leaf area was measured by a digital analysis of the images
using ImageJ software (National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA)
[51]. The dry mass
was determined after the leaves had been oven-dried at 70°C for 48 h to a
constant mass. Finally, the LMA (gm-2) was calculated as the ratio of
leaf dry mass to leaf area, and these measurements were repeated three times for
each line.The main yield traits, including tiller number per plant, filled grains per
panicle, kilo-grain weightiness (g) and plant height (cm) of the 14 transgenic
lines and WT were investigated in the paddy field and laboratory. All of the
calculations described above were performed three times for each line in every
group, and the experimental operations were conducted on T6
generation.
Measurements of WSC levels, Rubisco activity, and chlorophyll content and
calculation of J
cmax
After the gas exchange measurements were performed, the same flag leaves were
used to measure water soluble carbohydrates (WSCs: the sum of the concentrations
of sucrose, glucose and fructose), Rubisco activity and chlorophyll content. The
concentrations of WSCs in the extracts were measured using the modified anthrone
procedure [52,53]. Rubisco activity was
determined using a plant RUBPCase/Rubisco assay kit (GENMED SCIENTIFICS INC.
USA), and the experimental protocol was conducted following the
manufacturer’s instructions. The chlorophyll content of the leaf discs
was determined by adapting the modified procedure described by Porra et al.
[54]. Photographs
were obtained to measure the leaf surface area, and the area values were
calculated using the ImageJ software to convert mg/gFW to g/m2. Next,
samples (0.2 g) of fresh leaf tissue were homogenized in 100% acetone at
4°C away from sunlight, and the fluorescence was measured at 663 nm and
645 nm with a spectrophotometer (TECAN, INFINITE M200 PRO) after centrifugation
of the homogenates. The total chlorophyll content (mg/gFW) of the leaves was
determined according to the modified equation described by Arnon [55]:The light-saturated potential rate of electron transport
(J
max) can be calculated according to the
electron transport rate dependence on the chlorophyll concentration and was
found to be 467 μmol photons (g Chl)-1s-1. The RuBP
regenerative capacity (J
cmax) was determined from
J
max according to the equation of Li et al.
[37] and Farquhar et
al. [56]: where Φ is the ratio of the oxygenation rate
(V
o) to the carboxylation rate
(V
c), which was assumed to have a constant value
of 0.25. All of the experiments and calculations above were performed at least
three times for each line.
Microscopy
The midrib veins were removed from expanded flag leaf blades and cut into
sections of approximately 5×2 mm. The sections were fixed and dehydrated
following the protocol detailed by Scafaro et al. [57]. Transverse sections
(thickness of 7 μm and 80 nm) were cut for light and transmission
electron microscopy, respectively, and measured using ImageJ software.
S
mesindicating the surface area of the
mesophyll cells to the intercellular airspace was calculated as follows:
where F is the curvature correction factor and
is assumed to be 1.55 [57-59]. L
mes is the length of the mesophyll
cells exposed to the intercellular airspace (μm), and W
is the width of the analyzed section (μm). Leaf and mesophyll thickness
were measured at the mid-point between vascular bundles and bulliform cells. All
of the procedures described above were performed according to the methods
reported by Scafaro et al. [57].
Electron microscopy
Leaf samples for transmission electron microscopy were examined using a Tecnai
G2 20 S-TWIN transmission electron microscope (TEM). The
percentage of the cell periphery adjacent to the IAS that was covered by
chloroplasts and stromules
(S
c/S
mes) was
calculated as the length of the cell periphery facing the IAS covered by
chloroplasts (S
c) divided by the total length of the
cell periphery facing the IAS (S
mes).
S
c was the surface area of the chloroplasts
exposed to the intercellular airspace determined as follows: where L
mes
' is the length
of the mesophyll exposed to the intercellular airspace, and
L
c is the length of the chloroplasts exposed to
the intercellular airspace. The mesophyll cell wall thickness was measured and
randomly selected from 6–12 sections per electron micrograph using ImageJ
software, and these experimental manipulations were based on the instructions
illustrated by Scafaro et al. [57].
Measurements of stomatal density, stomatal size and stomatal index
To measure the stomatal density, stomatal index and stomatal size, the abaxial
surface of the flag leaf was sampled separately from the WT and 14 transgenic
lines at the flowering stage. These samples were first washed in sterile water
and then fixed in FAA fixative (10% formaldehyde, 5% glacial acetic acid, 50%
absolute ethanol, 35% sterile water). The samples were then washed serially in
50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 95 and 100% ethanol solutions, and the subsequent protocols
were conducted according to the procedure for improved desiliconization and
scraping described by Chen et al. [60]. All of the samples were viewed using DIC optics
with a Nikon ECLIPSE 80i microscope equipped with a CCD camera, and the stomata
and epidermal cells were counted in five square areas of 0.068 mm2
per leaf. The stomatal index (SI) was calculated using the following equation:
SI = number of stomata / (number of stomatal + number of non-stomatal epidermal
cells) × 100%. Stomatal and epidermal cell counts were determined for
three repeats per plant from three individual plants of each line in every
group.
Statistical analysis
ANOVA (one-way analysis of variance) was applied to assess the differences for
each parameter among transgenic and wild-type groups. Differences among means
were established using Duncan’s test (P < 0.05). The data were
analyzed applying the SPSS 10.0 program for Windows.
Results
Production and selection of rice transformants
The western blot analysis resulted in the identification of the target proteins
ICTB and FBP/SBPase at 51.6 and 37.2 KD, respectively (Fig 1B), which were confirmed
by southern blot analysis and RT-PCR (Fig 1C and 1D), and the constructs had inserted in the
genomes of transgenic lines with only one copy of each gene. The results
indicated that lines 40, 50, 51, 67 and 70 expressed Ictb (ICTB
group), while lines 33, 53 and 80 expressed FBP/Sbpase
(hereafter referred to as FS group), 41, 49 and 69 were Ictb
and FBP/Sbpase expressing lines belonging to ICTB+FS group,
lines 52, 61 and 81 were the empty construct group, and the WT group was 9311.
The analyses of photosynthetic performance, mesophyll conductance to
CO2 and other physiological traits were detected on the lines of
these five groups.
In vivo subcellular localization of ICTB and
FBP/SBPase
Successful transformation and expression of Ictb and
FBP/Sbpase were achieved in rice, but it was unclear
whether the proteins were localized in functional, interacting subcellular
spaces related to CO2 transport and fixation. Consequently, the
in vivo subcellular localization of ICTB and FBP/SBPase
were tested by transiently expressing their fused GFP proteins in living rice
protoplasts (Fig 2). The
results showed that ICTB was present in the cytoplasm with or without RBCS
signal peptide. In the present case, it was possible that our initial procedure
was insufficient to deliver ICTB into chloroplasts and that the final
destination was in the cytoplasm. Because eukaryotic cells are highly
compartmentalized and the subcellular localization of a protein is intrinsic to
its function [61]. The
protein localization findings may support role for ICTB in transcellular carbon
delivery to chloroplasts, as reported for aquaporins [62], which has a positive
role in accelerating carbon diffusion and improving
g
m in the liquid phase (Table 1). FBP/SBPase
localized in the chloroplast and might promote CO2 assimilation in
the transgenic lines based on our results (Table 1). These results meant that they exerted
functions at different sites in the route of CO2 transport and
assimilation respectively, thereby improving the photosynthetic efficiency.
Fig 2
Subcellular localization of ICTB and FBP/SBPase protein.
A, Bright field view of protoplasts. B, GFP
signals from the ICTB-GFP fusion protein. C, Merged images.
D, Red chlorophyll autofluorescence used as a
chloroplast marker. E, GFP signals from the ICTB-RBCS-GFP
fusion protein. F, Merged images. G, Red
chlorophyll autofluorescence. H, GFP signals from the
FBP/SBPase-RBCS-GFP fusion protein. I, Merged images, with
yellow fluorescence in the merged images due to red chloroplast
autofluorescence.
Table 1
Photosynthetic parameters of the transgenic, WT and empty construct
groups.
Empty construct
ICTB
FS
ICTB+FS
WT
gm(mol CO2m-2s-1)
0.18 ± 0.04
0.21 ± 0.04*
0.24 ± 0.05*☆
0.26 ± 0.05*☆
0.19 ± 0.03
Pn(μmol CO2m-2s-1)
13.1 ± 0.1
15.1 ± 0.6*
16.5 ± 0.1*☆
17.9 ± 0.2*☆
13.3 ± 0.1
CE
0.183 ± 0.023
0.177 ± 0.043
0.164 ± 0.011
0.181 ± 0.029
0.191 ± 0.073
gs(mol CO2m-2s-1)
0.16 ± 0.01
0.20 ± 0.01*
0.23 ± 0.01*☆
0.27 ± 0.04*☆
0.15 ± 0.01
Rubisco activity (μmol
CO2min-1)
0.62 ± 0.04
0.74 ± 0.02*
0.81 ± 0.03*☆
0.87 ± 0.03*☆
0.63 ± 0.03
Chlorophyll content
(g/m2)
0.33 ± 0.03
0.36 ± 0.02
0.35 ± 0.02
0.34 ± 0.01
0.32 ± 0.02
Jmax(μmol
photons
m-2s-1)
153.6 ± 14.9
169.2 ± 10.5
165.5 ± 9.6
157.2 ± 4.8
149.4 ± 9.3
Jcmax(μmol
CO2m-2s-1)
30.7 ± 3.0
33.8 ± 2.1
33.1 ± 1.9
31.4 ± 1.0
30.0 ± 1.9
WSC (g/100 g)
2.5 ± 0.1
3.2 ± 0.1*
3.6 ± 0.2*☆
3.8 ± 0.1*☆
2.6 ± 0.3
LMA
(gm-2)
50.1 ± 0.3
52.8 ± 1.4*
56.6 ± 0.4*☆
59.7 ± 0.8*☆
50.3 ± 1.1
*Asterisks indicate a significant difference (P<0.05)
from the wild type and empty construct.
☆Asterisks above ICTB+FS column indicate a significant
difference (P<0.05) from two one-gene transgenic groups
respectively.
☆Asterisks above FS column indicate a significant difference
(P<0.05) from ICTB group.
Values are means ± SD for all lines with three biological
replicates per group.
Subcellular localization of ICTB and FBP/SBPase protein.
A, Bright field view of protoplasts. B, GFP
signals from the ICTB-GFP fusion protein. C, Merged images.
D, Red chlorophyll autofluorescence used as a
chloroplast marker. E, GFP signals from the ICTB-RBCS-GFP
fusion protein. F, Merged images. G, Red
chlorophyll autofluorescence. H, GFP signals from the
FBP/SBPase-RBCS-GFP fusion protein. I, Merged images, with
yellow fluorescence in the merged images due to red chloroplast
autofluorescence.*Asterisks indicate a significant difference (P<0.05)
from the wild type and empty construct.☆Asterisks above ICTB+FS column indicate a significant
difference (P<0.05) from two one-gene transgenic groups
respectively.☆Asterisks above FS column indicate a significant difference
(P<0.05) from ICTB group.Values are means ± SD for all lines with three biological
replicates per group.
Effect of Ictb and FBPase/SBPase on the
variation in leaf anatomical properties
We assessed whether the increased g
m and
P
n in the transgenic groups resulted from the
changes in leaf anatomy properties because leaf anatomy plays a major role in
determining the mesophyll diffusion conductance to CO2 and,
consequently, the variability in photosynthetic capacity among species [63]. Transverse sections of
the leaf lamina examined by light and transmission electron microscopy revealed
no significant leaf anatomical differences between the transgenic groups and WT
(Fig 3, S1 Table).
The five groups displayed similar leaf thicknesses, with numerical values of
89.8±4.9 μm, 90.6±3.5 μm, 91.5±3.6 μm,
91.3±4.2 μm and 90.8±6.1 μm for the empty construct,
ICTB, FS, ICTB+FS and WT, respectively (S1 Table). The same trend was
observed for the mesophyll wall thickness (Fig 3C, 3F, 3I, 3L and 3O, S1 Table).
In rice, most of the cell periphery adjacent to the IAS is covered by
chloroplasts and stromules. Furthermore, chloroplasts encompass almost the
entire periphery of highly lobed cells, with stromules extend along the cell
periphery that is not covered by chloroplasts
(S
c/S
mes≧0.92;
S1
Table). The values obtained for S
mes and
S
c were not significantly different between the
transgenic groups and WT (S1 Table), which is consistent with
a previous report [64].
There were no differences in the number of chloroplasts per mesophyll area and
the sizes of the chloroplasts, which were determining factors for
g
m. Similar results were obtained in the area
occupied by epidermal or bulliform cells. All of the groups had the same amount
of sclerenchymatous and bundle-sheath tissue, which may be an indicator of
similar structural support. The cross-sectional area occupied by the vascular
bundle and intercellular airspace was also similar between the transgenic groups
and WT. Taken together, our results demonstrated that all of the transgenic
groups and WT had a similar leaf anatomical structure (Fig 3), and the introduced
target genes did not change the anatomical properties of the leaves. Moreover,
these results further demonstrated that the transgenic groups and WT had similar
inter-cellular and intracellular spaces and structures for CO2
diffusion and that the increased g
m and
P
n in the transgenic groups was not due to the
properties of the leaf anatomy.
Fig 3
Light and transmission electron micrographs of transverse leaf
sections from empty, transgenic and WT groups.
Empty (A, B, C), ICTB (D, E, F), FS (G, H, I), ICTB+FS (J, K, L) and WT
(M, N, O) lines. BF, bulliform cell; BS, outer bundle-sheath cell; C,
chloroplast; CW, mesophyll cell wall; E, epidermis; IC, intercellular
airspace; M, mesophyll cell; N, nucleus; SC, sclerenchyma strand; ST,
stromule, indicated by white arrows; STC, stomatal cavity; V, vacuole;
VB, vascular bundle.
Light and transmission electron micrographs of transverse leaf
sections from empty, transgenic and WT groups.
Empty (A, B, C), ICTB (D, E, F), FS (G, H, I), ICTB+FS (J, K, L) and WT
(M, N, O) lines. BF, bulliform cell; BS, outer bundle-sheath cell; C,
chloroplast; CW, mesophyll cell wall; E, epidermis; IC, intercellular
airspace; M, mesophyll cell; N, nucleus; SC, sclerenchyma strand; ST,
stromule, indicated by white arrows; STC, stomatal cavity; V, vacuole;
VB, vascular bundle.
Lack of significant phenotypic variations in the stomatal traits of the
transgenic groups compared to WT
The stomatal density and stomatal index of the three transgenic groups and WT at
the flowering stages were shown in S1 Fig. The average stomatal
density (SD) of the transgenic groups ranged from 746 to 756 mm-2 in
comparison to 751 mm-2 for WT at the flowering stage. The average
pavement cell (PC) density of the transgenic groups ranged from 1124 to 1153
mm-2, while the value obtained for WT was 1126 mm-2.
The total cells (TCs) in the transgenic groups ranged from 1871 to 1909
mm-2 compared to 1877 mm-2 in WT (S1A Fig),
and stomatal index (SI) in the three transgenic groups ranged from
0.39–0.40 compared with 0.40 in WT (S1B Fig). The results revealed that
the two target genes did not substantially modify the stomatal distribution,
which is the first component in the CO2 transport path, and these
groups had almost the same stomatal structural properties and density, which
showed that the improved photosynthetic performance was not due to the
structural properties of the stomata.
Impact of Ictb and FBP/Sbpase expression on
photosynthetic performance in the flowering stages
Gas exchange measurements were used to investigate whether the
P
n of three transgenic groups were higher than
that of wild-type under the same light intensity and
C
a in natural paddy fields in which the plants
were grown. The response curve of P
n to varying
C
i was assessed by measuring the CO2
uptake, which indicated that the difference became significant between
transgenic groups and WT as the C
i increased above
200 μmol CO2 mol-1, the values of
P
n tended to stabilize and attain saturation in
all of the groups when the C
i levels exceeded 400
μmol CO2 mol-1 (Fig 4A). The changing range of
P
n in the ICTB, FS, ICTB+FS groups was
31.3–31.9 (mean value 31.6±0.2), 33.4–34.5 (mean value
34.1±0.4) and 35.4–37.3 μmol CO2
m-2s-1 (mean value 36.8±0.6), respectively,
while that of WT and the empty construct was 26.6–26.8 (mean value
26.7±0.1) and 27.3–28.3 (mean value 27.7±0.3) at the
CO2 saturation points, respectively (data not shown). This result
indicated that the P
n of three transgenic groups was
higher than that of WT with values of approximately 18.4%, 27.7% and 37.8%
respectively, and also suggested that the increased ability to perform a maximal
photosynthetic rate in the transgenic groups was due to the functions of these
two genes because the WT and empty construct groups displayed almost the same
performance, and the photosynthetic ability increased in the order of
Ictb, FBP/Sbpase and
Ictb+FBP/Sbpase expression, which showed greater
improvements in the photosynthetic capacity with FBP/Sbpase
than Ictb. An additive effect was observed in the ICTB+FS
groups (Ictb+FBP/Sbpase).
Fig 4
Differences in photosynthetic parameters measured using expanded flag
leaves of rice plants between transgenic, WT and empty construct groups
at the flowering stage.
A, B, C.
P
n responses to
C
i, C
c and
PPFD respectively. Values are means ± SD for all lines with three
biological replicates per group. D. Phenotype of wild-type,
empty construct and three transgenic groups at the maturation stage.
Differences in photosynthetic parameters measured using expanded flag
leaves of rice plants between transgenic, WT and empty construct groups
at the flowering stage.
A, B, C.
P
n responses to
C
i, C
c and
PPFD respectively. Values are means ± SD for all lines with three
biological replicates per group. D. Phenotype of wild-type,
empty construct and three transgenic groups at the maturation stage.Obtaining an estimate of g
m allows the simple
conversion of P
n-C
i
curves into response curves of P
n to
C
c [65]. Using this method, we found that differences in
the curves between the three transgenic groups and WT became significant and
stabilized when C
c was higher than 400 μmol
CO2 mol-1 roughly (Fig 4B), and this trend was identical to that of the
P
n/C
i response
curve. Taken together, these results indicated that the two target genes can
improve the CO2 assimilation capacity of the transgenic groups
compared with WT and empty construct groups based on the same
C
i or C
c.The response of P
n to PPFD was measured (Fig 4C) under the same
atmospheric conditions (C
a = 380 ± 10
μmolmol-1; RH = 80 ± 5%) but with various light
intensities (0–2,000 μmol m-2s-1) at
35°C. At irradiances below 200 μmol m-2s-1,
the three transgenic groups did not display clear difference in photosynthetic
rates with respect to WT. As the light intensity increased, the photosynthetic
rates of the three transgenic groups increased significantly compared to WT when
the light intensity ranged from 500 to 2,000
μmolm-2s-1. Photo-saturation of photosynthesis
was observed when the light intensity exceeded 1,500 μmol
m-2s-1. In comparison to WT, the light saturation
point for the transgenic groups ICTB, FS and ICTB+FS was higher by approximately
17.9%, 25.5% and 37.5%, respectively, and the value obtained for the empty
construct was very similar to that of WT. The results indicated that the light
conversion efficiency increased sequentially in the three transgenic groups and
exhibited an additive effect in the ICTB+FS group. This result could be
explained by the two genes having the ability to promote CO2 flux and
P
n and further increase the demands for light
energy in rice.
The related photosynthetic parameters exhibited a significant increase in
transgenic groups compared to WT
The P
n-PPFD and
P
n-C
i curves in
Fig 4 illustrated
significant differences in P
n at a PPFD of 1200
μmol m-2s-1 and C
a of
380 μmol CO2 mol-1 among the different groups. In
three transgenic groups, ICTB+FS displayed the highest values (17.9 μmol
CO2 m-2s1), ICTB had the lowest values
(15.1), and FS displayed values in the middle (16.5), which were 36.6%, 15.3%
and 26.0% higher than the 13.1 of WT, respectively (Table 1). In addition, the
P
n value for ICTB+FS was higher than that of the
ICTB and FS groups by 18.5 and 8.5%, respectively, and the FS value was
significantly higher than that determined for the ICTB groups by 9.3%. Similar
differences were observed in g
s (stomatal
conductance to CO2) and g
m. Likewise,
clear differences were observed in the total activity of Rubisco, LMA and WSC
(Table 1),
demonstrating the same trend as observed for P
n
illustrated above.C
c is the ultimate limiting factor for
light-saturated photosynthesis after CO2 enters the stomatal pore.
CO2 molecules must pass through other phases to reach the
carboxylation site (C
c), i.e., the cell wall,
plasmalemma, cytosol, chloroplast envelope and stroma. Many recent studies have
demonstrated that P
n depends primarily on the
transportation of CO2 [45]. To estimate g
m and
CE under conditions of PPFD of 1200 μmol m-2s-1,
35°C and C
a = 380 μmol CO2
mol-1, measurements of gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence
were conducted and analyzed concurrently [65,66]. Our results showed that the values for
g
m in the three transgenic groups ICTB, FS and
ICTB+FS, were 10.5%, 26.3% and 36.8% higher than WT, respectively. Nevertheless,
the corresponding values for CE didn’t show significant increment since
there were no differences of P
n values between
groups as C
c was <200 μmol
CO2 mol-1 indicated by the
P
n/C
c curves (Table 1, Fig 4B). These results
demonstrated that the efficiency of CO2 transport from the air to the
carboxylation site had been improved and further increased
P
n based on the growth trend observed for the
ICTB, FS and ICTB+FS groups. The results also indicated that the cyanobacterial
Ictb and FBP/Sbpase genes promoted
CO2 transport capacity and carbon fixation efficiency in
rice.Compared to WT, similar chlorophyll content were observed in the leaves of the
three transgenic groups, resulting in almost the same value for
J
max (Table 1). In our study, 2,000 μmol photons
m-2s-1 was a saturating light intensity due to the
stable value of P
n obtained for these groups at the
atmospheric CO2 concentration, and it could provide sufficient ATP,
NADPH, and RuBP for carboxylation that was significantly less than
J
cmax (Fig 4C; Table 1). These results suggested that the RuBP regeneration rate
was not a limiting factor for the light-saturated photosynthetic rate. With the
increase in C
c, P
n
increased to approach the value of J
cmax, and
C
c was >600 μmol CO2
mol-1 in all of the groups when P
n
attained the maximal value (Fig
4B). All of the above findings indicated that
C
c was the ultimate limiting factor for
photosynthesis when C
c was not saturated [37].
Yield traits and plant height were partly improved by Ictb
and FBP/Sbpase
The rice grain yield is mainly determined by three components, including the
tiller number per plant, filled grain number per panicle, and the grain weight
[67]. In the present
study, only the tiller number per plant in the ICTB+FS group displayed a
significant increment compared with FS, ICTB and WT group respectively, while
the other two components did not show an increase (S2A–S2C Fig). In FS group,
kilo-grain weightiness decreased significantly compared to WT and ICTB group
respectively although tiller number and filled grains per panicle were slightly
higher than that of WT. As for ICTB group, the three components did not exhibit
any increase in contrast with WT, and it seemed the main yield traits in the
one-gene transgenic groups had not been improved. In addition, the plant height
in three transgenic groups were clearly increased compared with the WT plants,
and ICTB group showed significant while ICTB+FS and FS group showed great
significant increment (Fig
4D; S2D Fig). The results indicated that the tillering capacity in
ICTB+FS and the biomass above ground of three transgenic groups were
significantly higher than those of WT.
Discussion
Leaf anatomy and mesophyll conductance to CO2
The photosynthetic rate in plants is determined by the velocity of the diffusion
of CO2 through stomata and the capacity to fix CO2 into
sugar. The stomatal pore and the path through the mesophyll from the cell wall
to Rubisco are two primary resistance to CO2 diffusion. The mesophyll
pathway comprises a series of physical barriers to CO2 diffusion,
including cell walls, lipid membranes, liquid cytoplasm and stroma [63,68]. Our basic goal was to
reduce the resistance in the mesophyll pathway by introducing the cyanobacterial
Ictb gene to boost mesophyll conductance, which is also
influenced by the structure of the leaf [49,57,63,69-71]. The ultimate goal was
to increase the CO2 carboxylation efficiency by introducing another
cyanobacterial FBP/Sbpase gene in rice. However, our results
showed that the leaf anatomy was similar in almost all respects between the
three transgenic groups, WT and the empty construct, and there were no
differences in the stomatal density,
S
c/S
mes, thickness
of the mesophyll cell wall or chloroplast size, which are critical structural
components of a leaf that affect g
m [37,63,68]. This finding indicated
that the increased g
m and
P
n in the transgenic groups was not due to the
effect of the leaf anatomy properties and mesophyll cell structure but to the
biochemical functions of ICTB and FBP/SBPase. In addition, the expression of
Ictb and FBP/Sbpase, whether alone or
together, would modify the diffusion limitations along the biochemical path of
CO2 transport rather than the physical diffusion conductance
inside the leaves.Many previous analyses have demonstrated that g
m and
P
n change to permit adaptation to the
environmental conditions in which the species evolves, such as light, nutrients,
water and temperature [37,72-76]. In our study, the transgenic groups and WT were planted in the same
paddy field with the same ecological niche, and thus, different effects of
environmental factors on leaf and mesophyll cell structure and properties
between transgenic groups and WT were precluded. The present results indicated
that the two target genes were not sufficient to modify the leaf anatomy
structure, such as the arrangement of mesophyll cells in the CO2
diffusion path and the surrounding chloroplasts directly abutting the mesophyll
cells. The results also suggested that the increased
P
n and g
m were not
related to the leaf anatomy structure but were due to the biochemical functions
of the two target genes. In addition, the results indirectly proved that the
leaf anatomy structure was determined mainly by the environmental conditions, as
suggested by previous studies such as Assuero et al. [77] and Gomez-Del-Campo et
al. [78].Flexas et al. [31]
demonstrated the occurrence of an evolutionary trend towards a higher
g
m, and the photosynthetic capacity of
angiosperms was greatly increased following the cretaceous period in association
with the changes in leaf morphology. Evolutionary pressure resulted in the
evolution of strategies to efficiently acquire inorganic carbon for
photosynthesis [79]. In
addition, cultivated rice has been domesticated and selected for approximately
8000–10,000 years [80], and it shows extensive stromule formation that allows
S
c/S
m to approach
1.0, which is consistent with our findings and higher than the values observed
for species without stromules in which
S
c/S
m never exceeds
0.8 [81]. These
observations support the hypothesis that stromules in photosynthetic cells
function to seal breaches between adjacent chloroplasts, thus improving the
trapping mechanism of photorespired and respired CO2 [59,81]. However, the
adjustment in mesophyll cell thickness, geometry and packing according to
ambient light conditions may function to control the distribution of internal
light and maximize light absorption and carbon fixation within the leaf [82]. Considered together
with our results, these observations demonstrated that rice had evolved a
sophisticated leaf anatomy structure and cellular ultrastructure for trapping
CO2 from the intercellular airspace and created optimal
conditions for improving the photosynthetic rate. In the present study, the two
target genes were related to CO2 transport and fixation but not to
the cell structure, and it seems plausible that it was very difficult to change
the mesophyll structure under natural environmental conditions.
The effect of Ictb and FBP/Sbpase on
biochemical functions, physiological and yield traits
In our results, Rubisco activity of transgenic groups increased significantly
compared with WT and the empty construct. The values for CE showed no
differences as C
c was <200 μmol
CO2 mol-1, and P
n
exhibited marked difference along with the increasing of
C
c when C
c was
>200 μmol CO2 mol-1. These results supported
the previous conclusions that the carboxylation capacity and activity of Rubisco
are regulated by the chloroplastic CO2 concentration and which is
also generally considered to be an ultimate limiting factor for CO2
fixation [37]. Thus, ICTB
and FBP/SBPase could promote carbon diffusion and stimulated the activity and
carboxylation capacity of Rubisco alone or together and then achieved higher
P
n at CO2 saturation point. The other
photosynthetic parameters determined for the empty construct group were very
similar to those of WT, which indicated that the expression construct alone
without target genes could not change the photosynthetic capacity and that the
increased parameters in the transgenic groups was not a consequence of the
construct sequence or a mutation in the host genome due to an insertion. Thus,
in the ICTB+FS group, the functional additive effect could be explained by the
ability of ICTB to boost the carbon flux and drive more CO2 into the
chloroplast. Then, the Calvin cycle is accelerated by
FBP/Sbpase to consume and convert carbon to avoid carbon
redundancy. Carbon transport and carboxylation reactions were linked together by
these two genes and improved simultaneously, and they were usually associated
with the photosynthetic capacity.The expression of Ictb and FBP/Sbpase also
exerted positive effects on LMA and WSC compared with WT, but no differences
were observed between them in terms of the anatomical structure of the leaf. A
tentative conclusion might be drawn from these results as follows, the increased
LMA primarily resulted from the increased WSC, and the increased WSC produced by
the improved photosynthesis was not used to build the structural components such
as support tissues and cell wall, which involve stronger CO2
diffusion limitations for photosynthesis and likely only accumulated chemical
substances in mesophyll cells. In the three transgenic groups, ICTB+FS exhibited
the highest value for LMA and WSC (Table 1) and showed higher tiller number (S2A Fig).
These results indicated that the capacity to preserve and transport WSC to
grains increased only under the addition effect of ICTB and FS, although the
photosynthetic parameters in FS and ICTB groups showed significant increment
compared to that of WT. These results inferred that photosynthetic capacity was
not always related to the yield traits positively, and the potential underlying
mechanisms require further analysis because rice yield is considered to be a
quantitative trait that is controlled by multiple genes [83]. These findings also
demonstrated that neither expression of both nor one of the target genes was
sufficient to improve all of the yield traits, and potential problems associated
with improving the rice yield in the transgenic groups might remain unresolved
due to the limitations of our techniques. The most probable explanation was that
the carbohydrate export pathway from source to sink should be facilitated to
avoid carbohydrate redundancy in mesophyll cells.
The relationships of Ictb, FBP/Sbpase and
light energy conversion capacity
In addition to the velocity of CO2 diffusion through stomata and the
capacity to fix CO2 into sugar, photosynthesis in plants has also
been considered for decades to be limited by the capacity of the photosynthetic
machinery to convert light energy into biochemical energy. Our results revealed
no differences in chlorophyll content among the three transgenic groups compared
with WT and the empty construct group, which had similar values for
J
max and J
cmax.
Although the Ictb and FBP/Sbpase genes were
not directly related to light absorbance and conversion, they promoted
g
m and the light-saturated photosynthetic rate
compared with WT. Considering that J
max is maximal
light-driven electron flux and can be used to estimate the potential
photosynthetic capacity derived from light and the capacity for RuBP
regeneration, these results indicated that the capacity of the photosynthetic
machinery to convert light into biochemical energy and the RuBP regenerative
capacity were similar and sufficient to increase P
n
and g
m. A possible explanation was that these two
increased photosynthetic parameters was not related to the capacity to convert
light energy but mainly to the biochemical function of these two proteins alone
or combined.
The functional synergistic effect of Ictb and
FBP/Sbpase
Subcellular localization studies suggested that FBP/SBPase was present in
chloroplasts and ICTB was in the cytoplasm with or without RBCS signal peptide.
These studies indicated that our initial transgenic procedures could not deliver
ICTB into chloroplasts, and the potential observed mechanisms were likely a
result of an eclipsed distribution [61,84]. These findings could be ascribed to its intrinsic function as a
membrane protein and a natural address in the cytoplasm, coinciding with the
assertion that ICTB is related to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and can cause
an accumulation of unfolded membrane proteins in the ER to produce a classic ER
shock response, as proposed by Agarwal et al. [85], Urade [86] and Price et al. [13]. Nevertheless, the ICTB protein alone had a
positive effect on photosynthetic parameters such as
g
m and P
n despite
its location outside the chloroplast, in accordance with our initial purpose,
because it could deliver CO2 more effectively through the
cytomembrane and liquid phase cytoplasm, which are considered important
obstacles to carbon flux. These findings and the results of Simkin et al. [87] provided partial
answers to the question proposed by Price et al. [13] and clues for further
studies of the function of Ictb.Based on the assertions illustrated above, a positive effect in two one-gene
groups and an additional effect in the ICTB+FS group, the two target proteins
likely have a synergistic interaction which was also confirmed in tobacco by
Simkin et al. [87], and
this interaction without a physical binding could be interpreted as a functional
interaction according to Bassel et al. [88]. Thus, ICTB potentially decreased the
CO2 transfer resistance in mesophyll cells, and FBP/SBPase
promoted carbon assimilation in chloroplasts and improved the overall
photosynthetic capacity in the transgenic groups.
Conclusions and Expectations
The g
m is an important limiting factor in
photosynthesis, comprising ~20 to ~50% of the photosynthetic limitations [89], and
C
s/C
a = 0.60 to 0.85
(C
s, CO2 concentration in the
sub-stomatal cavity). However, the amount of CO2 drawn from the
sub-stomatal cavity to the bulk intercellular spaces is small, and the ratio is
as follows: C
i/C
s = 0.90
to 0.99 [68]. The two
values can be converted to
C
i/C
a = 0.7, which
is remarkably constant across C3 species [90]. Techniques to improve
the velocity of CO2 absorbance from intercellular space into
mesophyll cells (that is, how to utilize CO2 in the intercellular
space sufficiently to increase g
m) is an important
research topic. Because it is impractical to change the structure of the
stomatal cavity due to its bi-functionality and regulation of water vapor
diffusion [91], an
effective method is to improve the permeability of the cell wall and chloroplast
envelope to CO2 transport because they have been identified as major
limiting components to CO2 transport [68].ICTB was located in the cytoplasm and contributed to improvements in
g
m and P
n, while
FBP/SBPase was located in chloroplasts and demonstrated improved functionality
compared with ICTB. These results inferred the function of the genes operating
in the Calvin cycle (located in chloroplasts) were more important than those
only acting on the carbon diffusion (located in cytoplasm) for the promotion of
photosynthesis. This results explained the acceleration of the Calvin cycle to
more efficiently consume and convert carbon, and both an intense requirement for
CO2 and the promotion of g
m and
P
n were observed. These effects were more
pronounced than those in ICTB group, although ICTB alone could also promote
g
m and P
n.Based on the better performance of the yield traits in the ICTB+FS group and the
ideal tactics illustrated above, we think that the most effective method is the
transformation of a key gene in the Calvin cycle and other genes that function
at different sites in the carbon flux pathway to form a
“bead-like” pattern and improve the entire efficiency of
CO2 transport and fixation. We are attempting to assemble a
CO2 transport and assimilation (Calvin cycle) chain to improve
the photosynthetic rate and yield traits via multigene transfer (MGT), and we
anticipate that this issue will become a high priority in future studies.
Phenotypic distributions of the stomatal density at the flowering stage
of the three transgenic, WT and empty construct groups grown in the same
paddy field.
(TIF)Click here for additional data file.
Agronomic traits of the transgenic rice groups, WT and empty construct
groups.
(TIF)Click here for additional data file.
The full length of Ictb and FBP/Sbpase
CDS sequence.
(DOC)Click here for additional data file.
Leaf anatomical properties of three transgenic, WT and empty construct
groups.
Authors: Gang-Ping Xue; C Lynne McIntyre; Colin L D Jenkins; Donna Glassop; Anthony F van Herwaarden; Ray Shorter Journal: Plant Physiol Date: 2007-12-14 Impact factor: 8.340
Authors: Sajad Hussain; Zaid Ulhassan; Marian Brestic; Marek Zivcak; Suleyman I Allakhverdiev; Xinghong Yang; Muhammad Ehsan Safdar; Wenyu Yang; Weiguo Liu Journal: Photosynth Res Date: 2021-07-07 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Douglas J Orr; Auderlan M Pereira; Paula da Fonseca Pereira; Ítalo A Pereira-Lima; Agustin Zsögön; Wagner L Araújo Journal: F1000Res Date: 2017-10-26
Authors: Robert P Koester; Charles P Pignon; Dylan C Kesler; Rebecca S Willison; Miyoung Kang; Yu Shen; Henry D Priest; Matthew B Begemann; Kevin A Cook; Gary A Bannon; Mohammed Oufattole Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-02-04 Impact factor: 3.240