Literature DB >> 2648781

New insights and new approaches for the treatment of essential hypertension: selection of therapy based on coronary heart disease risk factor analysis, hemodynamic profiles, quality of life, and subsets of hypertension.

M C Houston1.   

Abstract

The pharmacologic therapy of mild primary hypertension (diastolic blood pressure less than 105 mm Hg) has effectively reduced hypertensive arteriolar end organ disease such as cerebrovascular accidents, congestive heart failure, and nephropathy, but there has been no convincing evidence that coronary heart disease (CHD) or its complications, acute myocardial infarction or angina, have been reduced. The risks of therapy with certain antihypertensive drugs may outweigh their treatment benefits as it relates to CHD. The optimal treatment strategy should be to reduce all CHD risk factors, reverse the hemodynamic abnormalities present by lowering the systemic vascular resistance (SVR), preserving cardiac output (CO) and perfusion, and to select the best antihypertensive drug for concomitant medical diseases or problems while maintaining a good quality of life. Antihypertensive drugs that have favorable or neutral effects on CHD risk factors include alpha blockers, calcium channel blockers, central alpha agonists, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. On the other hand, diuretics and beta blockers without intrinsic sympathomimetic activity have unfavorable effects on many CHD risk factors. Baseline and serial evaluation of the effects of these drugs on serum lipids, lipid subfractions, glucose, uric acid, electrolytes, exercise tolerance, left ventricular hypertrophy, blood pressure, SVR, CO, perfusion, concomitant diseases, and side effects is necessary to evaluate overall cardiovascular risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2648781     DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(89)90631-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  21 in total

Review 1.  Progress in the 1980s and new directions in the 1990s with hypertension management. From the stepped-care approach to the individualised programme in hypertension treatment and control.

Authors:  H Pardell; P Armario; R Hernández
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Metabolic effects of carteolol and dilevalol in essential hypertension.

Authors:  T Baba; K Takebe; T Tomiyama
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Topical timolol and serum lipoproteins.

Authors:  J West; S Longstaff
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Nonpharmacologic management of hypertension.

Authors:  S Brunton
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1991-03

Review 5.  The applied pharmacology of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists (beta blockers) in relation to clinical outcomes.

Authors:  J D Fitzgerald
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.727

6.  Costs of antihypertensive therapy.

Authors:  A L Hume
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  A case of hypertension.

Authors:  P D Gerber
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Transcriptional activation of low density lipoprotein receptor gene by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and Ca(2+)-channel blockers involves protein kinase C isoforms.

Authors:  L H Block; R Keul; M Crabos; R Ziesche; M Roth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Hypertension and coronary heart disease risk factor management.

Authors:  M C Houston
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.435

Review 10.  Clinical practice guidelines for treatment of diabetes mellitus. Expert Committee of the Canadian Diabetes Advisory Board.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-09-01       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.