Literature DB >> 26487206

Discordant findings between preoperative endoscopy and postoperative pathology as an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer patients.

Ju-Hee Lee1, Kang Nyeong Lee2, Hyun-Il Kim3, Min Gyu Kim3,4, Tae Kyung Ha1,4, Sung Joon Kwon5,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopically diagnosed early gastric cancers (EGCs) are sometimes revealed to be advanced gastric cancers (AGCs) on pathologic examination of the resected specimen, and also endoscopically diagnosed AGCs are often determined to be EGCs. This study was designed to determine the impact on prognosis of the discordant finding between preoperative endoscopy and postoperative pathology in gastric cancer patients.
METHODS: Patients with gastric cancer stages pT1a-T4a who underwent curative gastrectomy between 2004 and 2010 were included in the study. The preoperative endoscopic findings and clinicopathologic features were analyzed. The prognostic impact on recurrence-free survival of discordance between endoscopic and pathologic examinations was analyzed using multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: Among 367 patients diagnosed with EGC on preoperative endoscopy, 40 (11 %) had AGC on final pathologic examination; this was more common in female patients, upper one-third location of the cancer, poorly differentiated tumor, combined gross type (elevated and depressed), lymphovascular invasion and lymph node metastasis. Among 350 patients diagnosed with AGC on preoperative endoscopy, 66 (19 %) had EGC pathologically; this was more frequent in patients with tumor in the lower and/or middle third of the stomach, differentiated tumor, Borrmann type 1 and absence of lymph node metastasis. The endoscopic appearance of AGC was identified as a poor prognostic factor related to recurrence-free survival in patients with EGC, whereas discordance did not influence recurrence-free survival in patients with AGC.
CONCLUSIONS: Discordant preoperative endoscopic appearance may be an indicator of biologic aggressiveness and a reliable prognostic factor in EGC, but not in AGC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endoscopic appearance; Gastric cancer; Prognosis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26487206     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4541-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  10 in total

Review 1.  Imaging in local staging of gastric cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Robert Michael Kwee; Thomas Christian Kwee
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-05-20       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  The accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography in differentiating mucosal from deeper gastric cancer.

Authors:  Robert M Kwee; Thomas C Kwee
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3).

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 7.370

4.  Early gastric cancer. Endoscopic diagnosis of depth of invasion.

Authors:  T Sano; Y Okuyama; O Kobori; T Shimizu; Y Morioka
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Clinical correlation of endoscopic ultrasonography with pathologic stage and outcome in patients undergoing curative resection for gastric cancer.

Authors:  David Bentrem; Hans Gerdes; Laura Tang; Murray Brennan; Daniel Coit
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Endoscopic prediction of tumor depth of gastric carcinoma for assessing the indication of its limited resection.

Authors:  T Namieno; K Koito; T Hiigashi; M Takahashi; T Shimamura; K Yamashita; Y Kondo
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.906

7.  Advanced gastric cancer with early cancer macroscopic appearance: is it worthy of D2 lymphadenectomy?

Authors:  Zhe Sun; Zhen-ning Wang; Guo-lian Zhu; Bao-jun Huang; Kai Li; Yan Xu; De-ming Li; Hui-mian Xu
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Endoscopic and histological criteria for preoperative evaluation of the depth of infiltration of gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  E G Cristallini; C Paganelli; S Ascani; G B Bolis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Early gastric cancer mimicking advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  K Kitamura; T Yamaguchi; S Nishida; K Yamamoto; K Okamoto; H Taniguchi; A Hagiwara; K Sawai; T Takahashi
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Early Gastric Cancer-Like Advanced Gastric Cancer versus Advanced Gastric Cancer-Like Early Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Hyun Sik Park; Sun-Young Lee; Sung Noh Hong; Jeong Hwan Kim; In-Kyung Sung; Hyung Seok Park; Chan Sup Shim; Choon Jo Jin
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2013-03-31
  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Diagnostic accuracy of the gastric cancer T-category with respect to tumor localization.

Authors:  Kenji Nanishi; Katsutoshi Shoda; Takeshi Kubota; Toshiyuki Kosuga; Hirotaka Konishi; Atsushi Shiozaki; Hitoshi Fujiwara; Kazuma Okamoto; Eigo Otsuji
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 3.445

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.