BACKGROUND: A robotic approach to general surgery procedures may provide improved postoperative outcomes compared to either open or laparoscopic approaches. The role of robotics for gastroesophageal surgery, however, is still being evaluated. STUDY DESIGN: A review of the prospective database for robotic surgery at Valley Hospital between January 2002 and March 2014 identified 105 patients who underwent robotic gastric and esophageal resection. Patient demographics and perioperative factors were studied. RESULTS: Over a 12 years period, 105 patients underwent robotic gastroesophageal resection. The median operative time for distal gastrectomy (230 min [112-327]) was significantly less compared to either total gastrectomy (302 min [214-364]) or esophagogastrectomy (309 min [190-682]). The length of stay for patients undergoing distal gastrectomy (6 days [4-32]) was also significantly less than patients undergoing total gastrectomy (11 days [7-43]), as well as esophagogastrectomy (9 days [5-64]). In regard to the learning curve to perform robotic gastroesophageal surgery, there was a significant correlation between operative time and overall experience. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that robotic gastroesophageal surgery is feasible and can be safely performed. Assuming familiarity with the open procedures and acquisition of basic robotic skills, the learning curve for robotic gastroesophageal surgery requires approximately 20 cases.
BACKGROUND: A robotic approach to general surgery procedures may provide improved postoperative outcomes compared to either open or laparoscopic approaches. The role of robotics for gastroesophageal surgery, however, is still being evaluated. STUDY DESIGN: A review of the prospective database for robotic surgery at Valley Hospital between January 2002 and March 2014 identified 105 patients who underwent robotic gastric and esophageal resection. Patient demographics and perioperative factors were studied. RESULTS: Over a 12 years period, 105 patients underwent robotic gastroesophageal resection. The median operative time for distal gastrectomy (230 min [112-327]) was significantly less compared to either total gastrectomy (302 min [214-364]) or esophagogastrectomy (309 min [190-682]). The length of stay for patients undergoing distal gastrectomy (6 days [4-32]) was also significantly less than patients undergoing total gastrectomy (11 days [7-43]), as well as esophagogastrectomy (9 days [5-64]). In regard to the learning curve to perform robotic gastroesophageal surgery, there was a significant correlation between operative time and overall experience. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that robotic gastroesophageal surgery is feasible and can be safely performed. Assuming familiarity with the open procedures and acquisition of basic robotic skills, the learning curve for robotic gastroesophageal surgery requires approximately 20 cases.