Literature DB >> 26486349

Stimulation of Bone Repair with Ultrasound.

Frédéric Padilla1, Regina Puts2, Laurence Vico3, Alain Guignandon3, Kay Raum2.   

Abstract

This chapter reviews the different options available for the use of ultrasound in the enhancement of fracture healing or in the reactivation of a failed healing process: LIPUS, shock waves and ultrasound-mediated delivery of bioactive molecules, such as growth factors or plasmids. The main emphasis is on LIPUS, or Low Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound, the most widespread and studied technique. LIPUS has pronounced bioeffects on tissue regeneration, while employing intensities within a diagnostic range. The biological response to LIPUS is complex as the response of numerous cell types to this stimulus involves several pathways. Known to-date mechanotransduction pathways involved in cell responses include MAPK and other kinases signaling pathways, gap-junctional intercellular communication, up-regulation and clustering of integrins, involvement of the COX-2/PGE2 and iNOS/NO pathways, and activation of the ATI mechanoreceptor. Mechanisms at the origin of LIPUS biological effects remain intriguing, and analysis is hampered by the diversity of experimental systems used in-vitro. Data point to clear evidence that bioeffects can be modulated by direct and indirect mechanical effects, like acoustic radiation force, acoustic streaming, propagation of surface waves, heat, fluid-flow induced circulation and redistribution of nutrients, oxygen and signaling molecules. One of the future engineering challenge is therefore the design of dedicated experimental set-ups allowing control of these different mechanical phenomena, and to relate them to biological responses. Then, the derivation of an 'acoustic dose' and the cross-calibration of the different experimental systems will be possible. Despite this imperfect knowledge of LIPUS biophysics, the clinical evidence, although most often of low quality, speaks in favor of the clinical use of LIPUS, when the economics of nonunion and the absence of toxicity of this ultrasound technology are taken into account.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone repair; Low intensity pulsed ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26486349     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-22536-4_21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol        ISSN: 0065-2598            Impact factor:   2.622


  10 in total

1.  [Effectiveness of pulsed ultrasound on bone fracture healing speed-up].

Authors:  Dirk Stengel; Eckehard Froese; Wolf Mutschler; Julia Seifert
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  A Combinational Therapy of Articular Cartilage Defects: Rapid and Effective Regeneration by Using Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound After Adipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cell Transplantation.

Authors:  Byeong-Wook Song; Jun-Hee Park; Bomi Kim; Seahyoung Lee; Soyeon Lim; Sang Woo Kim; Jung-Won Choi; Jiyun Lee; Misun Kang; Ki-Chul Hwang; Dong-Sik Chae; Il-Kwon Kim
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 4.169

3.  Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells stimulated with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound: Better choice of transplantation treatment for spinal cord injury: Treatment for SCI by LIPUS-BMSCs transplantation.

Authors:  Guang-Zhi Ning; Wen-Ye Song; Hong Xu; Ru-Sen Zhu; Qiu-Li Wu; Yu Wu; Shi-Bo Zhu; Ji-Qing Li; Man Wang; Zhi-Gang Qu; Shi-Qing Feng
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 5.243

4.  Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound in combination with SonoVue induces cytotoxicity of human renal glomerular endothelial cells via repression of the ERK1/2 signaling pathway.

Authors:  Xiu Liu; Bei Wang; Hongyu Ding; Hao Shi; Ju Liu; Hongjun Sun
Journal:  Ren Fail       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.606

Review 5.  The crosstalk between sonodynamic therapy and autophagy in cancer.

Authors:  Yujie Zhang; Yuanru Zhao; Yuanyuan Zhang; Qingguang Liu; Mingzhen Zhang; Kangsheng Tu
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 5.988

6.  A Tissue Engineering Acoustophoretic (TEA) Set-up for the Enhanced Osteogenic Differentiation of Murine Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (mMSCs).

Authors:  Hui Zhang; Nirina Beilfuss; Urszula Zabarylo; Kay Raum; Regina Puts
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 6.208

7.  Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Regulates MicroRNA 21 Expression to Activate TGF-β Signaling in Human Bone Marrow Stromal Cells to Enhance Osteoblast Differentiation.

Authors:  Nagarajan Selvamurugan; Zhiming He; Daniel Rifkin; Branka Dabovic; Nicola C Partridge
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2017-04-23       Impact factor: 5.443

Review 8.  Direct Control of Stem Cell Behavior Using Biomaterials and Genetic Factors.

Authors:  Jeong-Kee Yoon; Mi-Lan Kang; Joo Hyun Park; Kyoung-Mi Lee; Young Min Shin; Jin Woo Lee; Hyun Ok Kim; Hak-Joon Sung
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 5.443

9.  Transcriptome sequencing analysis reveals the effect of combinative treatment with low‑intensity pulsed ultrasound and magnesium ions on hFOB1.19 human osteoblast cells.

Authors:  Haiyue Zu; Xueting Yi; Dewei Zhao
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 2.952

10.  Functional regulation of YAP mechanosensitive transcriptional coactivator by Focused Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound (FLIPUS) enhances proliferation of murine mesenchymal precursors.

Authors:  Regina Puts; Paul Rikeit; Karen Ruschke; Petra Knaus; Sophie Schreivogel; Kay Raum
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.