| Literature DB >> 26486182 |
Siba P Midya1,2, Manoj K Sahoo1,2, Vinod G Landge1,2, P R Rajamohanan3, Ekambaram Balaraman1,2.
Abstract
Development of multicatalytic approach consisting of two or more mechanistically distinct catalytic steps using a single-site catalyst for rapid and straightforward access of structurallyEntities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26486182 PMCID: PMC4639815 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms9591
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Figure 1Reactivity of unprotected anilines with alkynes.
(a) Transition-metal-catalysed hydroamination of alkynes (a formal addition of a N–H bond across a carbon–carbon multiple bond). (b) Previous work involving transition-metal (TM)-catalysed oxidative C–H bond activation/annulation of anilines with alkynes to indole derivatives (DG, directing group; E, electron-withdrawing group). (c) In this report, reversed reactivity of anilines with alkynes in the rhodium-catalysed C–H activation/carbonylation tandem to quinoline derivatives.
Figure 2Rhodium-catalysed C–H bond activation of unprotected anilines.
(a) Rhodium-catalysed C–H bond activation of anilines with alkynes leading to the formation of carbon–carbon bonded product. (b) Effect of various substituents in the non-directed C–H bond activation of anilines. (c) Rhodium-catalysed regioselective ortho-deuteration of anilines.
Optimization of rhodium-catalysed C–H bond activation of anilines with alkynes and CO (surrogates).
| 1 | CO | THF | 49 (42) |
| 2 | CO | H2O | 46 (39) |
| 3 | aq. HCHO | — | 52 (40) |
| 4 | (HCHO) | THF | 62 (33) |
| 5 | (HCHO) | DMF | 74 (19) |
| 6 | (HCHO) | CH3CN | 87 (7) |
| 7 | (HCHO) | H2O | 93 |
| 8 | (HCHO) | H2O | 95 |
| 9 | CO | H2O | 61 (32) |
THF, tetrahydrofuran
Reaction conditions: 3,4-(methylenedioxy)aniline 1a (0.1 mmol), methyl propiolate 2a (0.11 mmol), [Rh(cod)Cl]2 (1 mol%), dppm (10 mol%), CO source (0.25 mmol in case of CO surrogates and/or 3 atm of CO) and 50 μl of solvent were heated at 100 °C in a closed viol for 12 h.
*Isolated yields and yields in parenthesis represent recovery of 1a.
†A measure of 50 μl of solvent (10:1 mixture of solvent and water) and 8 h.
‡2.5 mol% of [Rh(cod)Cl]2 was used.
Figure 3Scope of anilines.
Reaction conditions: anilines 1a–j (0.25 mmol), methyl propiolate 2a (0.275 mmol), [Rh(cod)Cl]2 (2.5 mol%), dppm (10 mol%), (HCHO) (2.5 equiv.) and 250 μl of H2O were heated at 100 °C under closed viol for specified time and depicted yields are isolated yields (yields in parentheses are recovery of the starting material). *Yield based on 1H NMR of crude reaction mixture using toluene as an internal standard (using 1 mol% of the rhodium catalyst).
Figure 4Scope of alkynes.
Reaction conditions: 0.25 mmol of 3,4-(methylenedioxy)aniline (1a) or 3,4-domethoxyaniline (1m), alkynes (0.275 mmol), [Rh(cod)Cl]2 (2.5 mol%), dppm (10 mol%), (HCHO) (2.5 equiv.) and 250 μl of H2O were heated at 100 °C under closed viol for specified time and depicted yields are isolated yields (yields in parentheses are recovery of the starting material).
Figure 5Evidence for the formation of C–C bonded intermediate.
Reaction of 1a with DMAD (dimethyl acetylenedicarboxylate) 2c.
Figure 6Synthesis of 8, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor.
Reaction conditions: 0.25 mmol of 4m (synthesized by our auto-tandem strategy) and 4 ml of aq. NH3 were heated at 80 °C under closed viol for 72 h.
Figure 7Rhodium-catalysed carbonannulation of ortho-vinylanilines using CO (surrogate) in water.
Reaction conditions: ortho-vinylanilines 5a–g (0.25 mmol), [Rh(cod)Cl]2 (2.5 mol%), dppm. (10 mol%), (HCHO) (3 equiv.) and 250 μl of H2O were heated at 100 °C under closed viol for specified time and the yields in parenthesis are recovery of unreacted starting material. *Yields based on 1H NMR of the reaction mixture (using 1 mol% of the rhodium catalyst).
Figure 8Mechanistic investigation.
(a) Irreversibility of regioselective C–H bond activation of 1a. (b) Isolation of intermediates (C–C cross-coupled product) followed by carbonylation reaction. (c) Reaction of 1c with methyl propiolate (2a) in the absence of CO source. (d) Rhodium-catalysed auto-tandem reaction with labelled compounds. (e) Rhodium-catalysed CO formation from paraformaldehyde. (f) Kinetic isotopic experiments. (Yields in parentheses are isolated yields).
Figure 9Mechanistic rationale for the rhodium-catalysed auto-tandem construction of quinoline.
Proposed catalytic cycles.