Literature DB >> 26485675

Probability of detection of DNA deposited by habitual wearer and/or the second individual who touched the garment.

Michelle Breathnach1, Linda Williams2, Louise McKenna2, Elizabeth Moore3.   

Abstract

Available literature on the detection of transferred DNA does not address the interpretation issues in relation to who wore rather than touched the garment. To acquire a greater knowledge of the rate of detectable wearer, toucher and background DNA, 63 males wore their own underpants for 12h. The inside-waistband was handled by one of 11 female volunteers for 15s. The waist-band was mini-taped and subjected to DNA profiling with the AMPFℓSTR(®) NGM SElect™ kit. The findings show that on worn garments the probability of observing reportable DNA profiles is 61.9%. The wearer was detected as a single profile or part of a mixed profile in 50.8% of samples. When the wearer was present in a mixture, he was always observed as the major contributor. The toucher was detected on 11.1% of underpants. Reportable background DNA (non-wearer and non-toucher) occurs in 14.3% of samples and may affect the assessment of who wore the garment. Greater knowledge of the frequency of detection of reportable wearer DNA and/or toucher allows scientists to evaluate the likelihood of observing a matching profile if an individual wore a garment rather than touched it in disputed case scenarios.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Background DNA; DNA; Indirect transfer; Likelihood ratio; Touch DNA; Wearer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26485675     DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet        ISSN: 1872-4973            Impact factor:   4.882


  5 in total

1.  Persistence of touch DNA on burglary-related tools.

Authors:  Céline M Pfeifer; Peter Wiegand
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Cognitive-psychology expertise and the calculation of the probability of a wrongful conviction.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Rouder; John T Wixted; Nicholas J S Christenfeld
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12

3.  Touch DNA: impact of handling time on touch deposit and evaluation of different recovery techniques: An experimental study.

Authors:  Francesco Sessa; Monica Salerno; Giuseppe Bertozzi; Giovanni Messina; Pietrantonio Ricci; Caterina Ledda; Venerando Rapisarda; Santina Cantatore; Emanuela Turillazzi; Cristoforo Pomara
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Interpol review of forensic biology and forensic DNA typing 2016-2019.

Authors:  John M Butler; Sheila Willis
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 5.  DNA Transfer in Forensic Science: Recent Progress towards Meeting Challenges.

Authors:  Roland A H van Oorschot; Georgina E Meakin; Bas Kokshoorn; Mariya Goray; Bianca Szkuta
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-07       Impact factor: 4.096

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.