Literature DB >> 26485590

Health Utility Improves After Surgery for Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome.

Aaron K Remenschneider1, Maryanna Owoc, Elliott D Kozin, Michael J McKenna, Daniel J Lee, David H Jung.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Health utility value (HUV) is an outcome measure used to calculate quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and to determine cost-effectiveness of medical treatments. Herein, we measure HUV in patients with superior canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS) before and after surgical repair. Health utility values of patients with SCDS are compared to normative data of the general United States population. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. PATIENTS: Adult patients with SCDS.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center.
INTERVENTIONS: SCD repair via middle fossa craniotomy or transmastoid approaches. PRIMARY OUTCOME: change in HUV, as measured by the Short-Form 6-Dimension questionnaire. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: autophony index (AI), dizziness handicap inventory (DHI), and hearing handicap inventory (HHI).
RESULTS: Fifty-one patients with SCDS were enrolled, 23 underwent surgical repair. Mean HUV in patients with SCDS is significantly lower than the general U.S. POPULATION: 0.68 (SD = 0.13) versus 0.80 (0.29), p < 0.01, respectively. Patients electing to undergo surgical repair had similar values relative to nonoperated patients: 0.65 (0.13) versus 0.71 (0.14), p = 0.20, respectively. At mean follow-up of 12 months (range 3-39), postoperative HUV improved to 0.79 (0.12), p < 0.01. AI decreased (improved) after repair: 32.7 (28.0) to 4.8 (8.3), p < 0.001. DHI and HHI did not change significantly after surgery, p > 0.14. Nonoperated patients had no significant change in HUV during a mean follow-up period of 21 months (range 9-39), p = 0.33.
CONCLUSIONS: SCDS patients have significantly lower HUV compared with the general U.S. POPULATION: HUV demonstrated improvement after surgery. Nonoperated patients have ongoing impaired quality of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26485590     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000886

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  5 in total

Review 1.  Recent surgical options for vestibular vertigo.

Authors:  Stefan Volkenstein; Stefan Dazert
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-12-18

Review 2.  Heterogeneity in Reported Outcome Measures after Surgery in Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome-A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Mira E Ossen; Robert Stokroos; Herman Kingma; Joost van Tongeren; Vincent Van Rompaey; Yasin Temel; Raymond van de Berg
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 3.  Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome: Lessons from the First 20 Years.

Authors:  Bryan K Ward; John P Carey; Lloyd B Minor
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 4.003

4.  Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Syndrome - Diagnosis and Surgical Management.

Authors:  Marite Palma Diaz; Juan Carlos Cisneros Lesser; Alfredo Vega Alarcón
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-04

5.  Superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome: Diagnostic criteria consensus document of the committee for the classification of vestibular disorders of the Bárány Society.

Authors:  Bryan K Ward; Raymond van de Berg; Vincent van Rompaey; Alexandre Bisdorff; Timothy E Hullar; Miriam S Welgampola; John P Carey
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.354

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.