Alan K Fotoohi1, Hazhar Karim, Pierre Lafolie, Anton Pohanka, Jennie Östervall, Thomas Hatschek, Sigurd Vitols. 1. *Department of Medicine, Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden;†Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of Sulaimani, Kurdistan, Iraq;‡Department of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Karolinska Institutet;§Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Karolinska Univeristy Hospital; and¶Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Tamoxifen is still an important antihormonal treatment option for patients with breast cancer and estrogen receptor-positive tumors. More than 20% of patients relapse despite treatment. The drug is usually dosed 20 mg/d irrespective of interindividual variation in drug clearance. To study interindividual and intraindividual variation in plasma levels we measured tamoxifen and metabolite levels in plasma on 2 occasions, with at least 4 weeks in between, of 39 women (19 premenopausal and 20 postmenopausal women) on adjuvant treatment (20 mg/d) of early breast cancer. METHODS: We used an ultra-performance liquid chromatography with a mass spectrometry detection method for identification and quantification of tamoxifen, N-desmethyltamoxifen, 4-OH-tamoxifen, and endoxifen. Follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, and estradiol levels were also measured. RESULTS: The plasma concentrations of tamoxifen and its metabolites showed a pronounced interindividual variation, whereas intraindividual concentrations were rather stable. Despite the same dosage, interindividual tamoxifen concentrations varied from 51 to 307 ng/mL (124 ± 57, mean ± SD) and endoxifen values showed a range from 3.2 to 19 ng/mL (10.4 ± 5.2, mean ± SD), that is, 6-fold variation for both. CONCLUSIONS: Large interindividual variation of tamoxifen and endoxifen with stable intraindividual levels, and too low levels of endoxifen in a considerable proportion of patients strongly support that therapeutic drug monitoring and individualized dosing could lead to optimal exposure and hopefully better outcome. A randomized outcome study between conventional dosing and therapeutic drug monitoring-guided dosing is needed to show whether this approach works.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Tamoxifen is still an important antihormonal treatment option for patients with breast cancer and estrogen receptor-positive tumors. More than 20% of patients relapse despite treatment. The drug is usually dosed 20 mg/d irrespective of interindividual variation in drug clearance. To study interindividual and intraindividual variation in plasma levels we measured tamoxifen and metabolite levels in plasma on 2 occasions, with at least 4 weeks in between, of 39 women (19 premenopausal and 20 postmenopausal women) on adjuvant treatment (20 mg/d) of early breast cancer. METHODS: We used an ultra-performance liquid chromatography with a mass spectrometry detection method for identification and quantification of tamoxifen, N-desmethyltamoxifen, 4-OH-tamoxifen, and endoxifen. Follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, and estradiol levels were also measured. RESULTS: The plasma concentrations of tamoxifen and its metabolites showed a pronounced interindividual variation, whereas intraindividual concentrations were rather stable. Despite the same dosage, interindividual tamoxifen concentrations varied from 51 to 307 ng/mL (124 ± 57, mean ± SD) and endoxifen values showed a range from 3.2 to 19 ng/mL (10.4 ± 5.2, mean ± SD), that is, 6-fold variation for both. CONCLUSIONS: Large interindividual variation of tamoxifen and endoxifen with stable intraindividual levels, and too low levels of endoxifen in a considerable proportion of patients strongly support that therapeutic drug monitoring and individualized dosing could lead to optimal exposure and hopefully better outcome. A randomized outcome study between conventional dosing and therapeutic drug monitoring-guided dosing is needed to show whether this approach works.
Authors: Hye In Woo; Se Kyung Lee; Jiyoung Kim; Seok Won Kim; Jonghan Yu; Soo Youn Bae; Jeong Eon Lee; Seok Jin Nam; Soo-Youn Lee Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2017-11-01
Authors: Anabel Beatriz Sanchez-Spitman; Dirk-Jan A R Moes; Jesse J Swen; Vincent O Dezentjé; Diether Lambrechts; Patrick Neven; Hans Gelderblom; Henk-Jan Guchelaar Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2020-05-29 Impact factor: 3.333