| Literature DB >> 26484590 |
Christopher K Uejio, Sunny Mak, Arie Manangan, George Luber, Karen H Bartlett.
Abstract
Vancouver Island, Canada, reports the world's highest incidence of Cryptococcus gattii infection among humans and animals. To identify key biophysical factors modulating environmental concentrations, we evaluated monthly concentrations of C. gatti in air, soil, and trees over a 3-year period. The 2 study datasets were repeatedly measured plots and newly sampled plots. We used hierarchical generalized linear and mixed effect models to determine associations. Climate systematically influenced C. gattii concentrations in all environmental media tested; in soil and on trees, concentrations decreased when temperatures were warmer. Wind may be a key process that transferred C. gattii from soil into air and onto trees. C. gattii results for tree and air samples were more likely to be positive during periods of higher solar radiation. These results improve the understanding of the places and periods with the greatest C. gattii colonization. Refined risk projections may help susceptible persons avoid activities that disturb the topsoil during relatively cool summer days.Entities:
Keywords: Basidiomycota; Canada; Cryptococcus gattii; Vancouver Island; climate; cryptococcosis; fungi; longitudinal studies; temperature
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26484590 PMCID: PMC4622228 DOI: 10.3201/eid2111.141161
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Emerg Infect Dis ISSN: 1080-6040 Impact factor: 6.883
Summary of findings from longitudinal Cryptococcus gattii studies*
| Location (reference) | Genotype, serotype | Medium | Highest isolation frequency | Lowest isolation frequency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| British Columbia, Canada ( | VGIIa (AFLP6A, serotype B), VG IIb (AFLP6B, serotype B) | Air | Summer: PPT 31 mm/mo, T 11°C–24°C | Winter: PPT 166 mm/mo, T−1°C to 6°C |
| Bogotá, Colombia ( | B | Tree | Rainy season: RH ≈85%, PPT 120 mm/mo, T 14.4°C–14.8°C | Dry season: Low RH ≈67%, PPT <5 mm, T 14.0°C |
| Bogotá, Cúcuta,
Medellín, Cali,
Colombia ( | B | Tree | High RH, low T, low EVAP | Low RH, high T, high EVAP |
| C | Tree | Low RH, high T, high EVAP | High RH, low T, low EVAP | |
| Punjab, Haryana,
Delhi, Chandigarh,
India ( | VGIb (AFLP4) | Tree | Autumn: RH ≈54%, PPT 60 mm/mo, T 25°C; summer: RH ≈30%, PPT 20 mm/mo, T 32°C; rainy: RH ≈60%, PPT 150 mm/mo, T 31°C | Winter: RH ≈55%, PPT 10 mm/mo, T ≈17°C; Spring: RH ≈39%, PPT 11 mm/mo, T 23°C |
| Jabalpur, India ( | B | Tree | Summer: T 32°C, PPT 0.9–141 mm/mo | Rainy: T 6.6°C–30.6°C, PPT 141–589 mm/mo |
| S | B | Tree | November: PPT 244 mm/mo, T 22°C | Other months: PPT 10– 400 mm/mo, T 18°C–26.5°C |
| Barroso Valley, Australia ( | B | Air | Eucalyptus flowering (Dec–Feb): PPT 0–4.32 mm/mo, T 20.4°C–21.5°C | Other months: PPT 5.08–164 mm/mo, T 8°C–20°C |
*Most studies identified the seasons with the greatest or lowest C. gattii isolation frequency. Studies commonly examined relative humidity (RH), temperature (T), precipitation (PPT), or evaporation (EVAP).
FigureAreas on Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada, in which environmental samples were collected to determine Cryptococcus gattii concentrations during 2002–2004. Environment Canada provided weather information from 15 stations across the island.
Mean Cryptococcus gattii concentrations for soil and air samples or proportion of positive tree swab samples, Vancouver Island, British Columbia Canada, 2002–2004*
| Medium | Level | Mean | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parksville | Duncan | Courtenay | Errington | LQFP | Nanaimo | Victoria | Other | ||
| Soil, CFU (no. samples) | Plot | 2,006 (49) | 80,139 (18) | – | – | – | 1,635 (28) | ||
| Soil, CFU (no. samples) | Area | 572 (12) | 56 (43) | 556 (17) | 4 (14) | 0 (7) | 0 (6) | 0 (18) | – |
| Air, CFU (no. samples) | Plot | 100 (113) | 202 (38) | 2 (34) | |||||
| Tree, % (no. samples) | Plot | 26 (57) | 95 (21) | – | – | 60 (15) | 50 (22) | ||
| Tree, %, (no. samples) | Area | 55 (55) | 10 (42) | 15 (34) | 13 (9) | 0 (4) | 5 (110) | ||
*LQFP, Little Qualicum Falls Park. †Blank cells indicate areas not included in the analysis. Dashes (–) indicate study areas with a small sample size that were lumped into the column entitled “other.” This information is reported for the plot and area analysis levels.
Generalized linear and mixed effect model result of the association between weather and Cryptococcus gattii in resampled plots in Vancouver Island, British Columbia Canada, 2002–2004
| Medium and independent variable | Estimate | SE | 95% CI | p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soil, CFU* | ||||
| Intercept | 567.16 | 167.21 | 232.7 to 901.5 | 0.001 |
| Mar−May vs. Nov−Feb | 1.06 | 0.78 | −0.50 to 2.626 | 0.174 |
| Jun–Jul vs. Nov–Feb | 15.75 | 2.38 | 10.98 to 20.50 | <0.001 |
| Aug–Oct vs. Nov−Feb | 12.12 | 1.83 | 8.45 to 15.78 | <0.001 |
| Longitude (°W) | 4.47 | 1.34 | 1.79 to 7.15 | <0.001 |
| Average daily temperature, °C | −1.25 | 0.19 | −1.63 to −0.87 | <0.001 |
| Average daily wind speed 1.5−3 m/s | −3.45 | 0.81 | −5.06 to −1.83 | <0.001 |
| Average daily wind speed >3 m/s | −5.68 | 0.99 | −7.66 to −3.69 | <0.001 |
| Previous month's natural logarithm ( | 0.51 | 0.11 | 0.30 to 0.73 | <0.001 |
| Garry oak vs. fir/cedar | 1.19 | 1.82 | −2.45 to 4.84 | 0.514 |
| Maple vs. fir/cedar | 1.61 | 1.43 | −1.25 to 4.47 | 0.262 |
*95 samples, 45 plots, 3 study areas,,Akaike Information Criterion = 648.4. †175 samples, 24 plots, 3 study areas, Akaike Information Criterion = 615.4. ‡115 samples, 44 plots, 4 study areas, Akaike Information Criterion = 117.9.
Association between weather and the first Cryptococcus gattii sample in study areas, Vancouver Island, British Columbia Canada, 2002–2004*
| Medium and independent variable | Estimate | SE | 95% CI | p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soil† | ||||
| Intercept | 25.08 | 15.57 | −6.05 to 56.21 | 0.107 |
| Jun–Juy vs. Mar–May | 60.47 | 25.04 | 10.39 to 110.50 | 0.016 |
| Aug–Oct vs. Mar–May | 20.24 | 12.13 | −4.02 to 44.49 | 0.095 |
| Average daily temperature, °C | −4.66 | 2.15 | −8.96 to −0.36 | 0.030 |
| Cedar vs. alder | 1.24 | 6.56 | −11.88 to 14.35 | 0.850 |
| Fir vs. alder | −2.34 | 7.44 | −17.22 to 12.52 | 0.753 |
| Oak vs. alder | −1.28 | 9.49 | −20.27 to 17.70 | 0.893 |
| Maple vs. alder | −0.63 | 7.07 | −14.78 to 13.51 | 0.929 |
| Other vs. alder | −0.95 | 7.33 | −15.60 to 13.70 | 0.897 |
| Previous month's natural logarithm( | 0.65 | 1.52 | −2.38 to 3.69 | 0.666 |
*Determined by generalized linear and mixed effect model. †116 samples, 7 study areas, Akaike Information Criterion = 194.7. ‡254 samples, 6 study areas, Akaike Information Criterion = 180.7.