| Literature DB >> 26484339 |
Diego F Cuadros1, Adam J Branscum2, F DeWolfe Miller3, Susanne F Awad4, Laith J Abu-Raddad5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Growing evidence suggests significant geographic clustering of male circumcision (MC) in Tanzania. The impact of spatial heterogeneity of MC prevalence on HIV transmission dynamics in this country is not well documented. The aim of this study was to assess the spatial association between MC and HIV infection in Tanzania.Entities:
Keywords: HIV; Tanzania; male circumcision; medical geography; spatial analysis
Year: 2015 PMID: 26484339 PMCID: PMC4586325 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2015.00218
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Figure 1Tanzania districts (A), and sample locations for the TDHS 2011–12 (B).
Figure 2Continuous surface maps of male circumcision (MC) prevalence (A) and HIV prevalence (B) in Tanzania estimated in the year 2012. Black circles in (A) indicate the location of the MC cold spots identified by spatial scan statistics. Areas with significant association between MC and HIV prevalence are shown in (C), and the type of the association is identified in (D).
Epidemiological characteristics outside of male circumcision cold spots and within male circumcision cold spots.
| 2003–04 | 2007–08 | 2011–12 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outside MC cold spots (%) | Within MC cold spots (%) | Outside MC cold spots (%) | Within MC cold spots (%) | Outside MC cold spots (%) | Within MC cold spots (%) | |
| 95% CI | 95% CI | 95% CI | 95% CI | 95% CI | 95% CI | |
| Total fraction of the population | 58.71 (57.58–59.84) | 41.29 (40.16–42.41) | 56.63 (55.51–57.75) | 43.37 (42.24–44.48) | 60.71 (59.79–61.60) | 39.29 (38.40–40.20) |
| Fraction of the male population | 57.72 (55.99–59.45) | 42.28 (40.56–44.01) | 55.66 (53.92–57.40) | 44.34 (42.59–46.08) | 60.23 (58.84–61.60) | 39.77 (38.39–41.16) |
| Fraction of the female population | 59.46 (57.97–60.95) | 40.54 (39.05–42.03) | 57.30 (55.83–58.74) | 42.70 (41.25–44.16) | 61.04 (59.86–62.23) | 38.96 (37.77–40.14) |
| Total HIV prevalence | 6.88 (6.15–7.60) | 9.02 (7.92–10.11) | 5.32 (4.67–5.96) | 8.45 (7.43–9.47) | 4.36 (3.83–4.90) | 6.41 (5.72–7.11) |
| HIV prevalence in the male population | 5.70 (4.68–6.71) | 8.44 (6.87–10.02) | 3.88 (2.99–4.78) | 7.35 (5.88–8.82) | 2.77 (2.10–3.47) | 5.48 (4.49–6.47) |
| HIV prevalence in the female population | 7.74 (6.74–8.74) | 9.46 (7.95–10.97) | 6.24 (5.36–7.13) | 9.22 (7.83–10.61) | 5.49 (4.72–6.27) | 7.12 (6.14–8.10) |
| Male circumcision prevalence | 91.66 (90.51–92.83) | 41.83 (39.04–44.63) | 91.47 (90.27–92.67) | 36.14 (33.46–38.81) | 91.67 (90.69–92.65) | 40.93 (38.81–43.04) |
| RR of HIV infection in females compared to males | 1.25 (1.01–1.53) | 1.17 (0.93–1.46) | 1.53 (1.19–1.96) | 1.12 (0.88–1.43) | 1.78 (1.42–2.24) | 1.03 (0.85–1.26) |
| RR of HIV infection in the male population | Ref | 1.73 (1.36–2.20) | Ref | 2.65 (1.99–3.5) | Ref | 2.73 (2.12–3.53) |
| RR of infection in the female population | Ref | 1.39 (1.16–1.67) | Ref | 1.98 (1.63–2.40) | Ref | 1.83 (1.54–2.16) |
MC, male circumcision; CI, confidence interval; RR, relative risk.
Figure 3HIV prevalence for males (blue bars) and females (red bars) outside and within the male circumcision cold spots. Continuous lines (purple and gray) illustrate the relative risk of HIV infection in females compared to males.
Figure 4HIV incidence rate for males and females outside and within the male circumcision cold spots during 2004–2008 (red bars) and 2008–2012 (blue bars).