Literature DB >> 26484195

Using shRNA experiments to validate gene regulatory networks.

Catharina Olsen1, Kathleen Fleming2, Niall Prendergast2, Renee Rubio2, Frank Emmert-Streib3, Gianluca Bontempi1, John Quackenbush2, Benjamin Haibe-Kains4.   

Abstract

Quantitative validation of gene regulatory networks (GRNs) inferred from observational expression data is a difficult task usually involving time intensive and costly laboratory experiments. We were able to show that gene knock-down experiments can be used to quantitatively assess the quality of large-scale GRNs via a purely data-driven approach (Olsen et al. 2014). Our new validation framework also enables the statistical comparison of multiple network inference techniques, which was a long-standing challenge in the field. In this Data in Brief we detail the contents and quality controls for the gene expression data (available from NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus repository with accession number GSE53091) associated with our study published in Genomics (Olsen et al. 2014). We also provide R code to access the data and reproduce the analysis presented in this article.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colon cancer; Gene expression; Knock-down; Microarray; shRNA

Year:  2015        PMID: 26484195      PMCID: PMC4535466          DOI: 10.1016/j.gdata.2015.03.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genom Data        ISSN: 2213-5960


Direct link to deposited data

Deposited data can be found here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE53091

Experimental design, materials and methods

Short hairpin RNA experiments

We selected eight genes known to be involved in the RAS pathway, namely CDK5, HRAS, MAPK1, MAPK3, MAP2K1, MAP2K2, NGFR and RAF1. They are hereafter referred to as ‘core genes’ due to their relevance in the RAS pathway [2] and their consequential importance in colorectal cancer [8]. The knock-down experiments were performed on the eight core genes using short hairpin RNA (shRNA) in two colorectal cancer cell lines SW480 and SW620 [4]. For each knock-down there are six replicates (except CDK5 in SW620 with five replicates) with three different types of controls (empty vector, nontarget and non transduced), totaling 125 samples. We used the Affymetrix GeneChip HG-U133PLUS2 platform to profile the gene expression of each sample.

Quality control

We used the simpleaffy Bioconductor package [7] to check the quality of each individual CEL file. Fig. 1 shows that a majority of files contains a sufficiently large percentage of present calls (> 40%, except for biological replicates one and two and HRAS biological replicate three with 39.58%) and all scale factors lie within a 3-fold range which complies with the good quality guidelines from Affymetrix [1]. In more detail, we can observe that those CEL files that were generated in the early stages of the data generation are of lower quality than the rest of the files, namely the biological replicates one and two (Fig. 2 and Table 1).
Fig. 1

Quality controls for the Affymetrix Raw data generated in [5]. CEL file names for each experiment is provided on the left side, followed by the percentage of present and absent calls (in red) following the Affymetrix guidelines. The blue region in the middle of the plot represents the 3-fold region for scale factor as this region is considered as acceptable according to Affymetrix guidelines; any scale factor outside this region is drawn in red as it is considered an indicator of poor quality. Beta-actin and GAPDH 3′–5′ ratios are also represented on the right side by triangles and circles, respectively; ratio higher than 1.25 are drawn in red as they are considered indicators of poor quality.

Fig. 2

Call percentage for each CEL file. The colors correspond to the biological replicate number. The quality of the first two replicates is lower than for the remaining five replicates.

Table 1

For each biological replicate, the time of data generation is specified. There are three main batches: 2008 (biological replicates 1), 2009 (biological replicates 2) and 2011 (biological replicates 3–7).

Date
2008-12-162008-12-172009-07-152011-07-192011-07-20
Biological replicate11110000
2002200
3000155
4000191
5000173
6000182
700020

Normalization

The raw and normalized data are available from NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus repository [3] with accession number GSE53091.

Basic analysis

A successful knock-down experiment should result in significantly lower expression compared to the unperturbed samples. Here, we assess the quality of a knock-down experiments by testing the difference between matched knock-down samples versus nontarget control samples using a Wilcoxon signed rank test [6]. In Fig. 3, we show the difference between knock-down and control sample expression for each of the eight knock-downs for both cell-lines together. In each plot, the knocked-down gene is highlighted in blue and the obtained p-values are represented by symbols in the bottom of each plot. The significance levels are represented as follows: ‘***’ for p < 0.001, ‘**’ for p < 0.01, ‘*’ for p < 0.05 and ‘-’ for p < 0.1.
Fig. 3

Each plot shows the difference of expression for the eight core genes. The knocked down gene highlighted in light blue. The significance level is indicated by ‘-’ for p < 0.1, ‘*’ for p < 0.05, ‘**’ for p < 0.01 and ‘***’ for p < 0.001 using a Wilcoxon signed rank test.

From the eight plots in Fig. 3, we can observe that the difference in expression between knock-down and control samples is significant for all of the eight knock-downs (the differential expression of the blue boxes is significantly lower than zero). In our study [5], we determined the set of significantly affected genes for each of the eight knock-downs. For example, the knock-down of RAF1 significantly changes the expression of MAP2K2 and NGFR with p-values < 0.001 (only considering the eight core genes). We then used the set of significantly affected genes to quantitatively validate inferred gene regulatory interactions.

Discussion

In this article we described a unique data set containing RAS pathway-related gene knock-down experiments in two different colon cancer cell-lines. It contains the expression values from the knock-down of eight genes as well as three different controls in six biological replicates. The genome-wide gene expression was measured using the Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array. This data was recently used in a published study on the validation of regulatory gene networks [5].
Specifications
Organism/cell line/tissueHuman/SW480, SW620/colorectal tumor tissue
SexMale
Sequencer or array typeGPL570 [HG-U133_Plus_2] Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array
Data formatRaw and fRMA normalized
Experimental factorsshRNA
Experimental featuresRNAi-mediated gene knock-down experiments in two colorectal cell lines, targeting eight key genes in the RAS pathway. The experiments were done in six biological replicates of each knockdown and controls in both cell lines. From each sample, we profiled gene expression using the Affymetrix GeneChip HGU133PLUS2 platform.
ConsentNone necessary, data are publicly available.
Sample source locationATCC
  5 in total

1.  Simpleaffy: a BioConductor package for Affymetrix Quality Control and data analysis.

Authors:  Claire L Wilson; Crispin J Miller
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-08-02       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  RAS signaling pathways, mutations and their role in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kypros Zenonos; Katy Kyprianou
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2013-05-15

3.  Classification of human colorectal adenocarcinoma cell lines.

Authors:  A Leibovitz; J C Stinson; W B McCombs; C E McCoy; K C Mazur; N D Mabry
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Inference and validation of predictive gene networks from biomedical literature and gene expression data.

Authors:  Catharina Olsen; Kathleen Fleming; Niall Prendergast; Renee Rubio; Frank Emmert-Streib; Gianluca Bontempi; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; John Quackenbush
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2014-03-29       Impact factor: 5.736

5.  NCBI GEO: mining millions of expression profiles--database and tools.

Authors:  Tanya Barrett; Tugba O Suzek; Dennis B Troup; Stephen E Wilhite; Wing-Chi Ngau; Pierre Ledoux; Dmitry Rudnev; Alex E Lash; Wataru Fujibuchi; Ron Edgar
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.