Literature DB >> 26484086

Genome-wide copy number profiling to detect gene amplifications in neural progenitor cells.

U Fischer1, A Keller2, C Backes2, E Meese1.   

Abstract

DNA sequence amplification occurs at defined stages during normal development in amphibians and flies and seems to be restricted in humans to drug-resistant and tumor cells only. We used array-CGH to discover copy number changes including gene amplifications and deletions during differentiation of human neural progenitor cells. Here, we describe cell culture features, DNA extraction, and comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) analysis tailored towards the identification of genomic copy number changes. Further detailed analysis of amplified chromosome regions associated with this experiment, was published by Fischer and colleagues in PLOS One in 2012 (Fischer et al., 2012). We provide detailed information on deleted chromosome regions during differentiation and give an overview on copy number changes during differentiation induction for two representative chromosome regions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Copy number variation; Neural progenitor cells; aCHG

Year:  2014        PMID: 26484086      PMCID: PMC4535527          DOI: 10.1016/j.gdata.2014.06.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genom Data        ISSN: 2213-5960


Direct link to deposited data

Deposited data can be found here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE30636.

Experimental design, materials and methods

Cell culture and differentiation

NHNP cells (P1) were grown in 75 cm2 cell culture flasks with NPMM (neuronal progenitor maintenance medium) for initial 24 h after thawing. For the undifferentiated approach NHNP cells (approximately 4 × 105 cells) were cultivated for additional 24 h in NPMM, harvested and the cell pellet was frozen before DNA extraction. For differentiation induction NHNP cells were transferred to 25 cm2 laminin-coated cell culture flasks in NPDM (neural progenitor differentiation medium) supplemented with BDNF (brain-derived neurotrophic factor) at 25 ng/ml. We used approximately 4 × 105 cells for 24 h differentiation induction, approximately 2.5 × 105 cells for 48 h differentiation induction and approximately 2.5 × 105 cells for 5d differentiation induction approach. Cells were harvested and cell pellet was frozen before proceeding to DNA extraction.

DNA extraction

Cell pellets were resuspended in lysis buffer (75 mM NaCl, 25 mM EDTA, pH 8) with 10% SDS. Undifferentiated NHNP cells, 24 h differentiation-induced and 5d differentiation-induced NHNP cell pellets were treated with proteinase K for > 18 h at 55 °C. 48 h differentiation-induced NHNP cell pellets were treated with proteinase K for 5 h at 55 °C. All samples were extracted with 6 M NaCl/chloroform for 1 h on a rotator, centrifuged and the aqueous layer was precipitated with isopropanol and/or with sodium acetate ethanol. Genomic DNA from blood lymphocytes was extracted accordingly with proteinase K digest for > 18 h at 55 °C. Genomic DNA from male and female healthy individuals was pooled.

Array-CGH data analysis

The array-CGH experiments were done with independently derived primary cells with different lot numbers. Array data were deposited in GEO under accession number GSE30636. Signal intensity data were extracted from scanned images of each array using Roche NimbleGen NimbleScan v2.6 software. After spatial correction, the Cy3 and Cy5 signal intensities were normalized using qspline normalization. Following normalization a 10 × window-averaging step is applied. For amplification and deletion detection we used the dynamic segMNT algorithm that identifies segments by minimizing the squared error relative to the segment means. To detect representative alterations and to minimize the identification of random alterations, we extracted segments with segment means greater 0.1 threshold and a size greater than 250 kb. Deletions detected in undifferentiated, 24 h differentiated, 48 h differentiated and 5 d-differentiated NHNP cells were summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Overview of deleted chromosome regions.

Start and end points of deleted chromosome regions are according to NCBI36/HG18.

Deleted chromosomal regions in undifferentiated NHNP cells
Deleted chromosome regions in 1d differentiating NHNP cells
Deleted chromosome regions in 2d differentiating NHNP cells
Deleted chromosome regions in 5d differentiating NHNP cells
StartEndlog2Size (Mb)StartEndlog2Size (Mb)StartEndlog2Size (Mb)StartEndlog2Size (Mb)
chr1150737499151562499− 0.1450.82chr1150512499150937499− 0.2670.42
chr119624992837499− 0.1570.87
chr28903749989887499− 0.1210.85
chr29126249994762499− 0.1743.50
chr2116887499118062499− 0.1261.17
chr2132212499132762499− 0.1530.55
chr31331249913712499− 0.1050.40
chr35013749950562499− 0.1480.42
chr3128587499128912499− 0.1170.32
chr46921249970112499− 0.1000.90
chr52206249930987499− 0.1108.92
chr52658749927012499− 0.1450.42
chr54406249949762499− 0.1095.70
chr56891249970687499− 0.1231.77chr56891249970687499− 0.1391.77chr56893749970687499− 0.1881.75
chr5104487499105012499− 0.1570.52
chr5177487499177787499− 0.129030
chr65721249968587499− 0.10011.37
chr6140462499141187499− 0.1020.72
chr87178749972112499− 0.1050.32
chr81538749915737499− 0.1090.35
chr91033749911612499− 0.1091.27
chr92823749932287499− 0.1064.05
chr93878749940412499− 0.1501.62
chr94063749943612499− 0.1002.97
chr94386249966987499− 0.13023.12
chr96698749967262499− 0.1820.27
chr9138112499139262499− 0.1781.15
chr1082374999287499− 0.1061.05
chr105588749956487499− 0.1360.60
chr10130087499135326317− 0.1145.23
chr114831249949662499− 0.1261.35
chr114976249956637499− 0.1046.87
chr122866249928937499− 0.1070.27
chr125943749959762499− 0.1460.32
chr127146249972062499− 0.1530.60
chr12123337499123612499− 0.1660.27
chr131833749918612499− 0.1160.27
chr135298749957062499− 0.1074.07
chr13112387499114108681− 0.1031.72
chr141813749918412499− 0.1000.27chr141813749918412499− 0.2240.27
chr157563749975962499− 0.1320.32
chr1612124991487499− 0.2100.27
chr163368749934312499− 0.1280.62
chr163463749945137499− 0.11410.5chr163461249935037499− 0.1500.42
chr168391249984237499− 0.2120.32
chr172186249922137499− 0.1450.27
chr181396249914412499− 0.1010.45
chr192408749932887499− 0.1728.80chr192428749933037499− 0.1398.75
chr202583749928087499− 0.1392.25chr202583749929437499− 0.1283.60
The array plots at 25 kb resolution obtained by segmentation algorithm impressively demonstrate changes of the complex pattern of different copy numbers along a given chromosome. Fig. 1 summarizes the array plots for all probes of chromosome 12 and Fig. 2 of the array plots of all probes for chromosome 17. Interestingly at day zero the pattern of log2 ratios appears rather smooth. However, only after a 1 day-differentiation a wavy pattern appears that increases in number and amplitude heights over time. Recently, several studies explained the wavy CGH pattern by DNA extraction and replication timing [1], [2]. Our results, however, do not support this hypothesis as we detected wavy CGH pattern indicative of imbalances in cells seeded for differentiation in different cell densities. In addition, DNA digestion with proteinase K for 5 h or > 18 h did not lead to reduction of the wavy CGH pattern. In fact after 5d of differentiation and after more than 18 h protein digest we detected the highest amplitudes for copy number changes as shown in Fig. 1, Fig. 2. Further gene amplification analysis using fluorescence in situ hybridization confirmed our results [3].
Fig. 1

Copy number changes of chromosome 12 after differentiation induction.

Representative log2 ratio plots at 25 kb resolution for undifferentiated (0d), and for 1d, 2d and 5d differentiated NHNP cells were shown with base count on the x-axis and log2 ratio on the y-axis. Red bars depict extracted segments.

Fig. 2

Copy number changes of chromosome 17 after differentiation induction.

Representative log2 ratio plots at 25 kb resolution for undifferentiated (0d), and for 1d, 2d and 5d differentiated NHNP cells were shown with base count on the x-axis and log2 ratio on the y-axis. Red bars depict extracted segments.

Discussion

Here, we report detailed information on DNA extraction method used for detection of copy number changes using NimbleGen 730K whole genome array. Here and in our previous report we detected a complex pattern of amplifications and deletions. This wavy pattern of copy number changes was independent from cell number and protein digest duration. This dataset is a first step towards uncovering copy number changes upon differentiation in human stem cells.
Specifications
Organism/cell line/tissueHomo sapiens
SexMale
Sequencer or array typeNimbleGen 720 K human whole genome tiling arrays.
Data formatRaw data: PAIR file, analyzed data: txt file
Experimental factorsNHNP cells vs normal mixed blood lymphocytes, NHNP cells at various time points of differentiation
Experimental featuresNHNP cells were grown in Maintenance medium for 24 h. Differentiation was induced by withdrawal of EGF and FGF and addition of BDNF. Array-CGH experiments were done before differentiation, 24 h, 2d and 5d after differentiation induction.
Consentn/a
Sample source locationNHNP cells form Lonza, Walkersville Inc. MD, USA
  3 in total

1.  Replication timing influences DNA copy number determination by array-CGH.

Authors:  Georgi Manukjan; Marcel Tauscher; Doris Steinemann
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.993

2.  Genome-wide gene amplification during differentiation of neural progenitor cells in vitro.

Authors:  Ulrike Fischer; Andreas Keller; Meike Voss; Christina Backes; Cornelius Welter; Eckart Meese
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Systematic biases in DNA copy number originate from isolation procedures.

Authors:  Sebastiaan van Heesch; Michal Mokry; Veronika Boskova; Wade Junker; Rajdeep Mehon; Pim Toonen; Ewart de Bruijn; James D Shull; Timothy J Aitman; Edwin Cuppen; Victor Guryev
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 13.583

  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  Genome-wide copy number profiling of mouse neural stem cells during differentiation.

Authors:  U Fischer; N Ludwig; A Keller; C Backes; E Meese
Journal:  Genom Data       Date:  2015-05-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.