| Literature DB >> 26483960 |
A A Alekseeva1, I S Kargov2, S Yu Kleimenov3, S S Savin2, V I Tishkov4.
Abstract
Recently, we demonstrated that the amino acid substitutions Ala267Met and Ala267Met/Ile272Val (Alekseeva et al., Biochemistry, 2012), Phe290Asp, Phe290Asn and Phe290Ser (Alekseeva et al., Prot. Eng. Des. Select, 2012) in recombinant formate dehydrogenase from soya Glycine max (SoyFDH) lead to a significant (up to 30-100 times) increase in the thermal stability of the enzyme. The substitutions Phe290Asp, Phe290Asn and Phe290Ser were introduced into double mutant SoyFDH Ala267Met/Ile272Val by site-directed mutagenesis. Combinations of three substitutions did not lead to a noticeable change in the catalytic properties of the mutant enzymes. The stability of the resultant triple mutants was studied through thermal inactivation kinetics and differential scanning calorimetry. The thermal stability of the new mutant SoyFDHs was shown to be much higher than that of their precursors. The stability of the best mutant SoyFDH Ala267Met/Ile272Val/Phe290Asp turned out to be comparable to that of the most stable wild-type formate dehydrogenases from other sources. The results obtained with both methods indicate a great synergistic contribution of individual amino acid substitutions to the common stabilization effect.Entities:
Keywords: Glycine max; formate dehydrogenase; multi-point mutants; protein engineering; rational design; stability; stabilization; synergistic effect
Year: 2015 PMID: 26483960 PMCID: PMC4610165
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Naturae ISSN: 2075-8251 Impact factor: 1.845
Activation parameters ΔH≠ and ΔS≠ for thermal inactivation of wild-type and mutant SoyFDHs and wild-type formate dehydrogenases from various sources (0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer, pH7.0)
| Enzyme |
ΔH≠, |
ΔS≠, | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| wt-SoyFDH | 370 ± 20 | 830 ± 60 | [ |
| SoyFDHM1(A267M) | 400 | 900 | [ |
| SoyFDH M1+M2 (A267M/I272V) | 450±30 | 1,040±80 | [ |
| SoyFDHM5 (F290D) | 520±30 | 1,240±70 | [ |
| SoyFDHM3 (F290N) | 450±20 | 1,050±60 | [ |
| SoyFDHM5 (F290S) | 440±20 | 1,020±70 | [ |
| SoyFDH M1+M2+M3 | 500±30 | 1,190±90 | Present |
| SoyFDH M1+M2+M4 | 540±20 | 1,310±50 | Present |
| SoyFDH M1+M2+M5 | 450±30 | 1,050±80 | Present |
| wt-AthFDH* | 490 | 1,200 | [ |
| wt-PseFDH* | 570 | 1,390 | [ |
| wt-CboFDH* | 500 | 1360 | [ |
| wt-SceFDH* | 420 | n.d.** | [ |
* AthFDH, PseFDH, CboFDH, and SceFDH are formate dehydrogenases from plant A. thaliana, bacterium Pseudomonassp.101,and yeast C. boidinii and Saccharomices cerevisiae, respectively.
**n.d. – no data
Kinetic parameters of wild-type and mutant SoyFDHs compared to those of formate dehydrogenases from other sources
| Enzyme |
kcat, |
Kmformate, |
KmNAD+, |
kcat/KmNAD+, |
kcat/Kmformate, | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| wt-SoyFDH | 2.9 | 1.5 | 13.3 | 0.22 | 1.93 | [ |
| SoyFDHM1 | 5.0 | 2.1 | 9.9 | 0.51 | 2.38 | [ |
| SoyFDH M1+M2 | 2.2 | 2.4 | 13.3 | 0.17 | 0.92 | [ |
| SoyFDH M3 | 2.8 | 4.5 | 14.0 | 0.40 | 1.02 | [ |
| SoyFDH M4 | 5.1 | 5.0 | 12.8 | 0.20 | 0.62 | [ |
| SoyFDH M5 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 9.1 | 0.45 | 1.00 | [ |
| SoyFDH M1+M2+M3 | 3.2±0.2 | 2.2±0.3 | 14.1±0.7 | 0.23 | 1.45 | Present |
| SoyFDH M1+M2+M4 | 2.9±0.2 | 2.8±0.4 | 20.3±1.3 | 0.14 | 1.04 | Present |
| SoyFDH M1+M2+M5 | 3.7±0.1 | 2.3±0.3 | 16.1±0.4 | 0.23 | 1.61 | Present |
| wt-AthFDH | 3.8 | 2.8 | 50 | 0.08 | 1.36 | [ |
| wt-LjaFDH | 1.2 | 6.1 | 25.9 | 0.05 | 0.20 | [ |
| wt-CboFDH | 3.7 | 5.9 | 45 | 0.08 | 0.63 | [ |
| wt-MorFDH | 7.3 | 7.5 | 80 | 0.09 | 0.97 | [ |
| wt-PseFDH | 7.3 | 6.5 | 65 | 0.11 | 1.12 | [ |
| PseFDHGAV | 7.3 | 6 | 35 | 0.21 | 1.22 | [ |
| PseFDHSM4 | 7.3 | 3.2 | 41 | 0.18 | 2.28 | Own data |
PseFDH, MorFDH, CboFDH, AraFDH, and LjaFDH are formate dehydrogenases from bacteria Pseudomonas sp.101 and Moraxella sp. C1, yeast Candida boidinii, and plants Arabidopsis thaliana and Lotus japonicus, respectively.
Stabilization effect* for mutant SoyFDHs compared to the wild-type enzyme at various temperatures (0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer, pН7.0)
|
T, | Stabilization effect | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7** | 8 | 9** | 10 | 11** | 12 | |
| wt-SoyFDH |
SoyFDH |
SoyFDH М1+М2 |
SoyFDH М3 |
SoyFDH М4 |
SoyFDH М5 |
Stab.eff. |
SoyFDH |
Stab.eff. |
SoyFDH |
Stab.eff. |
SoyFDH | |
| 25 | 1 | 9 | 130 | 200 | 11,000 | 52 | 26,000 | 9.200 | 1,430,000 | 233,200 | 6,760 | 450 |
| 30 | 1 | 7 | 81 | 120 | 4,100 | 33 | 9,720 | 3,820 | 332,100 | 73,540 | 2,673 | 265 |
| 46 | 1 | 4.3 | 18 | 25 | 230 | 8.8 | 450 | 280 | 4,140 | 2,330 | 158 | 54 |
| 48 | 1 | 4 | 15 | 20 | 160 | 7.5 | 300 | 188 | 2,400 | 1,440 | 114 | 41 |
| 50 | 1 | 3.8 | 13 | 17 | 120 | 6.5 | 221 | 148 | 1,560 | 1,030 | 85 | 37 |
| 52 | 1 | 3.6 | 11 | 15 | 85 | 5.5 | 165 | 135 | 935 | 856 | 61 | 38 |
| 54 | 1 | 3.4 | 8.9 | 12 | 61 | 4.8 | 107 | 76 | 5,439 | 436 | 43 | 24 |
| 56 | 1 | 3.2 | 7.5 | 10 | 44 | 4.1 | 75 | 58 | 330 | 308 | 30.8 | 21 |
| 58 | 1 | 3 | 6.4 | 8.6 | 32 | 3.5 | 55 | 50 | 205 | 218 | 22 | 19 |
| 60 | 1 | 2.8 | 5.4 | 7.3 | 23 | 3.1 | 39 | 32 | 124 | 160 | 17 | 14 |
| 52 | 1 | 2.7 | 4.6 | 6.1 | 17 | 2.7 | 28 | 23 | 78 | 93 | 12 | 11 |
| 64 | 1 | 2.5 | 3.9 | 5.2 | 12 | 2.3 | 20 | 22 | 47 | 71 | 9 | 12 |
| 66 | 1 | 15 | 51 | 9 | ||||||||
*Stabilization effect was calculated as the (kin)wt/(kin)mut ratio at the same temperature. Values shown in bold were calculated using experimental constants. The other values of the stabilization effect were calculated using the transition state theory equation and appropriate activation parameters ΔH≠ and ΔS≠ from Table 2.
**Columns 7, 9 and 11 show the theoretical stabilization effect in the case of 100% additivity. These values were calculated as multiplication of the stabilization effect for double mutant Soy FDH (М1+М2) and the stabilization effect for a mutation at the 290th position.
Data of differential scanning calorimetry for wild-type and mutant formate dehydrogenases from various sources (0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer, pН 7.0)
| Enzyme |
Melting temperature, |
Tm–Tmwt-SoyFDH, |
Cooperativity value, | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| wt-PseFDH* | 67.6 | 10.6 | 5.4 | [ |
| PseFDH GAV* | 68.8 | 11.8 | 5.4 | [ |
| wt-MorFDH** | 63.4 | 6.4 | 4.9 | [ |
| wt-AthFDH** | 64.9 | 7.9 | 5.9 | [ |
| wt-CboFDH** | 64.4 | 7.4 | 5.3 | [ |
| wt-SoyFDH** | 57.0 | 0.0 | 7.1 | [ |
| SoyFDH М1 | 59.7 | 2.7 | 7.5 | [ |
| SoyFDHМ1+М2 | 61.6 | 4.6 | 6.8 | [ |
| SoyFDHF290D | 64.8 | 7.8 | 5.0 | [ |
| SoyFDHF290N | 61.3 | 4.3 | 6.6 | [ |
| SoyFDH F290S | 59.9 | 2.9 | 6.4 | [ |
| SoyFDH М1+М2+М3 | 64.9 | 7.9 | 5.8 | Present |
| SoyFDH М1+М2+М4 | 67.3 | 10.3 | 4.8 | Present |
| SoyFDHМ1+М2+М5 | 63.7 | 6.7 | 5.6 | Present |
* wt-PseFDH and PseFDH GAV are wild-type and mutant formate dehydrogenases from bacterium Pseudomonas sp.101,, respectively [2].
** wt-MorFDH, wt-CboFDH, and wt-AthFDH are wild-type recombinant formate dehydrogenases from bacterium Moraxella sp. C1, yeast C.boidinii, and plant A. thaliana, respectively.