Gaurav Nigam1, Charu Pathak2, Muhammad Riaz3. 1. Sleep Disorders Center, University of Michigan Health System, C728 Med Inn Bldg. 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5845, USA. dr.nigamgaurav@gmail.com. 2. Government Medical College, Nagpur Road, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, 482003, India. 3. Sleep Disorders Center, University of Michigan Health System, C728 Med Inn Bldg. 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5845, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Oral pressure therapy (OPT) has emerged as a novel technique to treat obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in the past few years. Given this is a relatively new treatment approach, currently, little is known with respect to its clinical utility. The aim of this review was to explore the success rate of OPT when used to treat OSA. METHODS: PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched for pertinent studies. RESULTS: The OPT treatment success rates varied widely between 25 and 79 % depending on the residual apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) cut off defined for treatment success. When using standard definitions (at least 50 % reduction from the baseline AHI and the post-OPT treatment residual AHI less than or equal to 10), the success rate of OPT treatment varied between 25 and 37 %. CONCLUSIONS: Although there was a significant reduction in AHI with OPT, the baseline AHI was not suppressed in majority of patients to the extent to call these patients as optimally treated. Successful treatment with OPT did not correlate with severity of OSA; however, patients with retro-palatal collapse responded better to treatment. Further research is needed to identify OSA patients who would benefit with this treatment modality.
PURPOSE: Oral pressure therapy (OPT) has emerged as a novel technique to treat obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in the past few years. Given this is a relatively new treatment approach, currently, little is known with respect to its clinical utility. The aim of this review was to explore the success rate of OPT when used to treat OSA. METHODS: PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched for pertinent studies. RESULTS: The OPT treatment success rates varied widely between 25 and 79 % depending on the residual apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) cut off defined for treatment success. When using standard definitions (at least 50 % reduction from the baseline AHI and the post-OPT treatment residual AHI less than or equal to 10), the success rate of OPT treatment varied between 25 and 37 %. CONCLUSIONS: Although there was a significant reduction in AHI with OPT, the baseline AHI was not suppressed in majority of patients to the extent to call these patients as optimally treated. Successful treatment with OPT did not correlate with severity of OSA; however, patients with retro-palatal collapse responded better to treatment. Further research is needed to identify OSA patients who would benefit with this treatment modality.
Authors: Richard J Schwab; C Kim; Lawrence Siegel; B T Keenan; Jed Black; Mehran Farid-Moayer; Jonathan Podmore; Matt Vaska Journal: Sleep Date: 2014-07-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Marijke Dieltjens; Marc J Braem; Paul H Van de Heyning; Kristien Wouters; Olivier M Vanderveken Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2014-09-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Simon A Joosten; Kais Hamza; Scott Sands; Anthony Turton; Philip Berger; Garun Hamilton Journal: Respirology Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 6.424
Authors: Paul E Peppard; Terry Young; Jodi H Barnet; Mari Palta; Erika W Hagen; Khin Mae Hla Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2013-04-14 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Olivier M Vanderveken; Joachim T Maurer; Winfried Hohenhorst; Evert Hamans; Ho-Sheng Lin; Anneclaire V Vroegop; Clemens Anders; Nico de Vries; Paul H Van de Heyning Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2013-05-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Clete A Kushida; Michael R Littner; Max Hirshkowitz; Timothy I Morgenthaler; Cathy A Alessi; Dennis Bailey; Brian Boehlecke; Terry M Brown; Jack Coleman; Leah Friedman; Sheldon Kapen; Vishesh K Kapur; Milton Kramer; Teofilo Lee-Chiong; Judith Owens; Jeffrey P Pancer; Todd J Swick; Merrill S Wise Journal: Sleep Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Y Suto; T Matsuo; T Kato; I Hori; Y Inoue; S Ogawa; T Suzuki; M Yamada; Y Ohta Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 1993-02 Impact factor: 3.959