Paul F Pinsky1, Barnett S Kramer2. 1. Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD pp4f@nih.gov. 2. Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Based on current recommendations, 30+ pack-years of smoking are required for eligibility for low-dose CT (LDCT) lung cancer screening; former smokers must have quit within 15 years. We investigated whether current smokers with 20 to 29 pack-years have similar lung cancer risks as eligible former smokers and also whether they have a different demographic profile. METHODS: The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO) was a randomly assigned screening trial of subjects age 55 to 74 years with chest radiographs (CXR) used for lung cancer. Subjects completed a baseline questionnaire containing smoking history questions. Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for age and sex, were utilized to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for various smoking history groups. Next, we utilized the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), which inquired about smoking history and race/ethnicity, to analyze the demographic profiles of various high-risk smoking history categories. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS:The PLCO cohort included 18 114 former and 12 243 current LDCT-eligible smokers, plus 2283 20- to 29-pack-year current smokers. The hazard ratio for 20- to 29-pack-year current smokers compared with eligible (30+ pack-year) former smokers was 1.07 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.75 to 1.5). Based on the NHIS, 10 million persons in the United States are currently LDCT eligible; an additional 1.6 million (16%, 95% CI = 13.6% to 19.0%) are 20- to 29-pack-year current smokers. The percentage increase in eligibles if 20- to 29-pack-year current smokers were included was substantially greater for women than men (22.2%, 95% CI = 17.9% to 26.7%; vs 12.2%, 95% CI = 9.3% to 15.3%, P < .001) and for minorities than non-Hispanic whites (30.0%, 95% CI = 24.2% to 36.0%; vs 14.1%, 95% CI = 11.1% to 17.0%, P < .001). CONCLUSION: The potential benefits and harms of recommending LDCT screening for 20 to 29-pack-year current smokers should be assessed. Published by Oxford University Press 2015. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Based on current recommendations, 30+ pack-years of smoking are required for eligibility for low-dose CT (LDCT) lung cancer screening; former smokers must have quit within 15 years. We investigated whether current smokers with 20 to 29 pack-years have similar lung cancer risks as eligible former smokers and also whether they have a different demographic profile. METHODS: The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO) was a randomly assigned screening trial of subjects age 55 to 74 years with chest radiographs (CXR) used for lung cancer. Subjects completed a baseline questionnaire containing smoking history questions. Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for age and sex, were utilized to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for various smoking history groups. Next, we utilized the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), which inquired about smoking history and race/ethnicity, to analyze the demographic profiles of various high-risk smoking history categories. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: The PLCO cohort included 18 114 former and 12 243 current LDCT-eligible smokers, plus 2283 20- to 29-pack-year current smokers. The hazard ratio for 20- to 29-pack-year current smokers compared with eligible (30+ pack-year) former smokers was 1.07 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.75 to 1.5). Based on the NHIS, 10 million persons in the United States are currently LDCT eligible; an additional 1.6 million (16%, 95% CI = 13.6% to 19.0%) are 20- to 29-pack-year current smokers. The percentage increase in eligibles if 20- to 29-pack-year current smokers were included was substantially greater for women than men (22.2%, 95% CI = 17.9% to 26.7%; vs 12.2%, 95% CI = 9.3% to 15.3%, P < .001) and for minorities than non-Hispanic whites (30.0%, 95% CI = 24.2% to 36.0%; vs 14.1%, 95% CI = 11.1% to 17.0%, P < .001). CONCLUSION: The potential benefits and harms of recommending LDCT screening for 20 to 29-pack-year current smokers should be assessed. Published by Oxford University Press 2015. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.
Authors: Michael J Thun; Brian D Carter; Diane Feskanich; Neal D Freedman; Ross Prentice; Alan D Lopez; Patricia Hartge; Susan M Gapstur Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-01-24 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ying Ru Zhao; Xueqian Xie; Harry J de Koning; Willem P Mali; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Matthijs Oudkerk Journal: Cancer Imaging Date: 2011-10-03 Impact factor: 3.909
Authors: Lauren R Meltzer; Marina Unrod; Vani N Simmons; Karen O Brandon; Bárbara Piñeiro; Amanda M Palmer; Thomas H Brandon Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2019-02-18 Impact factor: 5.705
Authors: Li C Cheung; Hormuzd A Katki; Anil K Chaturvedi; Ahmedin Jemal; Christine D Berg Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2018-01-02 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Summer S Han; Eric Chow; Kevin Ten Haaf; Iakovos Toumazis; Pianpian Cao; Mehrad Bastani; Martin Tammemagi; Jihyoun Jeon; Eric J Feuer; Rafael Meza; Sylvia K Plevritis Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2020-11-01 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Randi M Williams; Tengfei Li; George Luta; Min Qi Wang; Lucile Adams-Campbell; Rafael Meza; Martin C Tammemägi; Kathryn L Taylor Journal: Cancer Date: 2022-02-24 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Jennifer Richmond; Olive M Mbah; Sofia Z Dard; Lauren C Jordan; Katherine S Cools; Cleo A Samuel; Jalaal M Khan; Matthew A Manning Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2018-10-19 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Douglas E Wood; Ella A Kazerooni; Scott L Baum; George A Eapen; David S Ettinger; Lifang Hou; David M Jackman; Donald Klippenstein; Rohit Kumar; Rudy P Lackner; Lorriana E Leard; Inga T Lennes; Ann N C Leung; Samir S Makani; Pierre P Massion; Peter Mazzone; Robert E Merritt; Bryan F Meyers; David E Midthun; Sudhakar Pipavath; Christie Pratt; Chakravarthy Reddy; Mary E Reid; Arnold J Rotter; Peter B Sachs; Matthew B Schabath; Mark L Schiebler; Betty C Tong; William D Travis; Benjamin Wei; Stephen C Yang; Kristina M Gregory; Miranda Hughes Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 11.908