Literature DB >> 26482926

Suitability of the Quality of Life after Brain Injury Instrument for Older People with Traumatic Brain Injury.

Yen-Nung Lin1,2, Hei-Fen Hwang3, Yi-Ju Chen4, Chui-Hsuan Cheng5, Wen-Miin Liang6, Mau-Roung Lin1.   

Abstract

We prospectively investigated the psychometric properties of the Quality of Life after Brain Injury (QOLIBRI) instrument among older patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). The 37-item QOLIBRI comprises six domains (cognition, self, daily life and autonomy, social relationships, emotions, and physical problems). We recruited 333 patients ≥60 years of age with TBI from the neurosurgery clinics and emergency departments of three hospitals in Taipei, Taiwan. The ceiling and floor values for most QOLIBRI domains were <5%, and the internal consistency and test-retest reliability ranged from 0.84 to 0.97 and 0.83 to 0.96, respectively. For the known-groups validity, patients with TBI attained lower scores for all QOLIBRI domains, except physical problems, compared with those with soft-tissue injuries. Patients with intact cognition who had higher levels on the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) and the Glasgow Coma Scale, fewer limitations in activities of daily living, and fewer chronic conditions obtained higher scores for almost all the QOLIBRI domains, compared with their counterparts. For convergent validity, the correlation coefficients for the QOLIBRI domains and the selected functional measures conceptually related to that domain were all ≥0.4. A confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the original six-domain structure fit the data with a comparative fit index of ≥0.9. Effect sizes for changes in the GOSE over a 6-month follow-up period were clinically meaningful (≥ 0.2) for all the QOLIBRI domains except emotions. For older people with TBI, the use of the QOLIBRI is generally appropriate, and adding the domain of environment to the scale would be beneficial.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Taiwan; psychometrics; quality of life; traumatic brain injury

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26482926     DOI: 10.1089/neu.2015.4094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  3 in total

1.  Comparing the Quality of Life after Brain Injury-Overall Scale and Satisfaction with Life Scale as Outcome Measures for Traumatic Brain Injury Research.

Authors:  Natalie Kreitzer; Sonia Jain; Jacob S Young; Xiaoying Sun; Murray B Stein; Michael A McCrea; Harvey S Levin; Joseph T Giacino; Amy J Markowitz; Geoffrey T Manley; Lindsay D Nelson
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 5.269

2.  Comparison of Four Quality of Life Inventories for Patients with Traumatic Brain Injuries and Orthopedic Injuries.

Authors:  Elisabeth J Harfmann; Terri A deRoon-Cassini; Michael A McCrea; Amy M Nader; Lindsay D Nelson
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 4.869

3.  Quality of life measures in older adults after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review.

Authors:  Cindy Hunt; Shatabdy Zahid; Naomi Ennis; Alicja Michalak; Cheryl Masanic; Chantal Vaidyanath; Shree Bhalerao; Michael D Cusimano; Andrew Baker
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-09-14       Impact factor: 4.147

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.