Literature DB >> 26482540

Perspective distortion in craniofacial superimposition: Logarithmic decay curves mapped mathematically and by practical experiment.

Carl N Stephan1.   

Abstract

The superimposition of a face photograph with that of a skull for identification purposes necessitates the use of comparable photographic parameters between the two image acquisition sessions, so that differences in optics and consequent recording of images does not thwart the morphological analysis. Widely divergent, but published, speculations about the thresholds at which perspective distortion becomes negligible (0.5 to >13.5 m) must be resolved and perspective distortion (PD) relationships quantified across their full range to judge tolerance levels, and the suitability of commonly employed contemporary equipment (e.g., 1 m photographic copy-stands). Herein, basic trigonometry is employed to map PD for two same sized 179 mm linear lengths - separated anteroposteriorly by 127 mm - as a function of subject-to-camera distance (SCD; 0.2-20 m). These lengths approximate basic craniofacial heights (e.g., tr-n) and widths (e.g., zy-zy), while the latter approximates facial depth (e.g., n-t). As anticipated, PD decayed in logarithmic and continuous manner with increasing SCD. At SCD of 12 m, the within-image PD was negligible (<1%). At <2.5 m SCD, it exceeded 5% and increased sharply as SCD decreased. Since life size images of skulls and faces are commonly employed for superimposition, a relative 1% perspective distortion difference is recommended as the ceiling standard for craniofacial comparison (translates into a ≤2 mm difference in physiognomical face height). Since superimposition depends on relative comparisons of a photographic pair (not one photograph), there is practically no scenario in superimposition casework where SCDs should be ignored and no single distance at which PD should be considered negligible (even if one image holds >12 m SCD).
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Face; Forensic anthropology population data; Photographic comparison; Skeletal identification; Skull; Video superimposition

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26482540     DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.09.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int        ISSN: 0379-0738            Impact factor:   2.395


  6 in total

1.  A standardized nomenclature for craniofacial and facial anthropometry.

Authors:  Jodi Caple; Carl N Stephan
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 2.  An overview of the latest developments in facial imaging.

Authors:  Carl N Stephan; Jodi M Caple; Pierre Guyomarc'h; Peter Claes
Journal:  Forensic Sci Res       Date:  2018-10-29

3.  Development of the Wits Face Database: an African database of high-resolution facial photographs and multimodal closed-circuit television (CCTV) recordings.

Authors:  Nicholas Bacci; Joshua Davimes; Maryna Steyn; Nanette Briers
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2021-02-19

Review 4.  Craniofacial superimposition: a review of focus distance estimation methods and an extension to profile view photographs.

Authors:  Carl N Stephan; Sean Healy; Hamish Bultitude; Chris Glen
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 2.791

Review 5.  Craniofacial photographic superimposition: New developments.

Authors:  Douglas H Ubelaker; Yaohan Wu; Quinnlan R Cordero
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 6.  Forensic Facial Comparison: Current Status, Limitations, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Nicholas Bacci; Joshua G Davimes; Maryna Steyn; Nanette Briers
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.