Literature DB >> 26482374

Prognostic impact of a single-nucleotide polymorphism near the CTSO gene in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients.

Yukari Hato1, Naoto Kondo1, Nobuyasu Yoshimoto1, Yumi Endo1, Tomoko Asano1, Yu Dong1, Mayumi Nishimoto1, Satoru Takahashi2, Yoshitaka Fujii1, Ryoichi Nakanishi1, Tatsuya Toyama3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tamoxifen can reduce the occurrence of breast cancer by a half in high-risk women. Recently, a genome-wide association study identified two single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) near or in the CTSO and ZNF423 genes that were associated with breast cancer risk during tamoxifen therapy. We hypothesized that these two SNPs could be associated with increased recurrence in breast cancer patients who received adjuvant tamoxifen therapy.
METHODS: A total of 586 breast carcinomas were available for SNP genotyping assays. TaqMan pre-designed SNP genotyping assays were used to identify the presence of CTSO rs10030044 and ZNF423 rs8060157. We then investigated the relationship between CTSO rs10030044 genotypes and mRNA expression levels of CTSO and BRCA1 in 290 breast cancer patients.
RESULTS: We found a positive correlation between the variant GG genotype of CTSO rs10030044 and shorter disease-free survival, or overall survival in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant tamoxifen therapy. In contrast, this genotype was not associated with prognosis in hormone receptor-negative breast cancer patients. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that this genotype was an independent factor indicating a poor prognosis in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant tamoxifen therapy. No association was found between CTSO genotype and mRNA expression of CTSO and BRCA1. ZNF423 rs8060157 genotype was not associated with prognosis in this study.
CONCLUSION: We show that a SNP near the CTSO gene is a poor prognostic factor in breast cancer although further research might help to reveal the factors linking this genotype and prognosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; CTSO; Estrogen receptor; Hormone receptor; Polymorphism; Tamoxifen

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26482374     DOI: 10.1007/s10147-015-0913-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1341-9625            Impact factor:   3.402


  18 in total

Review 1.  Mammalian Krüppel-like transcription factors: more than just a pretty finger.

Authors:  J Turner; M Crossley
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 13.807

2.  Effects of tamoxifen vs raloxifene on the risk of developing invasive breast cancer and other disease outcomes: the NSABP Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR) P-2 trial.

Authors:  Victor G Vogel; Joseph P Costantino; D Lawrence Wickerham; Walter M Cronin; Reena S Cecchini; James N Atkins; Therese B Bevers; Louis Fehrenbacher; Eduardo R Pajon; James L Wade; André Robidoux; Richard G Margolese; Joan James; Scott M Lippman; Carolyn D Runowicz; Patricia A Ganz; Steven E Reis; Worta McCaskill-Stevens; Leslie G Ford; V Craig Jordan; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  BRCA1 expression is not directly responsive to estrogen.

Authors:  J R Marks; G Huper; J P Vaughn; P L Davis; J Norris; D P McDonnell; R W Wiseman; P A Futreal; J D Iglehart
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  1997-01-09       Impact factor: 9.867

4.  Tamoxifen for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-05-16       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  J M Harvey; G M Clark; C K Osborne; D C Allred
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Update of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR) P-2 Trial: Preventing breast cancer.

Authors:  Victor G Vogel; Joseph P Costantino; D Lawrence Wickerham; Walter M Cronin; Reena S Cecchini; James N Atkins; Therese B Bevers; Louis Fehrenbacher; Eduardo R Pajon; James L Wade; André Robidoux; Richard G Margolese; Joan James; Carolyn D Runowicz; Patricia A Ganz; Steven E Reis; Worta McCaskill-Stevens; Leslie G Ford; V Craig Jordan; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2010-04-19

7.  Genomic structure and chromosomal localization of the human cathepsin O gene (CTSO).

Authors:  I Santamaría; A M Pendás; G Velasco; C López-Otín
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1998-10-15       Impact factor: 5.736

8.  Human cathepsin O. Molecular cloning from a breast carcinoma, production of the active enzyme in Escherichia coli, and expression analysis in human tissues.

Authors:  G Velasco; A A Ferrando; X S Puente; L M Sánchez; C López-Otín
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1994-10-28       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Selective estrogen receptor modulators and pharmacogenomic variation in ZNF423 regulation of BRCA1 expression: individualized breast cancer prevention.

Authors:  James N Ingle; Mohan Liu; D Lawrence Wickerham; Daniel J Schaid; Liewei Wang; Taisei Mushiroda; Michiaki Kubo; Joseph P Costantino; Victor G Vogel; Soonmyung Paik; Matthew P Goetz; Matthew M Ames; Gregory D Jenkins; Anthony Batzler; Erin E Carlson; David A Flockhart; Norman Wolmark; Yusuke Nakamura; Richard M Weinshilboum
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 39.397

10.  SHROOM3 is a novel candidate for heterotaxy identified by whole exome sequencing.

Authors:  Muhammad Tariq; John W Belmont; Seema Lalani; Teresa Smolarek; Stephanie M Ware
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Cysteine Cathepsins in Breast Cancer: Promising Targets for Fluorescence-Guided Surgery.

Authors:  Daan G J Linders; Okker D Bijlstra; Laura C Fallert; Denise E Hilling; Ethan Walker; Brian Straight; Taryn L March; A Rob P M Valentijn; Martin Pool; Jacobus Burggraaf; James P Basilion; Alexander L Vahrmeijer; Peter J K Kuppen
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 3.484

2.  Integrative genomic analysis identifies associations of molecular alterations to APOBEC and BRCA1/2 mutational signatures in breast cancer.

Authors:  Victor Trevino
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 2.183

3.  Molecular markers associated with the outcome of tamoxifen treatment in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients: scoping review and in silico analysis.

Authors:  Maiquidieli Dal Berto; Giovana Tavares Dos Santos; Aniúsca Vieira Dos Santos; Andrew Oliveira Silva; José Eduardo Vargas; Rafael José Vargas Alves; Fernanda Barbisan; Ivana Beatrice Mânica da Cruz; Claudia Giuliano Bica
Journal:  Discov Oncol       Date:  2021-10-01

Review 4.  ZNF423: A New Player in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Heather M Bond; Stefania Scicchitano; Emanuela Chiarella; Nicola Amodio; Valeria Lucchino; Annamaria Aloisio; Ylenia Montalcini; Maria Mesuraca; Giovanni Morrone
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 5.555

5.  SNPs near the cysteine proteinase cathepsin O gene (CTSO) determine tamoxifen sensitivity in ERα-positive breast cancer through regulation of BRCA1.

Authors:  Junmei Cairns; James N Ingle; Lawrence D Wickerham; Richard Weinshilboum; Mohan Liu; Liewei Wang
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 5.917

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.