| Literature DB >> 26482368 |
P Zachar1, R F Krueger2, K S Kendler3.
Abstract
As the revision process leading to DSM-5 began, the domain of personality disorder embodied the highest aspirations for major change. After an initial prototype-based proposal failed to gain acceptance, the Personality and Personality Disorders Work Group (P&PDWG) developed a hybrid model containing categorical and dimensional components. A clash of perspectives both within the P&PDWG and between the P&PDWG and DSM-5 oversight committees led to the rejection of this proposal from the main body of DSM-5. Major issues included conflicting ways of conceptualizing validation, differences of opinion from personality disorder experts outside the P&PDWG, divergent concepts of the magnitude of evidence needed to support substantial changes, and the disagreements about clinical utility of the hybrid model. Despite these setbacks, the 'Alternative DSM-5 Model of Personality Disorder' is presented in Section III of the DSM-5. Further research should clarify its performance relative to the DSM-IV criteria reprinted in the main DSM-5 text.Entities:
Keywords: DSM-5; history; personality disorder
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26482368 DOI: 10.1017/S0033291715001543
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Psychol Med ISSN: 0033-2917 Impact factor: 7.723