Literature DB >> 26482196

3D scaffold alters cellular response to graphene in a polymer composite for orthopedic applications.

Sachin Kumar1, Dilkash Azam1, Shammy Raj1, Elayaraja Kolanthai1, K S Vasu2, A K Sood2, Kaushik Chatterjee1.   

Abstract

Graphene-based polymer nanocomposites are being studied for biomedical applications. Polymer nanocomposites can be processed differently to generate planar two-dimensional (2D) substrates and porous three-dimensional (3D) scaffolds. The objective of this work was to investigate potential differences in biological response to graphene in polymer composites in the form of 2D substrates and 3D scaffolds. Polycaprolactone (PCL) nanocomposites were prepared by incorporating 1% of graphene oxide (GO) and reduced graphene oxide (RGO). GO increased modulus and strength of PCL by 44 and 22% respectively, whereas RGO increased modulus and strength by 22 and 16%, respectively. RGO increased the water contact angle of PCL from 81° to 87° whereas GO decreased it to 77°. In 2D, osteoblast proliferated 15% more on GO composites than on PCL whereas RGO composite showed 17% decrease in cell proliferation, which may be attributed to differences in water wettability. In 3D, initial cell proliferation was markedly retarded in both GO (36% lower) and RGO (55% lower) composites owing to increased roughness due to the presence of the protruding nanoparticles. Cells organized into aggregates in 3D in contrast to spread and randomly distributed cells on 2D discs due to the macro-porous architecture of the scaffolds. Increased cell-cell contact and altered cellular morphology led to significantly higher mineralization in 3D. This study demonstrates that the cellular response to nanoparticles in composites can change markedly by varying the processing route and has implications for designing orthopedic implants such as resorbable fracture fixation devices and tissue scaffolds using such nanocomposites.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone tissue engineering; graphene; nanotoxicology; osteoblasts; polymer nanocomposites

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26482196     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.33549

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater        ISSN: 1552-4973            Impact factor:   3.368


  3 in total

Review 1.  Graphene-based 3D scaffolds in tissue engineering: fabrication, applications, and future scope in liver tissue engineering.

Authors:  Renu Geetha Bai; Kasturi Muthoosamy; Sivakumar Manickam; Ali Hilal-Alnaqbi
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2019-07-24

Review 2.  Development of Graphene-Based Materials in Bone Tissue Engineaering.

Authors:  Xiaoling Pan; Delin Cheng; Changshun Ruan; Yonglong Hong; Cheng Lin
Journal:  Glob Chall       Date:  2021-12-02

3.  Spatial Control of Cell-Nanosurface Interactions by Tantalum Oxide Nanodots for Improved Implant Geometry.

Authors:  Udesh Dhawan; Hsu An Pan; Chia Hui Lee; Ying Hao Chu; Guewha Steven Huang; Yan Ren Lin; Wen Liang Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.