Literature DB >> 26482022

Authors' reply.

S B Yadav1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26482022      PMCID: PMC4943368     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Postgrad Med        ISSN: 0022-3859            Impact factor:   1.476


× No keyword cloud information.
Sir, We acknowledge the comments of Raina.[1] The aim of our study was to see the prevalence and risk factors associated with gestational diabetes using the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria.[2] We concur with Raina on the limitations of the use of body mass index (BMI) in pregnancy although the literature does include studies that have used BMI.[3] The BMI data were not used for statistical analysis. For defining the socioeconomic status, the Kuppuswamy scale was used.[4] The study though was done in three referral hospitals of Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India with most patients coming from urban areas.
  3 in total

1.  ATLANTIC-DIP: raised maternal body mass index (BMI) adversely affects maternal and fetal outcomes in glucose-tolerant women according to International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria.

Authors:  Michael Conall Dennedy; Gloria Avalos; Michael W O'Reilly; Eoin P O'Sullivan; Geraldine Gaffney; Fidelma Dunne
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 5.958

2.  Evaluation of the prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in North Indians using the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study groups (IADPSG) criteria.

Authors:  V Gopalakrishnan; R Singh; Y Pradeep; D Kapoor; A K Rani; S Pradhan; E Bhatia; S B Yadav
Journal:  J Postgrad Med       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.476

3.  Conducting evaluation in gestational diabetes.

Authors:  S K Raina
Journal:  J Postgrad Med       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.476

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.