Literature DB >> 26481504

Medical consultations about fertility preservation with haematological patients of childbearing age: A qualitative study.

Diana Richter1, Kristina Geue2, Annekathrin Sender2, Uwe Paasch3, Elmar Brähler4, Yve Stöbel-Richter5, Jochen Ernst2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Oncological treatments can cause serious long-term consequences, including effects on patients' fertility. Communication about possible fertility impairment is essential for cancer patients who want to have children. When oncologists initiate this discussion in a timely manner, patients can be referred to fertility specialists and avail themselves of fertility preservation methods. The oncologist plays a key role in this context.
METHODS: 30 cancer patients of childbearing age (21-43 years) took part in semi-structured interviews between March 2011 and April 2012 about fertility and their desire to have children. Interview transcripts were thematically analyzed.
RESULTS: Physician-patient consultations broached the issue as a central theme in almost all patients. A few consultations were patient initiated, and the majority took place before the beginning of treatment. Almost half of the patients were satisfied with their consultations and were referred to a fertility specialist. The ideal setting for these conversations is in the presence of the patient's partner, in a private space, before the beginning of treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: All patients should be informed about the possibility of their fertility being impaired due to treatments, even if they have not explicitly expressed wanting children. The oncologist is the first and most important contact for the patient and, hence, should bring up the issue of family planning and fertility. An interdisciplinary communication and collaboration between oncologists and fertility specialists can improve patient care.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Childbearing age; Desire to have a child; Fertility preservation; Oncology; Physician–patient-communication; Qualitative research

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26481504     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2015.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Oncol Nurs        ISSN: 1462-3889            Impact factor:   2.398


  4 in total

1.  The effects of an educational program for non-physician health care providers regarding fertility preservation.

Authors:  Emi Takeuchi; Masashi Kato; Kayoko Miyata; Nao Suzuki; Chikako Shimizu; Hiroshi Okada; Naoko Matsunaga; Mariko Shimizu; Natsuko Moroi; Daisuke Fujisawa; Masaru Mimura; Yoko Miyoshi
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-04-21       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  Oncofertility-An emerging discipline rather than a special consideration.

Authors:  Antoinette Anazodo; Lauren Ataman-Millhouse; Yasmin Jayasinghe; Teresa K Woodruff
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 3.167

3.  How can we improve oncofertility care for patients? A systematic scoping review of current international practice and models of care.

Authors:  Antoinette Anazodo; Paula Laws; Shanna Logan; Carla Saunders; Jo Travaglia; Brigitte Gerstl; Natalie Bradford; Richard Cohn; Mary Birdsall; Ronald Barr; Nao Suzuki; Seido Takae; Ricardo Marinho; Shuo Xiao; Chen Qiong-Hua; Nalini Mahajan; Madhuri Patil; Devika Gunasheela; Kristen Smith; Leonard Sender; Cláudia Melo; Teresa Almeida-Santos; Mahmoud Salama; Leslie Appiah; Irene Su; Sheila Lane; Teresa K Woodruff; Allan Pacey; Richard A Anderson; Francoise Shenfield; William Ledger; Elizabeth Sullivan
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 15.610

Review 4.  Integration of partners of young women with cancer in oncofertility evidence-based informational resources.

Authors:  Vânia Gonçalves; Pedro L Ferreira; Gwendolyn P Quinn
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-08-30       Impact factor: 4.452

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.