Tomohiro F Nishijima1, Hyman B Muss2, Shlomit S Shachar2, Kazuo Tamura3, Yasushi Takamatsu3. 1. UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, 170 Manning Drive, CB# 7305, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. Electronic address: tomohiro.funakoshi@unchealth.unc.edu. 2. UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, 170 Manning Drive, CB# 7305, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. 3. Division of Medical Oncology, Hematology and Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Fukuoka University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The immune system plays an important role in cancer pathogenesis. A low lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), as a simple biomarker of host immune system, has been suggested to be related to poor prognosis in various cancers. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify the prognostic value of LMR on clinical outcomes in non-hematologic solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We searched PubMed and the ASCO online database of meeting abstracts up to July 2015 for relevant studies. We included studies assessing the prognostic impact of pre-treatment LMR on clinical outcomes in patients with non-hematologic solid tumors. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and the secondary outcomes were cancer-specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS). The summary hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 11,197 patients from 29 studies were included. LMR lower than the cut-off was associated with poor OS (HR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.55-1.93; P<0.001), CCS (HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.27-1.91; P<0.001) and DFS (HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.31-1.86; P<0.001). The effect of LMR on OS was observed in among various tumor types and across disease stages. The median cut-off value for LMR was 3.0 (range=2.0-5.3). Subgroup analysis according to cut-off value (<3.0, 3.0 to <4.0, 4.0 to <5.0, and ≧5.0) showed a significant prognostic value of LMR on OS in all subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: A low pre-treatment LMR seems to represent an unfavorable and robust prognostic factor for clinical outcomes in patients with non-hematologic malignancies. FUNDING: None.
BACKGROUND: The immune system plays an important role in cancer pathogenesis. A low lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), as a simple biomarker of host immune system, has been suggested to be related to poor prognosis in various cancers. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify the prognostic value of LMR on clinical outcomes in non-hematologic solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We searched PubMed and the ASCO online database of meeting abstracts up to July 2015 for relevant studies. We included studies assessing the prognostic impact of pre-treatment LMR on clinical outcomes in patients with non-hematologic solid tumors. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and the secondary outcomes were cancer-specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS). The summary hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 11,197 patients from 29 studies were included. LMR lower than the cut-off was associated with poor OS (HR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.55-1.93; P<0.001), CCS (HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.27-1.91; P<0.001) and DFS (HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.31-1.86; P<0.001). The effect of LMR on OS was observed in among various tumor types and across disease stages. The median cut-off value for LMR was 3.0 (range=2.0-5.3). Subgroup analysis according to cut-off value (<3.0, 3.0 to <4.0, 4.0 to <5.0, and ≧5.0) showed a significant prognostic value of LMR on OS in all subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: A low pre-treatment LMR seems to represent an unfavorable and robust prognostic factor for clinical outcomes in patients with non-hematologic malignancies. FUNDING: None.
Authors: Martin Grimm; Johan Rieth; Sebastian Hoefert; Michael Krimmel; Sven Rieth; Peter Teriete; Susanne Kluba; Thorsten Biegner; Adelheid Munz; Siegmar Reinert Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2016-02-29 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Yeonjung Ha; Mohamed A Mohamed Ali; Molly M Petersen; William S Harmsen; Terry M Therneau; Han Chu Lee; Baek-Yeol Ryoo; Sally Bampoh; Kenneth A Valles; Mohamad Mady; Venkata R Missula; Kritika Prasai; Lewis R Roberts; Kang Mo Kim Journal: Hepatol Int Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 6.047