S Kumar1, A Kaczmarczyk1, B D Gerardot1. 1. Institute of Photonics and Quantum Sciences, SUPA, Heriot-Watt University , Edinburgh EH14 4AS, United Kingdom.
Abstract
Two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenide semiconductors are intriguing hosts for quantum light sources due to their unique optoelectronic properties. Here, we report that strain gradients, either unintentionally induced or generated by substrate patterning, result in spatially and spectrally isolated quantum emitters in mono- and bilayer WSe2. By correlating localized excitons with localized strain variations, we show that the quantum emitter emission energy can be red-tuned up to a remarkable ∼170 meV. We probe the fine-structure, magneto-optics, and second-order coherence of a strained emitter. These results raise the prospect of strain-engineering quantum emitter properties and deterministically creating arrays of quantum emitters in two-dimensional semiconductors.
Two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenide semiconductors are intriguing hosts for quantum light sources due to their unique optoelectronic properties. Here, we report that strain gradients, either unintentionally induced or generated by substrate patterning, result in spatially and spectrally isolated quantum emitters in mono- and bilayer WSe2. By correlating localized excitons with localized strain variations, we show that the quantum emitter emission energy can be red-tuned up to a remarkable ∼170 meV. We probe the fine-structure, magneto-optics, and second-order coherence of a strained emitter. These results raise the prospect of strain-engineering quantum emitter properties and deterministically creating arrays of quantum emitters in two-dimensional semiconductors.
Entities:
Keywords:
mono- and bilayer WSe2; patterned substrate; single quantum emitter; strain; transition metal dichalcogenide semiconductor
Single-photon sources are crucial
for a number of emerging quantum information processing and quantum
networking applications.[1] Of all the possible
quantum emitters, solid-state options are leading candidates for practical
applications.[2] Unlike trapped ions or atoms,
solid-state emitters are typically buried in a bulk, three-dimensional
material that provides long-term stability. Further, semiconductors
compatible with established optoelectronic processing technology enable
heterostructure devices and monolithic photonic structures for enhanced
functionality and performance.[3] However,
the bulk environment also provides obstacles and limitations for engineering
coherent and efficient quantum light sources. First, interaction with
phonons and fluctuating spins or charges within the emitter’s
environment can lead to dephasing.[4,5] Second, a high-dielectric
material presents intrinsic challenges to efficiently extract the
emitted photons into a single optical mode.[3]An intriguing alternative to host a quantum emitter is a two-dimensional
(2D) semiconductor. Like graphene, the first hexagonal Brillouin zone
(BZ) of monolayer (1L) transition metal dichalcogenide (TMD) accommodates
pairs of inequivalent valleys. Distinctively, the 1L TMDs offer energetic
gaps at the corners of the BZ (K-point) and strong
spin–orbit coupling further splits the valence bands by hundreds
of meV and the conduction bands by a few meV. This enables valley
dependent optical selection rules, which allows valley polarization,
valley coherence, and spin-valley coupling.[6] Further, strain up to ∼11% can be induced in these materials,[7] raising the prospect for significant tuning of
the electronic bandgap.[8−12] Crucially, the 2D nature eliminates the high-index environment that
hinders photon extraction and is fully compatible with integrated
photonics approaches.[13]Recently,
localized excitons (0D-X) in 2D WSe2 have
been shown to emit nonclassical light yet appear to maintain the general
electronic and magneto-optical characteristics (e.g., direct band
gap, large long-range exchange interaction energy, large Coulomb screening,
and large exciton g-factor) of the host 2D semiconductor.[14−18] The cause of exciton localization has been attributed to confinement
at defects within the electronic band gap of the WSe2.
The defects exhibit a broad-band (∼60 meV) emission feature[19] in 1L and bilayer (2L) WSe2 that
appears to be energetically modulated near the edges of flakes[16,18] or at wrinkles.[18] With aggressive spectral
filtering at these locations, the second-order coherence of individual
emitters has been probed to demonstrate their quantum nature.[14−18] However, a general approach to obtain and potentially engineer spatially
and spectrally isolated defects is essential for further development
of this promising quantum photonic platform. Here, we demonstrate
that local strain gradients in the 2D crystal offer this capability
and we take a first step toward deterministic engineering of the emitter
location and optical properties.Using an all-dry viscoelastic
stamping procedure,[20] we transfer a mechanically
exfoliated WSe2 flake (from bulk, nanoScience Instruments
product NS00182) onto a Si substrate prepatterned with etched holes
with a depth of 1 μm and a diameter of 4 μm. An optical
micrograph of the sample is shown in Figure a; the gray region and four white disks represent
the substrate and four etched holes, respectively, and the blue region
corresponds to the WSe2 flake. The two lightest contrast
regions of the flake are assigned as 1L and 2L regions. A portion
of the 1L flake is successfully placed onto a prepatterned hole. Also
observable in the contrast of the optical micrograph are a few wrinkles
and small bumps in the flake. Using a confocal microscope (see Methods), nonresonant microphotoluminescence (μ-PL)
spectra at an excitation power of 5 μW were obtained at the
1L and 2L positions of the corresponding labels in Figure a as shown by the black and
red curves in Figure b, respectively. As expected, the 1L (2L) region shows a strong (weak)
PL signal. The 1L spectrum shows two high energy peaks separated by
∼31 meV, corresponding to the quantum-well (2D) neutral exciton
(2D-X) and a 2D charged exciton, or trion (2D-X).[21] The broadband emission centered at 1.68 eV for both 1L and 2L WSe2 is due to defect-bound excitons.[19,21] Although the 1L band gap is direct, 2L WSe2 exhibits
an indirect bandgap between the conduction band minimum at Σ
and the valence band maximum at K in the first BZ.[12] The weak emission peak centered at 1.55 eV in
the 2L spectrum is due to this indirect 2D-X transition.
Figure 1
(a) Optical
micrograph of an exfoliated flake on top of a Si substrate with etched
holes (1 μm deep, 4 μm diameter). (b) Typical PL emission
spectra for 1L (black) and 2L (red) WSe2 from the smooth
and unstrained locations of the flake. The ensemble emission due to
defect-bound excitonic complexes can be seen in both 1L and 2L WSe2. (c–d) Color-coded spatial maps of PL with (c) integrated
intensities in the spectral range of 680–840 nm and (d) intensities
in the spectral range of 780–840 nm. (e) PL spectra corresponding
to localized bright spots numbered in (d). The excitation power was
5 μW. The open square in (a) marks the region of spatial maps
shown in (c) and (d). The two open circles in (c) mark the locations
of the etched holes.
(a) Optical
micrograph of an exfoliated flake on top of a Si substrate with etched
holes (1 μm deep, 4 μm diameter). (b) Typical PL emission
spectra for 1L (black) and 2L (red) WSe2 from the smooth
and unstrained locations of the flake. The ensemble emission due to
defect-bound excitonic complexes can be seen in both 1L and 2L WSe2. (c–d) Color-coded spatial maps of PL with (c) integrated
intensities in the spectral range of 680–840 nm and (d) intensities
in the spectral range of 780–840 nm. (e) PL spectra corresponding
to localized bright spots numbered in (d). The excitation power was
5 μW. The open square in (a) marks the region of spatial maps
shown in (c) and (d). The two open circles in (c) mark the locations
of the etched holes.To investigate the spatial dependence of the PL spectrum
on the flake, we scanned the entire region outlined by the yellow
box in Figure a. Figure c shows the spatial
map of the integrated intensities of the emission for 680 < λ
< 840 nm, where the 1L region of the flake has intense PL and the
remaining areas are dark. A one-to-one correspondence between Figure a and c can be seen.
The two circles in Figure c mark the regions of holes underneath the flake. Note that
the spatial map has been taken for a fixed focal plane, therefore
the regions of the flake over the etched hole are significantly less
bright due to alteration of the focal plane caused by buckling of
the flake. When we generate a spatial map for 780 < λ <
840 nm, as shown in Figure d, then the indirect 2D-X emission from the
2L region of the flake is distinctively seen. Crucially, we also observe
a few localized bright spots on the 1L flake around the edge of the
etched hole and a few more isolated bright spots in both the 1L and
2L regions of the flake. These spots are numbered from 1 to 6 for
1L and 7–9 for 2L, and their corresponding spectra are shown
in Figure e. The spectra
from these bright spots are strikingly different from the typical
emission spectra of 1L and 2L WSe2 (see Figure b). They show a comb-like emission
in the region of the defect-band and very sharp emission lines at
much lower energies. The comb-like emission has recently been reported,[14−18] but the observation of such isolated, highly detuned peaks is unique.
Tonndorf et al.[18] have observed sharp emission
lines on the shoulder of the ensemble defect band that are red-detuned
by ∼60 meV from the ensemble mean. Here, we show single quantum
emitters that are highly spectrally isolated, and in the extreme case
(see spectrum 2, 1L in Figure e at location 2 in Figure d), their emission lines are red-detuned by ∼170
meV.For further confirmation of the fact that the highly red-shifted
0D-X lines and the comb-like emission lines are only
observed in the strong strain-gradient regions, we show the evolution
of μ-PL spectra as the focus moves from the flat region of the
flake (with local strain of < ± 0.05%) to the strong strain-gradient
region of the flake (i.e., the region of the flake near the etched
hole). This is summarized in Figure , which shows μ-PL spectra along two orthogonal
lines passing through the reference point R on 1L WSe2 (see
inset). The black points on these lines in the inset marks the selected
locations where μ-PL spectra are chosen. Figure a shows the spectra along the long line which
is passing through a tiny 1L flake at the bottom right corner followed
by the 1L flat region and then the 1L region over the etched hole.
The spectra along the short line, which covers only the 1L flat region,
are shown in Figure b. First, the 0D-X band emission, which is fairly
continuous in the flat part of the flake (point R), becomes more discrete, developing a comb-like appearance. Second,
intense and sharp peaks emerge at energies both red- and blue-detuned
from the center of the defect band (e.g., D1 and A1 in Figure a, respectively) due to tensile
and compressive strain, respectively. On the other hand, almost no
change in the 0D-X band emission is observed along
the short line in Figure b, where the strain variation is minimal.
Figure 2
Inset: Segment of Figure c superimposed with
two orthogonal lines and with points A1 (A2), B1 (B2), ...I1 (I2)
on the long (short) line. The arrows are guides to the eye for ascending
order of these points and R refers to the intersection point of both
lines. (a–b) PL spectra correspond to the points on (a) long
and (b) short line marked in the inset.
Inset: Segment of Figure c superimposed with
two orthogonal lines and with points A1 (A2), B1 (B2), ...I1 (I2)
on the long (short) line. The arrows are guides to the eye for ascending
order of these points and R refers to the intersection point of both
lines. (a–b) PL spectra correspond to the points on (a) long
and (b) short line marked in the inset.To better understand the origin of the isolated highly red-shifted
emitters, we estimate the local strain in the 1L WSe2 by
analyzing the peak energy of the 2D-X emission at
an excitation power of 33 μW. The 2D-X peak
energy map for the 1L region of the flake is shown in Figure a. We choose a reference point
R on 1L WSe2 and estimate strain relative to this point.
We use a calibration of −55 meV shift in the 2D-X peak energy for 1% uniaxial tensile strain (see Figure S5(b) of
ref (12)). Note that
strain estimation for 2L region of the flake and 1L region that spans
the inner area of the patterned hole are not possible due to very
weak 2D-X emissions (see the spectrum at P6 in Figure d). A strain variation
of ∼ −0.05% (compressive) to 0.3% (tensile) across the
1L region of the flake is observed. The large portion of the 1L region
of the flake that looks flat optically (see Figure a) shows a small strain variation (< ±0.05%).
More importantly, a few highly localized energy minima are observed.
We label five of these positions as P1 to P5. The region with the
largest 2D-X red-shift, P5, is caused by a wrinkle
propagating from the 2L region as seen in the optical micrograph (Figure a). P1 corresponds
to a small bump which can be seen in the optical micrograph. Pockets
P2–P4 are caused by bending of the flake around the edge of
the etched hole. To characterize the spatial localization, we plot
in Figure c the change
in 2D-X peak energy (ΔE2D–X) for a horizontal line-cut through the center of
the five highly strained regions. Notably, pockets P1–P3 show
line widths (full width at half maximum, fwhm) approaching the diffraction
limit of the confocal microscope, suggesting that actual strain variations
are even more localized (<500 nm fwhm) than can be measured and
are averaged out by the finite microscope resolution. Nevertheless,
ΔE2D–X (estimated strain
variation) as large as ∼ −10 meV (∼0.2%) is observed
in the localized pockets.
Figure 3
(a) Color-coded spatial map of the 2D-X peak energy for 1L WSe2, which includes a few
localized energy minima. The energetic shift of the peak (ΔE2D–X) with respect to reference point
R was used to estimate the strain. (b–c) (b) PL spectra and
(c) horizontal cross-sectional ΔE2D–X/strain corresponding to reference point R and energy pockets P1
to P5 which correlates the effect of local strain gradients. (d) PL
spectra corresponding to reference point R, P3, and P6. The excitation
power for (a) and (d) were 33 μW and for (b) was 5 μW.
(a) Color-coded spatial map of the 2D-X peak energy for 1L WSe2, which includes a few
localized energy minima. The energetic shift of the peak (ΔE2D–X) with respect to reference point
R was used to estimate the strain. (b–c) (b) PL spectra and
(c) horizontal cross-sectional ΔE2D–X/strain corresponding to reference point R and energy pockets P1
to P5 which correlates the effect of local strain gradients. (d) PL
spectra corresponding to reference point R, P3, and P6. The excitation
power for (a) and (d) were 33 μW and for (b) was 5 μW.The μ-PL spectra corresponding
to the local minima P1 to P5 and R are shown in Figure b. The spectra at the locations show highly
red-shifted sharp emission lines together with the comb-like emission
of the ensemble band. In the extreme cases (see spectrum 2, 1L in Figure e at location 2 in Figure d), a red-tuning
of ∼170 meV is observed relative to the mean energy of the
ensemble defect band in unstrained regions. Further strain-gradient
correlations are found for all emitters in Figure d–e: four localized emitters occur
at the edge of the patterned hole, the remaining occur at locations
of unintentional strain. Conversely, the spectrum at R and elsewhere
on the flat 1L region (see Figure b) shows only a broad band 0D-X ensemble.
This direct correlation of localized strains and spatial and spectral
emitter isolation leads to a robust conclusion that local strain variations
disperse the energies of the individual defects in the 0D-X ensemble, resulting in comb-like emission within the nominal
defect band and much larger red-tuning of a few defects at highly
strained positions. Though we estimate a maximum strain of only ∼0.3%,
we expect that larger strains exist at more highly localized spatial
positions than we can measure because of the finite microscope resolution.
An alternative explanation for the spectrally and spatially isolated
emitters is localized contamination or chemical doping of the WSe2. To investigate the underlying cause of the structured broad
ensemble we show three μ-PL spectra taken at locations R, P3,
and P6 in Figure d.
We observe that the ratio of 2D-X to 2D-XT intensities is maintained at positions R and at P3,
the center of the broad defect ensemble moves linearly with the 2D-X and 2D-XT tuning, and the
line width of the broad defect ensemble increases with increasing
strain (see Figure S1 of Supporting Information for quantitative evidence). Note that the measurement of strain
at location P6 was not possible because of the almost vanishing signal
of 2D-X peak; however, a clear widening of the defect
ensemble band can be seen in Figure d. These three observations strongly support the correlation
of strain and emitter tuning rather than local substrate contamination
or chemical doping.The μ-PL emission spectrum at location
3 on 1L WSe2 flake (see Figure e) shows a sharp and spectrally isolated
emitter at λ = 782.72 nm. High-resolution spectroscopy reveals
a doublet split by Δ = 726 μeV with unequal intensities,
as shown in Figure a. Each component of the doublet shows saturation and an excitation
power (Pexc) dependent line width (see Figure b and c, respectively).
The solid line in Figure b is a saturation curve fit for a two-level system using the
relation I = Isat(Pexc/(Pexc + PN)), where PN =
2.78 μW is the normalization excitation power at which integrated
intensity of the emission peaks becomes half of the saturation integrated
intensity (Isat). It shows a linear power
dependence at low Pexc and a clear saturation
behavior at high Pexc. At the lowest Pexc, the minimum line widths measured are ∼60
μeV (fwhm). With increasing Pexc, increasing inhomogeneous broadening is observed. The inhomogeneous
broadening is likely caused by fluctuating charges in the environment
of the quantum emitter at a time scale faster than the experimental
acquisition time. Also, modest spectral wandering is observed at longer
time scales, as shown in the inset of Figure a. A naive expectation for a quantum emitter
exposed at the surface is severe nonradiative recombination, inhomogeneous
broadening, and photobleaching caused by nearby surface states. Surprisingly,
the 0D-X states in WSe2, perhaps aided
by the strong exciton binding energy, do not exhibit such deleterious
features. Further, we find the amount of inhomogeneous broadening
is directly linked to the nonresonant excitation power (Figure c), suggesting that quasi-resonant
or strictly resonant excitation could lead to minimal electric field
fluctuations and nearly transform limited line widths for 0D-X states.
Figure 4
(a) High resolution PL spectrum of 0D-X from location 3 of Figure d. The experimental data is fit by two Lorentzian curves (gray
line). The two peaks of the doublet are fine-structure-split 0D-X lines and the unequal peak intensities are due to anisotropic
local strain. Inset: Spectral fluctuations of the doublet revealed
using a color-coded time trace of the 0D-X lines.
The time bin is 10 s. (b–c) Excitation power dependences of
(b) integrated intensity and (c) line width of the low-energy 0D-X line. The gray line is the saturation curve fit. The red
data points in (b) and (c) mark the representative positions for the
spectrum shown in (a).
(a) High resolution PL spectrum of 0D-X from location 3 of Figure d. The experimental data is fit by two Lorentzian curves (gray
line). The two peaks of the doublet are fine-structure-split 0D-X lines and the unequal peak intensities are due to anisotropic
local strain. Inset: Spectral fluctuations of the doublet revealed
using a color-coded time trace of the 0D-X lines.
The time bin is 10 s. (b–c) Excitation power dependences of
(b) integrated intensity and (c) line width of the low-energy 0D-X line. The gray line is the saturation curve fit. The red
data points in (b) and (c) mark the representative positions for the
spectrum shown in (a).To investigate the nature of the doublet, we perform polarization-resolved
and magneto-optical spectroscopy. Figure a shows a polarization-resolved intensity
map of the doublet, revealing that the lines have unequal maximum
intensities, are linearly polarized, and the angle between their polarization
directions is 40°. We attribute the doublet to be the fine-structure
of a neutral 0D-X. The symmetry breaking of the confinement
potential leads to mixing of the two neutral excitonic states due
to the electron–hole spin-exchange interaction, and therefore,
the emission splits into two lines. The energetic separation between
these two lines is called the fine-structure splitting (Δ).[22,23] Here, we observe Δ = 726 μeV. Similar values of Δ
were reported recently[14−16] and the relatively large magnitude is likely due
to the large long-range exchange interaction energy. Usually, two
lines of the fine-structure split doublet have equal maximum intensities
and are linearly polarized along orthogonal directions. The unequal
intensities of the doublet lines and the nonorthogonality between
their polarization directions of the emitter at location 3 can be
ascribed to the presence of anisotropic strain.[24] We have also performed polarization dependent PL for other
emitters at locations with much less strain and find that the lines
of the doublets show nearly equal maximum intensities and their polarization
directions are nearly orthogonal to each other (see Figure 2S of Supporting Information).
Figure 5
(a) Color-coded PL intensity
as a function of polarization of the 0D-X lines at B = 2.5 T in Faraday geometry. The two dotted vertical lines
show polarization direction of low-energy (θl) and
high-energy (θh) 0D-X lines. A 40°
angle between these directions also reflects the presence of anisotropic
local strain. (b) Magnetic field dependence of the fine-structure
split doublet. (c) Normalized second-order correlation function g(2)(τ) of the 0D-X lines
under nonresonant cw excitation at P = 0.5PN. The fit (solid line) shows g(2)(0) = 0.17 and a lifetime of 4.14 ns.
(a) Color-coded PL intensity
as a function of polarization of the 0D-X lines at B = 2.5 T in Faraday geometry. The two dotted vertical lines
show polarization direction of low-energy (θl) and
high-energy (θh) 0D-X lines. A 40°
angle between these directions also reflects the presence of anisotropic
local strain. (b) Magnetic field dependence of the fine-structure
split doublet. (c) Normalized second-order correlation function g(2)(τ) of the 0D-X lines
under nonresonant cw excitation at P = 0.5PN. The fit (solid line) shows g(2)(0) = 0.17 and a lifetime of 4.14 ns.The fine-structure split doublet’s behavior
in an external magnetic field (B) is illustrated
in Figure b. In the
Faraday geometry (direction of magnetic field perpendicular to the
flake plane), Δ is modified according to , where μB is the Bohr magneton and g0D- is exciton g-factor. The
clean fit of the data to ΔB affirm that both lines
of the doublet originate from a single neutral 0D-X; the fit reveals g0D- = 7.16 ± 0.02. The large g0D- is not understood but is in agreement with recent
reports.[14−17] The large g0D- inspires further investigations into the spin-valley degree of freedom
in the TMD quantum emitters. Additionally, B also
changes the central emission energy (EAvg.) of the doublet due to the diamagnetic shift,[25] which is given by EAvg.(B) = EAvg.(0) + γ(B)2, where γ is the diamagnetic coefficient.
For this 0D-X, we measure γ = −3.9 ±
1.0 μeV/T2 (not shown). For a 3D confined system,
γ quantifies the combined contributions of confinement and Coulomb
interaction upon application of the magnetic field.[25] The very small γ observed here demonstrates very
strong confinement of 0D-X.Finally, we observe
strong antibunched photon emission from this red-shifted emitter. Figure c presents the second-order
correlation function g(2)(τ) under
nonresonant cw excitation (P = 0.5 P). The closed circles are measured data
and the solid line is the fit using the relation g(2)(τ) = 1 – ρ2e–|τ|/, where T1 is the lifetime and SBR =
ρ/(1 – ρ) is the signal-to-background ratio (SBR).
We obtain g(2)(τ) = 0.17 ±
0.02 from the fit, unambiguously proving quantum emission. The fit
yields T1 = 4.14 ± 0.15 ns and the
estimated SBR here is ∼10.In summary, we have achieved
resolution-limited spatial localization of 0D-X with
extremely low densities of ∼1 μm–2 within
a 50 nm emission bandwidth (760 < λ < 810 nm) and tuning
of the 0D-X emission energy over huge range (up to
≈170 meV). We directly correlate the 0D-X tuning
and spatial and spectral isolation to microscopic pockets of large
strain variation. These results demonstrate that strain engineering
is a viable approach to obtain spatially and spectrally isolated quantum
emitters in 2-D semiconductors. The passive exciton emission tuning
observed with the 2D quantum emitters is significantly larger than
the state-of-the-art for quantum emitters in bulk semiconductors.[24,26−28] However, there is significantly more potential for
strain engineering 0D-X states. First of all, massive
strain gradients are possible in 2D materials[7] and a number of approaches for both static or in situ tunable uniaxial
and biaxial strain engineering can be considered.[29] Second, the affect of strain on the electronic and optical
properties of 0D-X states beyond their emission energy
has yet to be investigated. For instance, in situ strain tuning can
enable engineering of the carrier confinement potential,[28] the permanent dipole moment, the fine-structure
splitting,[24,26,27] and the spin properties[30] of localized
exciton states. Notably, such quantum emitters could underpin a hybrid
semiconductor-atomic interface.[31,32] Finally, rather than
suspending the flake over a large hole, by placing the flake over
a nanostructured surface such as a periodic array of steps or holes,
one can envisage periodic arrays of strained quantum emitters.
Methods
Experimental
Setup
A confocal microscope with an objective lens with NA
of 0.82, yielding a diffraction limited focus of ∼460 nm at
λ = 750 nm, was used for μ-PL measurements with nonresonant
CW excitation at λ = 532 nm. The microscope used dichroic mirrors
at λ = 550 nm to separate the excitation and PL signals. The
sample was placed on automated nanopositioners at T = 4 K in a closed-cycle cryostat with B = 0 to
9 T superconducting magnet. All spectra were acquired with a 0.5 m
focal length spectrometer and nitrogen-cooled charge-coupled device
with a spectral resolution of ∼40 μeV at λ = 750
nm for an 1800 L/mm grating. Polarization dependent PL was analyzed
by combining a liquid-crystal variable retarder with a quarter wave
plate and fixed linear polarizer. A fiber-based Hanbury-Brown and
Twiss interferometer was used for second-order correlation measurements.
Coincidence events from two Si avalanche photodiodes were recorded
electronically on two synchronized input channels with a system timing
jitter of ∼600 ps. Efficient spectral filtering (resolution
∼3 meV) was achieved using two angle-sensitive edge filters.
Authors: F Ding; R Singh; J D Plumhof; T Zander; V Krápek; Y H Chen; M Benyoucef; V Zwiller; K Dörr; G Bester; A Rastelli; O G Schmidt Journal: Phys Rev Lett Date: 2010-02-12 Impact factor: 9.161
Authors: M Koperski; K Nogajewski; A Arora; V Cherkez; P Mallet; J-Y Veuillen; J Marcus; P Kossacki; M Potemski Journal: Nat Nanotechnol Date: 2015-05-04 Impact factor: 39.213
Authors: Hiram J Conley; Bin Wang; Jed I Ziegler; Richard F Haglund; Sokrates T Pantelides; Kirill I Bolotin Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2013-07-09 Impact factor: 11.189
Authors: Wenjing Yan; Andrey V Akimov; María Barra-Burillo; Manfred Bayer; Jonathan Bradford; Vitalyi E Gusev; Luis E Hueso; Anthony Kent; Serhii Kukhtaruk; Achim Nadzeyka; Amalia Patanè; Andrew W Rushforth; Alexey V Scherbakov; Dmytro D Yaremkevich; Tetiana L Linnik Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2022-08-12 Impact factor: 12.262
Authors: Bruno Schuler; Katherine A Cochrane; Christoph Kastl; Edward S Barnard; Edward Wong; Nicholas J Borys; Adam M Schwartzberg; D Frank Ogletree; F Javier García de Abajo; Alexander Weber-Bargioni Journal: Sci Adv Date: 2020-09-16 Impact factor: 14.136
Authors: Carlos Errando-Herranz; Eva Schöll; Raphaël Picard; Micaela Laini; Samuel Gyger; Ali W Elshaari; Art Branny; Ulrika Wennberg; Sebastien Barbat; Thibaut Renaud; Marc Sartison; Mauro Brotons-Gisbert; Cristian Bonato; Brian D Gerardot; Val Zwiller; Klaus D Jöns Journal: ACS Photonics Date: 2021-04-09 Impact factor: 7.529
Authors: Gabriele Grosso; Hyowon Moon; Benjamin Lienhard; Sajid Ali; Dmitri K Efetov; Marco M Furchi; Pablo Jarillo-Herrero; Michael J Ford; Igor Aharonovich; Dirk Englund Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2017-09-26 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Carmen Palacios-Berraquero; Dhiren M Kara; Alejandro R-P Montblanch; Matteo Barbone; Pawel Latawiec; Duhee Yoon; Anna K Ott; Marko Loncar; Andrea C Ferrari; Mete Atatüre Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2017-05-22 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Carmen Palacios-Berraquero; Matteo Barbone; Dhiren M Kara; Xiaolong Chen; Ilya Goykhman; Duhee Yoon; Anna K Ott; Jan Beitner; Kenji Watanabe; Takashi Taniguchi; Andrea C Ferrari; Mete Atatüre Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2016-09-26 Impact factor: 14.919