| Literature DB >> 26479241 |
Jane Johnson1, Teresa Collins2, Christopher Degeling3, Anne Fawcett4, Andrew D Fisher5, Rafael Freire6, Susan J Hazel7, Jennifer Hood8, Janice Lloyd9, Clive J C Phillips10, Kevin Stafford11, Vicky Tzioumis12, Paul D McGreevy13.
Abstract
The need for undergraduate teaching of Animal Welfare and Ethics (AWE) in Australian and New Zealand veterinary courses reflects increasing community concerns and expectations about AWE; global pressures regarding food security and sustainability; the demands of veterinary accreditation; and fears that, unless students encounter AWE as part of their formal education, as veterinarians they will be relatively unaware of the discipline of animal welfare science. To address this need we are developing online resources to ensure Australian and New Zealand veterinary graduates have the knowledge, and the research, communication and critical reasoning skills, to fulfill the AWE role demanded of them by contemporary society. To prioritize development of these resources we assembled leaders in the field of AWE education from the eight veterinary schools in Australia and New Zealand and used modified deliberative polling. This paper describes the role of the poll in developing the first shared online curriculum resource for veterinary undergraduate learning and teaching in AWE in Australia and New Zealand. The learning and teaching strategies that ranked highest in the exercise were: scenario-based learning; a quality of animal life assessment tool; the so-called 'Human Continuum' discussion platform; and a negotiated curriculum.Entities:
Keywords: animal ethics; animal welfare; learning and teaching; online curriculum resources; quality of life assessment; scenarios
Year: 2015 PMID: 26479241 PMCID: PMC4494409 DOI: 10.3390/ani5020362
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
Ranking curriculum features from 1–10; where 1 = most important and 10 = least important.
| Curriculum Feature | Ranking allocated by each respondent | Ranking Median | Ranking order | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resp. 1 | Resp. 2 | Resp. 3 | Resp. 4 | Resp. 5 | Resp. 6 | Resp. 7 | Resp. 8 | |||
| A negotiated curriculum | 2 | 10 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 10 | 3 | 4.5 | 3 |
| Scenarios and learning exercises | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Automated search engines for hot topics | 3 | 7 | 8 | 3 | 9 | 6 | 5 | 9 | 6.5 | 7 |
| A post-graduate suite | 9 | 9 | 10 | 10 | 7 | 4 | 9 | 10 | 9 | 10 |
| Animal welfare science essays | 10 | 8 | 9 | 6 | 10 | 9 | 6 | 8 | 8.5 | 9 |
| Dialogue Development tool ( | 5 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 4.5 | 3 |
| Quality of Life assessment tool | 1 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 2 |
| Delivering welfare advice tool | 8 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 5 |
| Team based learning (TBL) | 7 | 2 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 6.5 | 7 |
| Personal reflection tools | 6 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5.5 | 6 |