Literature DB >> 26478982

The effect of pharmacogenetic profiling with a clinical decision support tool on healthcare resource utilization and estimated costs in the elderly exposed to polypharmacy.

D Brixner1, E Biltaji1, A Bress2, S Unni2, X Ye2, T Mamiya3, K Ashcraft3, J Biskupiak1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and clinical decision-making for elderly patients based on cytochrome P450 (CYP) pharmacogenetic testing and the use of a comprehensive medication management clinical decision support tool (CDST), to a cohort of similar non-tested patients.
METHODS: An observational study compared a prospective cohort of patients ≥65 years subjected to pharmacogenetic testing to a propensity score (PS) matched historical cohort of untested patients in a claims database. Patients had a prescribed medication or dose change of at least one of 61 oral drugs or combinations of ≥3 drugs at enrollment. Four-month HRU outcomes examined included hospitalizations, emergency department (ED) and outpatient visits and provider acceptance of test recommendations. Costs were estimated using national data sources.
RESULTS: There were 205 tested patients PS matched to 820 untested patients. Hospitalization rate was 9.8% in the tested group vs. 16.1% in the untested group (RR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.39-0.95, p = 0.027), ED visit rate was 4.4% in the tested group vs. 15.4% in the untested group (RR = 0.29, 95% CI = 0.15-0.55, p = 0.0002) and outpatient visit rate was 71.7% in the tested group vs. 36.5% in the untested group (RR = 1.97, 95% CI = 1.74-2.23, p < 0.0001). The rate of overall HRU was 72.2% in the tested group vs. 49.0% in the untested group (RR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.32-1.64, p < 0.0001). Potential cost savings were estimated at $218 (mean) in the tested group. The provider majority (95%) considered the test helpful and 46% followed CDST provided recommendations.
CONCLUSION: Patients CYP DNA tested and treated according to the personalized prescribing system had a significant decrease in hospitalizations and emergency department visits, resulting in potential cost savings. Providers had a high satisfaction rate with the clinical utility of the system and followed recommendations when appropriate.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse drug events; CYP2C19; CYP2C9; CYP2D6; CYP3A4; CYP3A5; Cytochrome; Drug interactions; Drug metabolizing enzymes; Geriatrics; Health resource utilization; Pharmacogenetic testing; Polypharmacy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26478982     DOI: 10.3111/13696998.2015.1110160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Econ        ISSN: 1369-6998            Impact factor:   2.448


  39 in total

1.  A pilot study of the implementation of pharmacogenomic pharmacist initiated pre-emptive testing in primary care.

Authors:  Paul C D Bank; Jesse J Swen; Rowena D Schaap; Daniëlle B Klootwijk; Renée Baak-Pablo; Henk-Jan Guchelaar
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Introducing pharmacogenetic testing with clinical decision support into primary care: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Martin Dawes; Martin N Aloise; J Sidney Ang; Pieter Cullis; Diana Dawes; Robert Fraser; Gideon Liknaitzky; Andrea Paterson; Paul Stanley; Adriana Suarez-Gonzalez; Hagit Katzov-Eckert
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2016-09-21

Review 3.  Pharmacogenetic Decision Support Tools: A New Paradigm for Late-Life Depression?

Authors:  Ryan Abbott; Donald D Chang; Harris A Eyre; Chad A Bousman; David A Merrill; Helen Lavretsky
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 4.105

4.  Preemptive pharmacogenetic testing: exploring the knowledge and perspectives of US payers.

Authors:  Nicholas J Keeling; Meagen M Rosenthal; Donna West-Strum; Amit S Patel; Cyrine E Haidar; James M Hoffman
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 8.822

5.  Polypharmacy: a healthcare conundrum with a pharmacogenetic solution.

Authors:  Cierra N Sharp; Mark W Linder; Roland Valdes
Journal:  Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci       Date:  2019-11-02       Impact factor: 6.250

6.  CYP2D6 drug-gene and drug-drug-gene interactions among patients prescribed pharmacogenetically actionable opioids.

Authors:  Mitchell R Knisely; Janet S Carpenter; Claire Burke Draucker; Todd Skaar; Marion E Broome; Ann M Holmes; Diane Von Ah
Journal:  Appl Nurs Res       Date:  2017-10-07       Impact factor: 2.257

7.  Pharmacogenomics in cancer supportive care: key issues and future directions.

Authors:  Jai N Patel; Ian Olver; Fred Ashbury
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 8.  The impact of pharmacogenetic testing in patients exposed to polypharmacy: a scoping review.

Authors:  Erika L Meaddough; Sara M Sarasua; Tracy K Fasolino; Christopher L Farrell
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 3.550

9.  Effect of genetics clinical decision support tools on health-care providers' decision making: a mixed-methods systematic review.

Authors:  Agnes Sebastian; June C Carroll; Leslie E Oldfield; Chloe Mighton; Salma Shickh; Elizabeth Uleryk; Yvonne Bombard
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Economic Evaluations of Interventions to Optimize Medication Use in Older Adults with Polypharmacy and Multimorbidity: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Maude Laberge; Caroline Sirois; Carlotta Lunghi; Myriam Gaudreault; Yumiko Nakamura; Carolann Bolduc; Marie-Laure Laroche
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 4.458

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.