Literature DB >> 26478705

A new species of Mollitrichosiphum Suenaga from Taiwan Island (Hemiptera, Aphididae), based on morphological characteristics and DNA sequences.

Li-Yun Jiang1, Jing Chen1, Ge-Xia Qiao1.   

Abstract

A new species of Mollitrichosiphum Suenaga, Mollitrichosiphum tumorisiphum Qiao & Jiang, sp. n., from Fagus longipetiolata in Taiwan island is described. Siphunculi of Mollitrichosiphum tumorisiphum in alatae are distinctly swollen on the distal part, unlike those of the other known species in the genus. Updated keys to apterous and alate viviparous females of all known Chinese species of Mollitrichosiphum are provided. The specimens studied are deposited in the National Zoological Museum of China, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China and the Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA barcode; Greenideinae; Mollitrichosiphum tumorisiphum; NJ tree; morphology

Year:  2015        PMID: 26478705      PMCID: PMC4602290          DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.524.6075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zookeys        ISSN: 1313-2970            Impact factor:   1.546


Introduction

The oriental genus Suenaga (, ) is restricted mainly to south-east Asia, and is represented by 11 known species in China (Remaudière and Remaudière 1997, Zhang and Qiao 2010). It is distinguishable from other genera of by a series of transverse ridges on the hind tibia. At present, there are six species recorded in Taiwan Island (Tao 1990, 1999, Zhang and Qiao 2010). Amongst aphid samples in the recent survey of Taiwan, two samples of the genus were found that could not be identified to any known species. Based on morphological features and molecular data, one new species Qiao & Jiang, sp. n., feeding on , from mountainous areas in the northern and central part of Taiwan is described here. This new species differs from any other species in having alatae with siphunculi distinctly swollen on the distal part. Updated keys to the Chinese species of this genus are provided.

Materials and methods

Morphological description. Aphid terminology and the measurements in this paper generally follow Blackman and Eastop (2006) and Zhang and Qiao (2010). The unit of measurement in this paper is millimetres (mm). Metrical data are listed in Table 1. The holotype and one alate viviparous female of the paratypes (No. 26510) are illustrated in Figures 1–36.
Table 1.

Metrical data (mean, range and standard deviation) of Qiao & Jiang, sp. n. (in mm, abbreviations see Materials and Methods). Ant. I, II, III, IV, V, VIb, respectively; PT; Ant. III BD; URS; URS BW; 2HT; Hind tibia MW; SIPH; SIPH BW; SIPH DW; SIPH EW; Cauda BW; Setae on Tergite I; Setae on Tergite VIII.

, antennal segments I, II, III, IV, V and the base of antennal segment VI

, processus terminalis

, the basal diameter of antennal segment III

, ultimate rostral segment

, basal width of ultimate rostral segment

, second hind tarsal segment

, mid-width of hind tibia

, siphunculi

, basal width of siphunculi

, distal width of siphunculi

, width of expanded part on siphunculi

, basal width of cauda

: marginal setae on abdominal tergite I

: spinal setae on abdominal tergite VIII

PartsApterous viviparae (n=5)Alate viviparae (n=2)
MeanRangeStandard deviationMeanRange
Length (mm)Body length2.141.92–2.340.122.112.07–2.15
Body width0.980.92–1.040.040.790.77–0.81
Whole antennae1.591.53–1.670.051.761.76
Ant. I0.110.11–0.120.0020.110.11
Ant. II0.070.0700.070.07
Ant. III0.540.51–0.590.030.620.58–0.67
Ant. IV0.180.16–0.210.010.240.23–0.25
Ant. V0.210.17–0.230.010.260.26
Ant. VIb0.200.19–0.210.0050.210.21
PT0.270.26–0.290.010.300.30
URS0.210.18–0.220.010.210.21
Hind femur0.530.51–0.570.010.580.57–0.59
Hind tibia0.840.80–0.900.030.960.96
2HT0.130.125–0.1340.0040.130.13
SIPH0.770.73–0.860.031.161.12–1.2
SIPH BW0.070.07–0.090.0070.070.06–0.09
SIPH DW0.070.06–0.080.0050.050.048–0.053
SIPH EW0.160.13–0.190.020.100.09–0.12
Cauda0.050.05–0.070.0080.050.05
Cauda BW0.190.18–0.200.0060.180.17–0.18
Ant. III BD0.040.03–0.040.0020.030.03
Hind tibia MW0.050.04–0.050.0020.040.04
Cephalic setae0.180.16–0.190.010.160.15–0.16
Setae on Tergite I0.130.12–0.130.0070.060.06–0.07
Setae on Tergite VIII0.090.08–0.120.010.130.12–0.13
Setae on ANT. III0.180.17–0.190.0080.180.17–0.18
Setae on Hind tibia0.090.08–0.110.0060.090.09–0.10
Ratio (times)Whole antennae / Body0.70.71–0.720.20.90.9
Hind femur / Ant. III10.9–1.00.030.90.9–1.0
Hind tibia / Body0.80.75–0.830.030.90.89–0.93
PT / Ant. VIb1.41.3–1.50.061.41.4
URS / URS BW54–60.65.55.5
URS / 2HT1.61.4–1.80.11.71.7
Cauda / Cauda BW0.30.2–0.40.040.30.26–0.28
Cephalic setae / Ant. III BD4.94.3–5.70.54.74.6–4.9
Setae on Tergite I / Ant. III BD3.53.3–4.00.21.91.7–2.0
Setae on Tergite VIII / Ant. III BD2.62.3–3.40.43.73.4–4.0
Setae on ANT. III / ANT. III BD54.5–5.70.45.35.1–5.4
Setae on hind tibia / Hind tibia MW21.8–2.20.12.42.2–2.5
SIPH / Body0.40.3–0.40.020.60.5–0.6
SIPH / Ant. III1.41.3–1.50.061.91.8–2.0
SIPH / SIPH BW10.78.7–12.61.1216.713.9–19.5
SIPH / SIPH DW11.410. 7–13.00.823.121.3–25.0
SIPH / SIPH EW5.04.2–5.60.511.710.4–13.0
Figures 1–12.

Qiao & Jiang, sp. n. Apterous viviparous female: 1 dorsal view of head 2 antenna 3 ultimate rostral segment 4 mesosternal furca 5 hind tibia 6 dorsal seta on abdominal tergite I 7 spinules on venter of abdominal segment V 8 siphunculus 9 cauda 10 anal plate 11 genital plate. Alate viviparous female: 12. antennal segment III. Scale bars = 0.10 mm.

Figures 27–37.

Qiao & Jiang, sp. n. Alate viviparous female: 27 dorsal view of body 28 dorsal view of head 29 antennal segments I–IV 30 antennal segments V–VI 31 ultimate rostral segment 32 hind tibia, tarsi and claws 33 spinules on venter of abdominal segment V 34 siphunculus 35 cauda and anal plate 36 genital plate. Second instar larva: 37. dorsal view of body. Scale bars = 0.10 mm.

Qiao & Jiang, sp. n. Apterous viviparous female: 1 dorsal view of head 2 antenna 3 ultimate rostral segment 4 mesosternal furca 5 hind tibia 6 dorsal seta on abdominal tergite I 7 spinules on venter of abdominal segment V 8 siphunculus 9 cauda 10 anal plate 11 genital plate. Alate viviparous female: 12. antennal segment III. Scale bars = 0.10 mm. Qiao & Jiang, sp. n. Apterous viviparous female: 13 dorsal view of body 14 dorsal view of head 15 compound eyes 16 antennal segments I–IV 17 antennal segments V–VI 18 ultimate rostral segment 19 mesosternal furca 20 hind tibia, tarsi and claws 21 dorsal seta on abdominal tergite I 22 spinules on venter of abdominal segment V 23 siphunculus 24 cauda; 25 anal plate 26 genital plate. Scale bars = 0.10 mm. Qiao & Jiang, sp. n. Alate viviparous female: 27 dorsal view of body 28 dorsal view of head 29 antennal segments I–IV 30 antennal segments V–VI 31 ultimate rostral segment 32 hind tibia, tarsi and claws 33 spinules on venter of abdominal segment V 34 siphunculus 35 cauda and anal plate 36 genital plate. Second instar larva: 37. dorsal view of body. Scale bars = 0.10 mm. Metrical data (mean, range and standard deviation) of Qiao & Jiang, sp. n. (in mm, abbreviations see Materials and Methods). Ant. I, II, III, IV, V, VIb, respectively; PT; Ant. III BD; URS; URS BW; 2HT; Hind tibia MW; SIPH; SIPH BW; SIPH DW; SIPH EW; Cauda BW; Setae on Tergite I; Setae on Tergite VIII. , antennal segments I, II, III, IV, V and the base of antennal segment VI , processus terminalis , the basal diameter of antennal segment III , ultimate rostral segment , basal width of ultimate rostral segment , second hind tarsal segment , mid-width of hind tibia , siphunculi , basal width of siphunculi , distal width of siphunculi , width of expanded part on siphunculi , basal width of cauda : marginal setae on abdominal tergite I : spinal setae on abdominal tergite VIII Molecular analyses. Fifty-seven samples belonging to eight species were included. The standard molecular barcode, mitochondrial , and a faster-evolving gene, , were used. All sequences were taken from Liu et al. (2013), Zhang et al. (2011) and Zhang et al. (2012). Voucher information and GenBank accession numbers for all samples are listed in Table 2. Multiple alignments were conducted with ClustalX 2.0.12 (Larkin et al. 2007) and then verified manually. trees and genetic distances were estimated for both COI and Cytb sequences with MEGA 6.06 (Tamura et al. 2013), using model (Kimura 1980). Bootstrap analyses were performed with 1000 replications.
Table 2.

Voucher information and GenBank accession numbers for aphid samples used in the molecular study.

SpeciesVoucher numberHost plantCollection localityCOICytb
Mollitrichosiphum luchuanum (Takahashi)14414Amygdalus persicaFujian: Mt. WuyiJQ926108 PaJF969358 Pb
Mollitrichosiphum luchuanum (Takahashi)14488Amygdalus persicaFujian: Mt. WuyiJQ926107 PaJF969361 Pb
Mollitrichosiphum luchuanum (Takahashi)18104Meliosma rigidaFujian: Mt. WuyiJQ926105 PaJF969368 Pb
Mollitrichosiphum luchuanum (Takahashi)21910UnknownGuangdong: ShixingJQ926106 PaJF969389 Pb
Mollitrichosiphum montanum (van der Goot)16504UnknownTibet: ZhangmuJQ926104 PaJF969367 Pb
Mollitrichosiphum montanum (van der Goot)18324UnknownTibet: ZayuJQ926103 PaJF969393 Pb
Mollitrichosiphum montanum (van der Goot)23754Alnus nepalensisYunnan: JingdongJQ926102 PaJF969387 Pb
Mollitrichosiphum nandii Basu14712Alnus cremastogyneYunnan: BaoshanJQ926101 PaJF969364 Pb
Mollitrichosiphum nandii Basu15370UnknownTibet: MedogJQ926100 PaJF969365 Pb
Mollitrichosiphum nandii Basu18382Fagus longipetiolataTibet: TangmaiJQ926099 PaJF969369 Pb
Mollitrichosiphum nandii Basu23101UnknownSichuan: Mt. LuojiJQ926148 PaJF969394 Pb
Mollitrichosiphum nigrofasciatum (Maki)14560Lithocarpus glaberFujian: Mt. WuyiJQ926098 PaJF969363 Pb
Mollitrichosiphum nigrofasciatum (Maki)14805Cyclobalanopsis glaucaFujian: Mt. WuyiJQ926097 PaJF969395 Pb
Mollitrichosiphum nigrofasciatum (Maki)17329Quercus sp.Zhejiang: TaishunJQ926096 PaJN645006 Pc
Mollitrichosiphum nigrofasciatum (Maki)17331FagaceaeZhejiang: TaishunJQ926095 PaNA
Mollitrichosiphum nigrofasciatum (Maki)17333FagaceaeZhejiang: TaishunJQ926094 PaNA
Mollitrichosiphum nigrofasciatum (Maki)17387Quercus alienaZhejiang: TaishunJQ926093 PaNA
Mollitrichosiphum nigrofasciatum (Maki)18499Castanopsis sp.Hainan: Mt. DiaoluoJQ926092 PaNA
Mollitrichosiphum nigrofasciatum (Maki)18510Lithocarpus elmerrilliiHainan: Mt. DiaoluoJQ926090 PaJN645010 Pc
Mollitrichosiphum nigrofasciatum (Maki)21773UnknownHunan: Mt. BamianJQ926089 PaNA
Mollitrichosiphum nigrofasciatum (Maki)21859UnknownGuangdong: RuyuanJQ926088 PaNA
Mollitrichosiphum nigrofasciatum (Maki)21916ElaeocarpaceaeGuangdong: ShixingJQ926087 PaNA
Mollitrichosiphum nigrofasciatum (Maki)21966UnknownGuangdong: ShixingJQ926086 PaJF969399 Pb
Mollitrichosiphum nigrofasciatum (Maki)22101Lithocarpus glaberFujian: LongyanJQ926085 PaJF969400 Pb
Mollitrichosiphum nigrum Zhang & Qiao14405Castanea sp.Fujian: Mt. WuyiJQ926083 PaJN645004 Pc
Mollitrichosiphum nigrum Zhang & Qiao14417Elaeagnus pungensFujian: Mt. WuyiJQ926084 PaJF969359 Pb
Mollitrichosiphum nigrum Zhang & Qiao18913Meliosma cuneifoliaGuangxi: LongshengJQ926082 PaJF969375 Pb
Mollitrichosiphum nigrum Zhang & Qiao19258Ailanthus altissimaGuangxi: Xing’anJQ926081 PaJF969377 Pb
Mollitrichosiphum nigrum Zhang & Qiao21845UnknownHunan: Mt. MangJQ926080 PaJF969390 Pb
Mollitrichosiphum nigrum Zhang & Qiao21856UnknownGuangdong: RuyuanJQ926079 PaJF969391 Pb
Mollitrichosiphum nigrum Zhang & Qiao21872UnknownGuangdong: RuyuanJQ926078 PaJN645011 Pc
Mollitrichosiphum rhusae Ghosh18508Helicia hainanensisHainan: Mt. DiaoluoJQ926077 PaJF969371 Pb
Mollitrichosiphum rhusae Ghosh18511Helicia hainanensisHainan: Mt. DiaoluoJQ926076 PaJF969372 Pb
Mollitrichosiphum rhusae Ghosh18513FagaceaeHainan: Mt. DiaoluoJQ926075 PaJF969373 Pb
Mollitrichosiphum rhusae Ghosh18514Helicia hainanensisHainan: Mt. DiaoluoJQ926074 PaJF969374 Pb
Mollitrichosiphum rhusae Ghosh20811FagaceaeHainan: Mt. WuzhiJQ926073 PaJF969380 Pb
Mollitrichosiphum rhusae Ghosh20858MeliaceaeHainan: Mt. DiaoluoJQ926072 PaJF969381 Pb
Mollitrichosiphum tenuicorpus (Okajima)14421Castanea sp.Fujian: Mt. WuyiJQ926070 PaJF969360 Pb
Mollitrichosiphum tenuicorpus (Okajima)14537Castanopsis sclerophyllaFujian: Mt. WuyiJQ926069 PaJF969362 Pb
Mollitrichosiphum tenuicorpus (Okajima)18506Cyclobalanopsis neglectaHainan: Mt. DiaoluoJQ926067 PaJF969370 Pb
Mollitrichosiphum tenuicorpus (Okajima)18614Castanopsis carlesiiGuangdong: ShixingJQ926066 PaJF969396 Pb
Mollitrichosiphum tenuicorpus (Okajima)18892FagaceaeGuangxi: LongshengJQ926065 PaJF969397 Pb
Mollitrichosiphum tenuicorpus (Okajima)19242FagaceaeHainan: Mt. BawangJQ926064 PaJF969376 Pb
Mollitrichosiphum tenuicorpus (Okajima)19521Quercus sp.Hainan: Mt. JianfengJQ926063 PaJF969378 Pb
Mollitrichosiphum tenuicorpus (Okajima)20530Castanopsis feroxYunnan: SimaoJQ926062 PaJF969379 Pb
Mollitrichosiphum tenuicorpus (Okajima)20866FagaceaeHainan: Mt. JianfengJQ926061 PaJF969382 Pb
Mollitrichosiphum tenuicorpus (Okajima)20938Castanopsis fabriHainan: Mt. JianfengJQ926060 PaJF969383 Pb
Mollitrichosiphum tenuicorpus (Okajima)22152UnknownFujian: ZhangzhouJQ926059 PaJF969384 Pb
Mollitrichosiphum tenuicorpus (Okajima)22155UnknownFujian: ZhangzhouJQ926058 PaJF969385 Pb
Mollitrichosiphum tenuicorpus (Okajima)22161UnknownFujian: ZhangzhouJQ926057 PaJN645013 Pc
Mollitrichosiphum tenuicorpus (Okajima)22166UnknownFujian: ZhangzhouJQ926056 PaJF969386 Pb
Mollitrichosiphum tenuicorpus (Okajima)23843Castanopsis hystrixYunnan: CangyuanJQ926055 PaJX186736 Pa
Mollitrichosiphum tenuicorpus (Okajima)26029Castanopsis eyreiGuangxi: LinguiJN644999 PcJN645015 Pc
Mollitrichosiphum tenuicorpus (Okajima)26261Castanopsis sp.Guangxi: Mt. ShiwandashanJN645000 PcJN645016 Pc
Mollitrichosiphum tenuicorpus (Okajima)26270Castanopsis sp.Guangxi: Mt. ShiwandashanJQ418313 PcJQ418317 Pc
Mollitrichosiphum tumorisiphum Qiao & Jiang, sp. n.26510Fagus longipetiolataTaiwan: Mt. TamanJN645002 PcJQ418315 Pc
Mollitrichosiphum tumorisiphum Qiao & Jiang, sp. n.26515Fagus longipetiolataTaiwan: HualianJN645003 PcJQ418316 Pc

Reference sequences form previous studies: PaP Liu et al. (2013), PbP Zhang et al. (2011), PcP Zhang et al. (2012).

cytochrome c oxidase subunit I cytochrome b Neighbor-joining Kimura’s two-parameter Specimen depositories. The holotype, some paratypes of the new species and the other specimens examined are deposited in the National Zoological Museum of China, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. Two paratypes (including to one apterous and one alate viviparous females) of the new species are deposited in the , London, the United Kingdom. Natural History Museum Voucher information and GenBank accession numbers for aphid samples used in the molecular study. Reference sequences form previous studies: PaP Liu et al. (2013), PbP Zhang et al. (2011), PcP Zhang et al. (2012).

Taxonomy

Qiao & Jiang sp. n. http://zoobank.org/D85E577E-D2FA-40CA-84AD-112101E86024

Descriptions.

Apterous viviparous female: Body elongated oval (Fig. 13), yellow green in life, with pairs of emerald green dorsal markings and pale brown siphunculi (Figs 38–41).
Figures 13–26.

Qiao & Jiang, sp. n. Apterous viviparous female: 13 dorsal view of body 14 dorsal view of head 15 compound eyes 16 antennal segments I–IV 17 antennal segments V–VI 18 ultimate rostral segment 19 mesosternal furca 20 hind tibia, tarsi and claws 21 dorsal seta on abdominal tergite I 22 spinules on venter of abdominal segment V 23 siphunculus 24 cauda; 25 anal plate 26 genital plate. Scale bars = 0.10 mm.

Figures 38–41.

Qiao & Jiang, sp. n. 38 colony on the bud of the host 39 colony on the underside of the leaf 40 apterous viviparous female and larvae 41 apterous, alate viviparous females and larvae.

Qiao & Jiang, sp. n. 38 colony on the bud of the host 39 colony on the underside of the leaf 40 apterous viviparous female and larvae 41 apterous, alate viviparous females and larvae. Mounted specimens. Body pale brown, with head and prothorax fused. Dorsal setae thick, long and pointed (Figs 6, 21). Head. Ocular tubercles dark brown, well developed. Dorsum of head with three pairs of setae between antennae, and 4–6 setae between eyes. Maximum lengths of cephalic setae 4.3–5.7 times as long as basal diameter of antennal segment III. Front flat, antennal tubercles slightly developed (Figs 1, 14). Antennae 6-segmented (Figs 2, 16–17), 0.71-0.72 times as long as body length. Processus terminalis 1.3–1.5 times as long as base of the segment. Antennal segments I–IV, basal half of segment V and of base of segment VI pale brown, other parts of segment V and VI brown. Antennal segments III–VI with short imbrications. Antennal setae pointed. Antennal segment I with only short setae; segments II–V with long and short setae, setae on the inner side of the segment distinctly longer, thicker and more numerous than setae on the outer side of the segment; segments I–VI each with 4–6, 4 or 5, 16–23, 3 or 4, 3 or 4, (3 or 4)+(4–6) setae, respectively; apex of processus terminalis with 3 or 4 short blunt setae; maximum length of setae on segment III 4.5–5.7 times as long as basal diameter of the segment. Rostrum reaching hind coxae, sometimes abdominal segment I; ultimate rostral segment pale brown, except for brown apex, long and wedge-shaped (Figs 3, 18), 4–6 times as long as its basal width, 1.4–1.8 times as long as second hind tarsal segment; segment IV and V obviously separated; with 3 pairs of primary and 3 pairs of secondary setae. Thorax. Mesosternal furca with a short stem (Figs 4, 19). Pronotum with 1 pair of anterior spinal, 3 or 4 posterior spinal, 1 pair of anterior marginal and 2 pairs of posterior marginal setae Legs slender. Femora and tibiae pale brown. Hind femur 0.9–1 times as long as antennal segment III. Hind tibia 0.75–0.83 times as long as body, with PageBreak57–62 transverse ridges on basal 3/4 of the segment (Figs 5, 20). Setae on legs short, pointed or acuminate. Maximum length of setae on hind tibia 1.8–2.2 times as long as mid-width of the segment. Tarsi brown, with transverse imbrications. Chaetotaxy of first tarsomeres: 7, 7, 7. Abdomen. Abdominal tergite I with 4–6 spinal and pleural setae, and 2 pairs of marginal setae, tergite VIII with one pair of spinal setae. Maximum lengths of marginal setae on abdominal tergite I and dorsal setae on tergite VIII 3.3–4.0 and 2.3–3.4 times as long as basal diameter of antennal segment III, respectively. Venter of abdominal segments II–VI with coarse spinules on pleural and sub-marginal area (Figs 7, 22). Spiracles oval and open, on pale brown spiracular plates. Siphunculi brown, long and PageBreakPageBreakPageBreakPageBreakPageBreaktubular, strongly swollen over most of length and constricted near apex (Figs 8, 23), flange distinct; 0.3–0.4 times as long as body, 1.3–1.5 times as long as antennal segment III, 8.7–12.6 times as long as its basal width, 4.2–5.6 times as long as width of expanded part, 10.7–13 times as long as its distal width. Siphunculi with spinules evenly distributed and with spinulose imbrications at apex. Each siphunculus with 95–118 setae, long and pointed. Cauda, anal plate and genital plate pale brown. Cauda broadly rounded (Figs 9, 24), with spinules and round apex; 0.2–0.4 times as long as its basal width; with 8–10 setae. Anal plate transversely elliptical (Figs 10, 25), with spinules and with a transverse band of cell-like markings on spinal area, with 16 or 17 setae. Genital plate transverse oval (Figs 11, 26), with spinules, 4–6 anterior and 4–8 posterior setae. Gonapophyses three, spinal one with 6 setae and each pleural one with 3 setae. Alate viviparous female: Body elongate oval (Fig. 27), yellow green in life, with green dorsal markings (Figs 39, 41), dark brown forewing veins and dark brown siphunculi (Fig. 41). Mounted specimens. Dorsal setae thick, long and pointed. Head. Head, antennae and ultimate rostral segment dark brown. Dorsum of head with 6 setae between antennae, and 4–6 setae between eyes. Maximum lengths of cephalic setae 4.6–4.9 times as long as basal diameter of antennal segment III. Front flat (Fig. 28). Antennae 6-segmented (Figs 12, 29–30), 0.9 times as long as body length. Processus terminalis 1.4 times as long as base of the segment. Antennal segments III–VI with short imbrications. Antennal setae thick, long and pointed; segments I–VI each with 4, 4 or 5, 18, 4 or 5, 4, 4+5 setae, respectively; apex of processus terminalis with 4 short blunt setae; length of setae on segment III 5.1–5.4 times as long as basal diameter of the segment. Antennal segment III with 7–9 nearly round secondary rhinaria, distributed on basal 2/3 of the segment. Rostrum reaching abdominal segment I; ultimate rostral segment long wedge-shaped (Fig. 31), 5.5 times as long as its basal width, 1.7 times as long as second hind tarsal segment; segment IV and V obviously separated; with 3 pairs of primary and 2-3 pairs of secondary setae. Thorax. Thorax, femora, tibiae and tasi dark brown. Pronotum with 6 spinal and pleural setae and 3 pairs of marginal setae. Legs slender. Inside of distal half of femora with short spare spinulose imbrications. Hind femur 0.9–1 times as long as antennal segment III. Hind tibia 2 times as long as body, with 69–72 transverse ridges on basal 3/4 of the segment (Fig. 33). Setae on legs short and pointed. Maximum length of setae on hind tibia 2.5–2.9 times as long as mid-width of the segment. Second tarsal segments with transverse imbrications. Chaetotaxy of first tarsomeres: 7, 7, 7. Fore wings with media twice branched and distal 1/3 of CuR1 Rcurved to media; hind wings with 2 oblique veins. Abdomen. Abdominal tergites I–VI with spinal, pleural and marginal sclerotic markings fused into a large brown patch; tergites VII and VIII each with one brown transverse patch. Abdominal tergite I with 8–10 setae, tergite VII with 4 setae, tergite VIII with 2 setae. Maximum lengths of marginal setae on abdominal tergite I and dorsal setae on tergite VIII 1.7–2.0 and 3.4–4.0 times as long as basal diameter of antennal segment III, respectively. Venter of abdominal segments III–VI with coarse PageBreakspinules on pleural and sub-marginal area. Spiracles oval and open, on brown oval spiracular plates. Siphunculi long. tubular, distinctly swollen on distal half (Fig. 34), flange distinct, basal 2/3 of siphunculi dark brown and distal 1/3 brown, with spinules evenly distributed and with spinulose imbrications at apex; 0.5–0.6 times as long as body, 1.8–2 times as long as antennal segment III, 13.9–19.5 times as long as its basal width, 10.4–13 times as long as width of expanded part, 21.3–25 times as long as its distal width; each with 105–120 long and pointed setae. Cauda, anal plate and genital plate brown. Cauda broadly rounded (Fig. 35); 0.26–0.28 times as long as its basal width; with spare spinulose imbrications and 12 setae. Anal plate transversely elliptical, with spare spinulose imbrications and 52–58 setae (Fig. 35). Genital plate transverse oval (Fig. 36), with spinules and 84–104 setae. Gonapophyses three, spinal one with 8 setae and each pleural one with 4 setae.

Specimens examined.

Holotype: apterous viviparous female, CHINA, Taiwan Island: Tamanshan Mountain, Fuxing Town, Taoyuan County, 24.70°N, 121.43°E, altitude 1630m, 14 June 2011, No. 26510–1–1–1, on , coll. X.L. Huang. Paratypes: 3 apterous viviparous females, 1 alate viviparous females and 1 second instar larva, 1 apterous viviparous female and 1 alate viviparous female (BMNH), with the same collection data as holotype; 1 apterous viviparous female, Bilu, Xiulin Town, Hualian County, 24.00°N, 121.21°E, altitude 2150m, 20 July 2011, No. 26515, on , coll. X.L. Huang.

Etymology.

The name of this species is derived from its most distinctive feature, its markedly swollen siphunculi. The specific name is composed of “tumor (Latin, =inflated, swelling)” and “siphum (Latin, =tube)”.

Diagnosis.

The new species is distinctly different from the other known species in the genus, based on siphunculi of alatae distinctly expanded on the apical half. It is similar to the species (Takahashi), but differs from the latter as follows: body with long and stout dorsal setae, pointed at apex (the latter: at least with some bifurcate dorsal setae); each siphunculus with more than 95 setae (the latter: less than 80); hind tibia with 20–63 short transverse ridges (the latter: with more than 84). It is also similar to the species Suenaga, but differs from the latter as follows in apterous viviparae: dorsal of abdomen pale brown, without sclerotic pattern (the latter: with fused dark brown sclerotic patterns); hind tibia with 57–62 transverse ridges (the latter: with 31–33); ultimate rostral segment 0.18–0.22 mm long, 4–6 times as long as basal width, 1.4–1.8 times as long as hind second tarsal segment (the latter: 0.28–0.41 mm, 6.1–8.4 times, 2.4–2.8 times); ultimate rostral segment with 3 pairs of secondary setae (the latter: with 7 pairs).

Biology.

Colonizing the underside of young leaves of new growth of . (Figs 38–41).

Molecular analyses

The alignment sequences of COI and Cytb genes included 658 and 666 sites, of which 133 and 129 were parsimony-informative, respectively. The results of NJ analyses of COI and Cytb sequences are summarized. The NJ trees presented here are unrooted and do not reflect phylogenetic relationships, but are used to represent the genetic distance matrices (Foottit et al. 2008). The COI tree (Fig. 42) contained 57 samples of species and showed eight well-supported clades. All morphologically identified species, including Qiao & Jiang, sp. n., formed monophyletic clusters, indicating that they are genetically distinct from one another. The Cytb tree (Fig. 43) containing 50 samples yielded a similar result, with Qiao & Jiang, sp. n. again retrieved in a distinct clade.
Figure 42.

Neighbour-joining tree for samples based on COI sequences. Numbers above branches indicate bootstrap values (>50%).

Figure 43.

Neighbour-joining tree for samples based on Cytb sequences. Numbers above branches indicate bootstrap values (>50%).

Neighbour-joining tree for samples based on COI sequences. Numbers above branches indicate bootstrap values (>50%). Neighbour-joining tree for samples based on Cytb sequences. Numbers above branches indicate bootstrap values (>50%). For the sampled known species of , the mean intraspecific variation was 0.2% (range: 0–0.9%) in COI and 0.1% (range: 0–1.1%) in Cytb. The genetic distance between two distinct samples of Qiao & Jiang, sp. n. was 0 in COI and 0.9% in Cytb. Interspecific genetic divergence between the known species averaged 8.7% (range: 0.3–12.5%) in COI and 8.1% (range: 0.2–12.3%) in Cytb. Pairwise sequence divergences of COI and Cytb among the species are presented in Table 3. The mean genetic distance between Qiao & Jiang, sp. n. and the other species was 10.3% (range: 8.9–11.9%) in COI and 8.8% (range: 7.6%–11.0%) in Cytb, corresponding well to the interspecific divergence between the other known species.
Table 3.

Kimura’s two-parameter genetic distances (mean ± standard deviation) among species based on COI (lower half of matrix) and Cytb (upper half of matrix) sequences. The genetic distances between Qiao & Jiang, sp. n. and the other species are shown in bold.

Species12345678
1. Mollitrichosiphum luchuanum0.075±0.0010.060±0.0020.104±0.0020.036±0.0010.002±00.076±0.0010.082±0.001
2. Mollitrichosiphum montanum0.074±0.0010.050±0.0030.094±0.0020.081±0.0030.077±0.0010.104±0.0010.089±0.001
3. Mollitrichosiphum nandii0.066±0.0010.045±0.0030.097±0.0020.068±0.0010.058±0.0020.077±0.0010.078±0.002
4. Mollitrichosiphum nigrofasciatum0.102±0.0010.089±0.0020.095±0.0020.114±0.0020.102±0.0020.117±0.0020.106±0.002
5. Mollitrichosiphum nigrum0.030±0.0010.074±0.0010.065±0.0010.103±0.0020.035±0.0010.082±0.0010.094±0.001
6. Mollitrichosiphum rhusae0.003±00.074±0.0010.063±0.0010.100±0.0010.030±0.0010.075±0.0010.080±0.001
7. Mollitrichosiphum tenuicorpus0.077±00.088±0.0010.082±0.0020.121±0.0030.084±0.0010.074±00.085±0.002
8. Mollitrichosiphum tumorisiphum Qiao & Jiang, sp. n.0.096±00.090±0.0010.094±0.0010.117±0.0020.095±0.0010.096±00.105±0
Kimura’s two-parameter genetic distances (mean ± standard deviation) among species based on COI (lower half of matrix) and Cytb (upper half of matrix) sequences. The genetic distances between Qiao & Jiang, sp. n. and the other species are shown in bold. The results of NJ analyses and genetic distances based on COI and Cytb sequences strongly confirmed that the new morphologically determined species Qiao & Jiang, sp. n. was genetically different from the known species sampled in this study.

Updated key to species of from China

(Apterous viviparous females) (Alate viviparous females) (Remark: and are not included in the key to alatae, because no specimens are available).
1Antennal setae with similar length on inner and outer sides of the segment; hind tibia with 17–22 transverse ridgesMollitrichosiphum (Mollitrichosiphum) tenuicorpus (Okajima)
Antennal setae long or short, long setae being mainly on the inner side of the segment; hind tibia with 20–84 transverse ridges2 Mollitrichosiphum (Metatrichosiphon) spp.
2Hind tibia with more than 84 short transverse ridgesMollitrichosiphum (Metatrichosiphum) niitakaensis (Takahashi)
Hind tibia with 20–63 short transverse ridges3
3Abdominal tergite VII with 13 or 14 setae; body with pointed and dense dorsal setaeMollitrichosiphum (Metatrichosiphum) nandii Basu
Abdominal tergite VII with only 2–4 setae4
4Siphunculi long, 0.7–0.9 times as long as bodyMollitrichosiphum (Metatrichosiphum) montanum (van der Goot)
Siphunculi at most 0.7 times as long as body5
5Body with long and stout dorsal setae, pointed at apex6
Body at least with some bifurcate dorsal setae7
6Dorsal of abdomen with fused dark brown sclerotic patterns; hind tibia with 31–33 transeverse ridges; ultimate rostral segment 0.3–0.4 mm long, 6.1–8.4 times as long as basal width, 2.4–2.8 times as long as hind second tarsal segment, with 7 pairs of secondary setaeMollitrichosiphum (Metatrichosiphum) yamabiwae Suenaga
Dorsal of abdomen pale brown, without sclerotic pattern; hind tibia with 57–62 transeverse ridges; ultimate rostral segment 0.18–0.22 mm long, 4–6 times as long as basal width, 1.36–1.77 times as long as hind second tarsal segment, with 3 pairs of secondary setaeMollitrichosiphum (Metatrichosiphum) tumorisiphum Qiao & Jiang, sp. n.
7Length of ultimate rostral segment less than 2 times that of hind second tarsal segment length8
Length of ultimate rostral segment more than 2 times that of hind second tarsal segment length9
8Body 2.9 mm long; hind tibia with 37–43 transverse ridgesMollitrichosiphum (Metatrichosiphum) glaucae Takahashi
Body 1.4–2.2 mm long; hind tibia with 27–38 transverse ridgesMollitrichosiphum (Metatrichosiphum) nigrofasciatum (Maki)
9Hind tibia with less than 30 transverse ridges10
Hind tibia with more than 30 transverse ridges11
10Body setae mostly pointed; ultimate rostral segment 2.3–2.4 times as long as hind second tarsal segment; on plants of FagaceaeMollitrichosiphum (Metatrichosiphum) luchuanum (Takahashi)
Body setae mostly bifurcate; ultimate rostral segment 1.8Mollitrichosiphum (Metatrichosiphum) taiwanum (Takahashi)
11Body pale in mounted specimens, except for brown siphunculi; processus terminalis 1.6–1.8 times as long as the base of antennal segment VI; hind tibia with 35–46 transverse ridgestMollitrichosiphum (Metatrichosiphum) rhusae Ghosh
Body brown in mounted specimens; processus terminalis 1.3–1.6 times as long as the base of antennal segment VI; hind tibia with 53–63 transverse ridgesMollitrichosiphum (Metatrichosiphum) nigrum Zhang & Qiao
1Antennal setae on flagellum with similar length on inner and outer sides of the segmentMollitrichosiphum (Mollitrichosiphum) tenuicorpus (Okajima)
Antennal setae on flagellum long or short, long setae mainly on the inner side of the segment2 Mollitrichosiphum (Metatrichosiphon) spp.
2Abdominal tergite VII with 9–12 setaeMollitrichosiphum (Metatrichosiphum) nandii Basu
Abdominal tergite VII with 2–6 setae3
3Antennal segment III with 5–10 secondary rhinaria4
Antennal segment III with more than 14 secondary rhinaria5
4Hind tibia with 25–43 transverse ridges; ultimate rostral segment 3.9–4.5 times as long as its basal width; each siphunculus with 65–96 setaeMollitrichosiphum (Metatrichosiphum) nigrofasciatum (Maki)
Hind tibia with 69–72 transverse ridges; ultimate rostral segment 5.5 times as long as its basal width; each siphunculus with 105–120 setaeMollitrichosiphum (Metatrichosiphum) tumorisiphum Qiao & Jiang, sp. n.
5Hind tibia with more than 42 transverse ridges6
Hind tibia with less than 38 transverse ridges8
6Ultimate rostral segment 1.8–1.9 times as long as hind second tarsal segmentMollitrichosiphum (Metatrichosiphum) montanum (van der Goot)
Ultimate rostral segment more than 2.4 times of hind second tarsal segment length7
7Hind tibia with 49–53 transverse ridges; antennal segment III with 14–16 secondary rhinariaMollitrichosiphum (Metatrichosiphum) nigrum Zhang & Qiao
Hind tibia with about 43 transverse ridges; antennal segment III with 20 secondary rhinariaMollitrichosiphum (Metatrichosiphum) rhusae Ghosh
8Hind tibia with about 30 transverse ridges; antennal segment III with 20 or 21 secondary rhinaria; siphunculi 0.8 times as long as body lengthMollitrichosiphum (Metatrichosiphum) taiwanum (Takahashi)
Hind tibia with about 34 transverse ridges; antennal segment III with less than 20 secondary rhinaria; siphunculi at most 0.8 times as long as body length9
9Ultimate rostral segmentIV about 5.2 times as long as segment V; siphunculi about 2.4 mm long, about 17.3 times as long as its basal widthMollitrichosiphum (Metatrichosiphum) luchuanum (Takahashi)
Ultimate rostral segment IV 6.4–-7.0 times as long as segment V; siphunculi 1.7–1.8 mm long, 14.6–17.0 times as long as its basal widthMollitrichosiphum (Metatrichosiphum) yamabiwae Suenaga
  5 in total

1.  MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0.

Authors:  Koichiro Tamura; Glen Stecher; Daniel Peterson; Alan Filipski; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0.

Authors:  M A Larkin; G Blackshields; N P Brown; R Chenna; P A McGettigan; H McWilliam; F Valentin; I M Wallace; A Wilm; R Lopez; J D Thompson; T J Gibson; D G Higgins
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-09-10       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Species identification of aphids (Insecta: Hemiptera: Aphididae) through DNA barcodes.

Authors:  R G Foottit; H E L Maw; C D VON Dohlen; P D N Hebert
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 7.090

4.  A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences.

Authors:  M Kimura
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Species differentiation of Chinese mollitrichosiphum (Aphididae: greenideinae) driven by geographical isolation and host plant acquirement.

Authors:  Ruiling Zhang; Xiaolei Huang; Liyun Jiang; Fumin Lei; Gexia Qiao
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 6.208

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.