Literature DB >> 26477679

Processing of Facial Emotion in Bipolar Depression and Euthymia.

Lucy J Robinson1, John M Gray2, Mike Burt3, I Nicol Ferrier2, Peter Gallagher2.   

Abstract

Previous studies of facial emotion processing in bipolar disorder (BD) have reported conflicting findings. In independently conducted studies, we investigate facial emotion labeling in euthymic and depressed BD patients using tasks with static and dynamically morphed images of different emotions displayed at different intensities. Study 1 included 38 euthymic BD patients and 28 controls. Participants completed two tasks: labeling of static images of basic facial emotions (anger, disgust, fear, happy, sad) shown at different expression intensities; the Eyes Test (Baron-Cohen, Wheelwright, Hill, Raste, & Plumb, 2001), which involves recognition of complex emotions using only the eye region of the face. Study 2 included 53 depressed BD patients and 47 controls. Participants completed two tasks: labeling of "dynamic" facial expressions of the same five basic emotions; the Emotional Hexagon test (Young, Perret, Calder, Sprengelmeyer, & Ekman, 2002). There were no significant group differences on any measures of emotion perception/labeling, compared to controls. A significant group by intensity interaction was observed in both emotion labeling tasks (euthymia and depression), although this effect did not survive the addition of measures of executive function/psychomotor speed as covariates. Only 2.6-15.8% of euthymic patients and 7.8-13.7% of depressed patients scored below the 10th percentile of the controls for total emotion recognition accuracy. There was no evidence of specific deficits in facial emotion labeling in euthymic or depressed BD patients. Methodological variations-including mood state, sample size, and the cognitive demands of the tasks-may contribute significantly to the variability in findings between studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Affective disorder; Emotional hexagon; Eyes test; Facial emotion labeling; Facial expression recognition; Mood

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26477679     DOI: 10.1017/S1355617715000909

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc        ISSN: 1355-6177            Impact factor:   2.892


  5 in total

1.  Neurocognitive performance as an endophenotype for mood disorder subgroups.

Authors:  Alison K Merikangas; Lihong Cui; Monica E Calkins; Tyler M Moore; Ruben C Gur; Raquel E Gur; Kathleen R Merikangas
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 4.839

2.  Emotion Processing Deficit in Euthymic Bipolar Disorder: A Potential Endophenotype.

Authors:  Preethi V Reddy; Saravanakumar Anandan; Gopalkumar Rakesh; Venkatarama Shivakumar; Boban Joseph; Sunil Kalmady Vasu; Sri Mahavir Agarwal; Kesavan Muralidharan; Ganesan Venkatasubramanian; Janardhanan C Narayanaswamy
Journal:  Indian J Psychol Med       Date:  2021-08-19

3.  Comparison of Ecological Micro-Expression Recognition in Patients with Depression and Healthy Individuals.

Authors:  Chuanlin Zhu; Xinyun Chen; Jianxin Zhang; Zhiying Liu; Zhen Tang; Yuting Xu; Didi Zhang; Dianzhi Liu
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 3.558

4.  Ecological micro-expression recognition characteristics of young adults with subthreshold depression.

Authors:  Chuanlin Zhu; Ming Yin; Xinyun Chen; Jianxin Zhang; Dianzhi Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Interrogating an ICD-coded electronic health records database to characterize the epidemiology of prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Winrich A Freiwald; Jonathan N Tobin; Christina Pressl; Caroline S Jiang; Joel Correa da Rosa; Maximilian Friedrich; Roger Vaughan
Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2020-06-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.