| Literature DB >> 26477018 |
Abstract
In this paper, I explain the demands of filial obligations from act and rule consequentialism. More specifically, I defend a rule-consequentialist explanation of filial obligations, and identify a few factors in relation to the determination of filial demands; they include the costs of internalization of filial obligations, and the proportions of the young and the old generations in a population pyramid. I believe that in a society with an aging population, we may accept a strong view of filial obligation. Towards the end of the paper, I explain that rule-consequentialism is compatible with certain special views of filial obligations, such as the gratitude theory and the special goods theory; these theories represent ways in which adult children and their parents may obtain special goods from engaging in the relationship.Entities:
Keywords: Consequentialism; Demandingness; Filial obligation; Long-term caregiving; Population; Special goods theory
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26477018 DOI: 10.1007/s11019-015-9668-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Health Care Philos ISSN: 1386-7423