Literature DB >> 26476893

Thoracic and lumbar posture behaviour in sitting tasks and standing: Progressing the biomechanics from observations to measurements.

Andrew P Claus1, Julie A Hides2, G Lorimer Moseley3, Paul W Hodges4.   

Abstract

Few studies quantify spinal posture behaviour at both the thoracolumbar and lumbar spinal regions. This study compared spontaneous spinal posture in 50 asymptomatic participants (21 males) during three conditions: 10-min computer task in sitting (participants naïve to the measure), during their perceived 'correct' sitting posture, and standing. Three-dimensional optical tracking quantified surface spinal angles at the thoracolumbar and lumbar regions, and spinal orientation with respect to the vertical. Despite popular belief that lordotic lumbar angles are 'correct' for sitting, this was rarely adopted for 10-min sitting. In 10-min sitting, spinal angles flexed 24(7-9)deg at lumbar and 12(6-8)deg at thoracolumbar regions relative to standing (P < 0.001). When participants 'corrected' their sitting posture, their thoracolumbar angle -2(7)deg was similar to the angle in standing -1(6)deg (P = 1.00). Males were flexed at the lumbar angle relative to females for 10-min sitting, 'correct' sitting and standing, but showed no difference at the thoracolumbar region.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd and The Ergonomics Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Posture; Sitting; Spine

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26476893     DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Ergon        ISSN: 0003-6870            Impact factor:   3.661


  8 in total

1.  Lower spinal postural variability during laptop-work in subjects with cervicogenic headache compared to healthy controls.

Authors:  Sarah Mingels; Wim Dankaerts; Ludo van Etten; Liesbeth Bruckers; Marita Granitzer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 2.  Use of Integrative Medicine in the United States Military Health System.

Authors:  Cathaleen Madsen; Megan Vaughan; Tracey Pérez Koehlmoos
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 2.629

3.  Relationships between Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire and Online Rapid Office Strain Assessment Questionnaire.

Authors:  Ardalan Shariat; Joshua A Cleland; Mahmoud Danaee; Mehdi Kargarfard; Vahide Moradi; Shamsul Bahri Mohd Tamrin
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.429

Review 4.  Exercise interventions to improve postural malalignments in head, neck, and trunk among adolescents, adults, and older people: systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Mohammad Bayattork; Margrethe Bordado Sköld; Emil Sundstrup; Lars Louis Andersen
Journal:  J Exerc Rehabil       Date:  2020-02-26

5.  The effectiveness of a comprehensive corrective exercises program and subsequent detraining on alignment, muscle activation, and movement pattern in men with upper crossed syndrome: protocol for a parallel-group randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mohammad Bayattork; Foad Seidi; Hooman Minoonejad; Lars Louis Andersen; Phil Page
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Electronic Skin Wearable Sensors for Detecting Lumbar-Pelvic Movements.

Authors:  Yuxin Zhang; Pari Delir Haghighi; Frada Burstein; Lim Wei Yap; Wenlong Cheng; Lina Yao; Flavia Cicuttini
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Effect of Using an 8-Figure Shoulder Brace on Posture and Muscle Activities during the Performance of Dental Hygiene Procedures.

Authors:  Tae-Lim Yoon; Ji-Hyun Min; Han-Na Kim
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Comprehensive corrective exercise program improves alignment, muscle activation and movement pattern of men with upper crossed syndrome: randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Foad Seidi; Mohammad Bayattork; Hooman Minoonejad; Lars Louis Andersen; Phil Page
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.