Literature DB >> 26476823

Shoulder dystocia and associated manoeuvres as risk factors for perineal trauma.

Nivedita Gauthaman1, Samuel Walters2, In-Ae Tribe3, Louise Goldsmith4, Stergios K Doumouchtsis5,2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Shoulder dystocia (SD) is an obstetric emergency that can be associated with serious neonatal morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to identify the incidence and risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) in women who sustained SD at birth.
METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study over a 5-year period whereby 403 cases of SD were identified. The primary outcome measure was to identify the incidence of OASIS in women with SD. We also evaluated the role of the manoeuvres used for the management of SD and aimed to identify possible correlations between specific manoeuvres and OASIS by univariate and multivariate regression analysis.
RESULTS: Shoulder dystocia was associated with a three-fold increase in the risk of OASIS in our population. The use of internal manoeuvres (OR 2.182: 95 % CI 1.173-4.059), an increased number of manoeuvres ≥ 4 (OR 4.667: 95 % CI 1.846-11.795), Woods' screw manoeuvre (OR 3.096: 95 % CI 1.554-6.169), reverse Woods' screw manoeuvre (OR 4.848: 95 % CI 1.647-14.277) and removal of the posterior arm (OR 2.222: 95 % CI 1.117-4.421) were all associated with a significant increase in the likelihood of OASIS.
CONCLUSIONS: In our study, instrumental deliveries, the use of internal manoeuvres (Woods' screw and reverse Woods' screw) and four or more manoeuvres for the management of SD were independently associated with a higher incidence of OASIS. To effectively manage shoulder dystocia with lower risks of perineal trauma, these factors could be considered when designing further prospective studies and developing management protocols.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Childbirth; Instrumental delivery; OASIS; Shoulder dystocia manoeuvres; Third/fourth degree tear

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26476823     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-015-2863-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  14 in total

1.  Obstetric anal sphincter lacerations.

Authors:  V L Handa; B H Danielsen; W M Gilbert
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Racial/ethnic differences in perineal, vaginal and cervical lacerations.

Authors:  Linda M Hopkins; Aaron B Caughey; David V Glidden; Russell K Laros
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations: defining high-risk clinical clusters.

Authors:  Emily F Hamilton; Samuel Smith; Lin Yang; Philip Warrick; Antonio Ciampi
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Epidural analgesia and third- or fourth-degree lacerations in nulliparas.

Authors:  J N Robinson; E R Norwitz; A P Cohen; T F McElrath; E S Lieberman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  An Australian prospective cohort study of risk factors for severe perineal trauma during childbirth.

Authors:  Hannah G Dahlen; Maureen Ryan; Caroline S E Homer; Margaret Cooke
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2006-11-27       Impact factor: 2.372

6.  Racial differences in severe perineal lacerations after vaginal delivery.

Authors:  Jay Goldberg; Terry Hyslop; Jorge E Tolosa; Carmen Sultana
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Risk factors for perineal injury during delivery.

Authors:  L M Christianson; V E Bovbjerg; E C McDavitt; K L Hullfish
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Perineal body length and lacerations at delivery.

Authors:  Shad H Deering; Nicole Carlson; Michael Stitely; Alexander D Allaire; Andrew J Satin
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 0.142

Review 9.  Obstetric anal sphincter injury: incidence, risk factors, and management.

Authors:  Thomas C Dudding; Carolynne J Vaizey; Michael A Kamm
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Management of shoulder dystocia: trends in incidence and maternal and neonatal morbidity.

Authors:  I Z MacKenzie; Mutayyab Shah; Katie Lean; Susan Dutton; Helen Newdick; Danny E Tucker
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  3 in total

1.  Impact of fetal manipulation on maternal and neonatal severe morbidity during shoulder dystocia management.

Authors:  Bineta Diack; Fabrice Pierre; Bertrand Gachon
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 2.493

2.  Accuracy of Fetal Biacromial Diameter and Derived Ultrasonographic Parameters to Predict Shoulder Dystocia: A Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Marco La Verde; Pasquale De Franciscis; Clelia Torre; Angela Celardo; Giulia Grassini; Rossella Papa; Stefano Cianci; Carlo Capristo; Maddalena Morlando; Gaetano Riemma
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury increases with maternal age irrespective of parity: a population-based register study.

Authors:  Ulla Waldenström; Cecilia Ekéus
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 3.007

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.