PURPOSE: Mobility of the seminal vesicles relative to the prostate challenges adequate dose coverage. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of tumour invasion on SV mobility. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Three groups of 30 prostate cancer patients with (1) no invasion on MR, (2) minimal invasion (<5mm), and (3) extensive invasion (>5mm) were studied. Translations and rotations of the SV were measured with CBCT and compared between the three groups. RESULTS: In the extensive group the random SV translations were significantly lower in comparison with the no invasion group in the LR: 0.15 vs 0.16 cm (p=0.015), CC: 0.17 vs 0.23 cm (p=0.004) and AP direction: 0.19 vs 0.26 cm (p=0.002). Also the random SV rotation on the LR axis was significantly lower: 5.2 vs 6.3° (p=0.035). In comparison with the minimal invasion group the random SV translations were significantly lower in the extensive group in the CC: 0.17 vs 0.24 cm (p=0.001) and AP direction 0.19 vs 0.31 cm (p=0.007) and for the rotation on the LR axis: 5.2 vs 6.5° (p=0.043). CONCLUSION: Increasing tumour invasion in the SV reduces the mobility of the SV, however the mobility remains considerable.
PURPOSE: Mobility of the seminal vesicles relative to the prostate challenges adequate dose coverage. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of tumour invasion on SV mobility. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Three groups of 30 prostate cancerpatients with (1) no invasion on MR, (2) minimal invasion (<5mm), and (3) extensive invasion (>5mm) were studied. Translations and rotations of the SV were measured with CBCT and compared between the three groups. RESULTS: In the extensive group the random SV translations were significantly lower in comparison with the no invasion group in the LR: 0.15 vs 0.16 cm (p=0.015), CC: 0.17 vs 0.23 cm (p=0.004) and AP direction: 0.19 vs 0.26 cm (p=0.002). Also the random SV rotation on the LR axis was significantly lower: 5.2 vs 6.3° (p=0.035). In comparison with the minimal invasion group the random SV translations were significantly lower in the extensive group in the CC: 0.17 vs 0.24 cm (p=0.001) and AP direction 0.19 vs 0.31 cm (p=0.007) and for the rotation on the LR axis: 5.2 vs 6.5° (p=0.043). CONCLUSION: Increasing tumour invasion in the SV reduces the mobility of the SV, however the mobility remains considerable.
Authors: Shyama U Tetar; Anna M E Bruynzeel; Lisa Verweij; Omar Bohoudi; Berend J Slotman; Tezontl Rosario; Miguel A Palacios; Frank J Lagerwaard Journal: Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Date: 2022-07-03
Authors: Per Munck Af Rosenschold; Michael J Zelefsky; Aditya P Apte; Andrew Jackson; Jung Hun Oh; Elliot Shulman; Neil Desai; Margie Hunt; Pirus Ghadjar; Ellen Yorke; Joseph O Deasy Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2018-04-12 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Flora Goupy; Stéphane Supiot; David Pasquier; Igor Latorzeff; Ulrike Schick; Erik Monpetit; Geoffrey Martinage; Chloé Hervé; Bernadette Le Proust; Joel Castelli; Renaud de Crevoisier Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-01-25 Impact factor: 3.240