Literature DB >> 26476471

Shorter Hospital Stay and Lower 30-Day Readmission After Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty Compared to Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Justin Drager1, Adam Hart1, Jad Abou Khalil2, David J Zukor1, Stephane G Bergeron1, John Antoniou1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reducing hospital stay and unplanned hospital readmission of arthroplasty patients has been a topic of recent interest. The aim of the present study was to query the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database to compare the length of hospital stay (LOS) and the subsequent 30-day hospital readmission rates in patients undergoing primary unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
METHODS: We identified 1340 UKAs and 36,274 TKAs over a 2-year period (2011-2012). Patient demographics, comorbidities, LOS, 30-day postoperative complications, and readmission rates were compared between the groups. Multivariate regression analysis was used to determine the effect of procedure type on LOS and readmission rates.
RESULTS: Unicondylar knee arthroplasty patients had a median LOS of 2 days compared to 3 days for TKAs (P < .001). The readmission rate in the TKA group was nearly double that of the UKA group (4.1% vs 2.2%) (P < .0001). Multivariate regression analysis identified that undergoing a UKA was predictive for a shorter LOS (coefficient -1 day) and was protective for 30-day readmission (odds ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.88).
CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing UKA had a shorter LOS and a lower 30-day readmission rate compared to TKA patients. After adjusting for selected cofounders, we demonstrated that undergoing a UKA is a protective factor for 30-day readmission.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  30-day readmission; ACS; NSQIP; length of stay; total knee arthroplasty; unicondylar knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26476471     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.09.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  13 in total

Review 1.  [Recommendations for unicondylar knee replacement in the course of time : A current inventory].

Authors:  J Beckmann; M T Hirschmann; G Matziolis; J Holz; R V Eisenhart-Rothe; C Becher
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  [Focal femoral resurfacing and unicompartmental knee replacement : Between osteotomy and total knee replacement].

Authors:  Philipp Henle; Matthias J Feucht; Christian Stärke
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Total versus partial knee replacement in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: the TOPKAT RCT.

Authors:  David J Beard; Loretta J Davies; Jonathan A Cook; Graeme MacLennan; Andrew Price; Seamus Kent; Jemma Hudson; Andrew Carr; Jose Leal; Helen Campbell; Ray Fitzpatrick; Nigel Arden; David Murray; Marion K Campbell
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.014

4.  Continuous quality improvement in orthopedic surgery: changes and implications with health system funding reform.

Authors:  Paul E Beaulé; Darren M Roffey; Stéphane Poitras
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  [Amélioration continue de la qualité en chirurgie orthopédique: modifications et répercussions de la réforme du financement du système de santé].

Authors:  Paul E Beaulé; Darren M Roffey; Stéphane Poitras
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 6.  Unicompartmental knee replacement - Current perspectives.

Authors:  Stefano Campi; Saket Tibrewal; Rory Cuthbert; Sheo B Tibrewal
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-11-28

7.  Clinical results and short-term survivorship of robotic-arm-assisted medial and lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Francesco Zambianchi; Giorgio Franceschi; Elisa Rivi; Federico Banchelli; Andrea Marcovigi; Claudio Khabbazè; Fabio Catani
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Postoperative fixed flexion deformity greater than 10° lead to poorer functional outcome 10 years after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jared Ze Yang Yeh; Jerry Yongqiang Chen; Joel Wei-An Lim; Hee Nee Pang; Darren Keng Jin Tay; Shi-Lu Chia; Ngai Nung Lo; Seng Jin Yeo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Patient relevant outcomes of unicompartmental versus total knee replacement: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hannah A Wilson; Rob Middleton; Simon G F Abram; Stephanie Smith; Abtin Alvand; William F Jackson; Nicholas Bottomley; Sally Hopewell; Andrew J Price
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2019-02-21

10.  Radiological outcomes following manual and robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Gregory S Kazarian; Robert L Barrack; Toby N Barrack; Charles M Lawrie; Ryan M Nunley
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2021-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.