Literature DB >> 26476441

Dose-Response Functions for the Olfactory, Nasal Trigeminal, and Ocular Trigeminal Detectability of Airborne Chemicals by Humans.

J Enrique Cometto-Muñiz1, Michael H Abraham2.   

Abstract

We gathered from the literature 47 odor and 37 trigeminal (nasal and ocular) chemesthetic psychometric (i.e., detectability or dose-response) functions from a group of 41 chemicals. Vapors delivered were quantified by analytical methods. All functions were very well fitted by the sigmoid (logistic) equation: y = 1 / (1 + e({-(x-C)/D})), where parameter C quantifies the detection threshold concentration and parameter D the steepness of the function. Odor and chemesthetic functions showed no concentration overlap: olfactory functions grew along the parts per billion (ppb by volume) range or lower, whereas trigeminal functions grew along the part per million (ppm by volume) range. Although, on average, odor detectability rose from chance detection to perfect detection within 2 orders of magnitude in concentration, chemesthetic detectability did it within one. For 16 compounds having at least 1 odor and 1 chemesthetic function, the average gap between the 2 functions was 4.6 orders of magnitude in concentration. A quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) using 5 chemical descriptors that had previously described stand-alone odor and chemesthetic threshold values, also holds promise to describe, and eventually predict, olfactory and chemesthetic detectability functions, albeit functions from additional compounds are needed to strengthen the QSAR.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chemesthetic detectability functions,; chemosensory detection; nasal and ocular irritation thresholds; odor detectability functions; odor thresholds; quantitative structure–activity relationships (QSAR); volatile organic compounds

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26476441     DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjv060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  5 in total

1.  Recognition of the Component Odors in Mixtures.

Authors:  Marion E Frank; Dane B Fletcher; Thomas P Hettinger
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  Somatosensory Response to Trigeminal Stimulation: A Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) Study.

Authors:  Christine I Hucke; Marlene Pacharra; Jörg Reinders; Christoph van Thriel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Itch Beyond the Skin-Mucosal Itch.

Authors:  Olivia J Ly Lesslar; Peter K Smith
Journal:  Front Allergy       Date:  2021-10-28

4.  Evaluation of the Perceptual Interactions among Aldehydes in a Cheddar Cheese Matrix According to Odor Threshold and Aroma Intensity.

Authors:  Chen Chen; Wenya Zhou; Haiyan Yu; Jiajie Yuan; Huaixiang Tian
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-09-19       Impact factor: 4.411

5.  Titrating the Smell of Fear: Initial Evidence for Dose-Invariant Behavioral, Physiological, and Neural Responses.

Authors:  Jasper H B de Groot; Peter A Kirk; Jay A Gottfried
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-03-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.