Literature DB >> 26476397

Eating like there's no tomorrow: Public awareness of the environmental impact of food and reluctance to eat less meat as part of a sustainable diet.

Jennie I Macdiarmid1, Flora Douglas2, Jonina Campbell2.   

Abstract

Reducing meat consumption is central to many of the scientific debates on healthy, sustainable diets because of the high environmental impact of meat production. Missing from these debates are the public perspectives about eating less meat and consideration of cultural and social values associated with meat. The aim of this study was to explore public awareness of the environmental impact of food and their willingness to reduce meat consumption. Twelve focus groups and four individual interviews were conducted with adults from a range of socio-economic groups living in both rural and urban settings in Scotland. Public understanding of the link between food, environment and climate change was explored, with a focus on meat and attitudes towards reducing meat consumption. Data were transcribed and analysed thematically. Three dominant themes emerged: a lack of awareness of the association between meat consumption and climate change, perceptions of personal meat consumption playing a minimal role in the global context of climate change, and resistance to the idea of reducing personal meat consumption. People associated eating meat with pleasure, and described social, personal and cultural values around eating meat. Some people felt they did not need to eat less meat because they had already reduced their consumption or that they only ate small quantities. Scepticism of scientific evidence linking meat and climate change was common. Changing non-food related behaviours was viewed as more acceptable and a greater priority for climate change mitigation. The study highlights the role meat plays in the diet for many people, beyond nutritional needs. If healthy, sustainable dietary habits are to be achieved, cultural, social and personal values around eating meat must be integrated into the development of future dietary recommendations.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attitudes; Climate change; Culture; Focus groups; Meat; Sustainable diets

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26476397     DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.10.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  46 in total

1.  The potential effects of meat substitution on diet quality could be high if meat substitutes are optimized for nutritional composition-a modeling study in French adults (INCA3).

Authors:  Marion Salomé; François Mariotti; Marie-Charlotte Nicaud; Alison Dussiot; Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot; Marie-Noëlle Maillard; Jean-François Huneau; Hélène Fouillet
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 5.614

Review 2.  Plant-based meat analogs: A review with reference to formulation and gastrointestinal fate.

Authors:  Anum Ishaq; Shafeeqa Irfan; Arooba Sameen; Nauman Khalid
Journal:  Curr Res Food Sci       Date:  2022-06-07

3.  Where we work determines what we eat: A qualitative exploration of the multi-dimensional influences on meat consumption when home and office working during the Covid 19 lockdown in London, UK.

Authors:  Sophie Pluck; Angus Morrison-Saunders
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2022-06-26       Impact factor: 5.016

4.  The Acceptability of Food Policies.

Authors:  Romain Espinosa; Anis Nassar
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 5.  Sustainable Diets for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and Management.

Authors:  Andrea S Mendoza-Vasconez; Matthew J Landry; Anthony Crimarco; Claire Bladier; Christopher D Gardner
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 5.967

6.  Achieving dietary recommendations and reducing greenhouse gas emissions: modelling diets to minimise the change from current intakes.

Authors:  Graham W Horgan; Amandine Perrin; Stephen Whybrow; Jennie I Macdiarmid
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 6.457

7.  Overconsumption of Energy and Excessive Discretionary Food Intake Inflates Dietary Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Australia.

Authors:  Gilly A Hendrie; Danielle Baird; Brad Ridoutt; Michalis Hadjikakou; Manny Noakes
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 8.  Indicators and Recommendations for Assessing Sustainable Healthy Diets.

Authors:  Maite M Aldaya; Francisco C Ibañez; Paula Domínguez-Lacueva; María Teresa Murillo-Arbizu; Mar Rubio-Varas; Beatriz Soret; María José Beriain
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-05-02

9.  Nudging healthy and sustainable food choices: three randomized controlled field experiments using a vegetarian lunch-default as a normative signal.

Authors:  Pelle G Hansen; Mathilde Schilling; Mia S Malthesen
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 2.341

10.  Eat Well to Fight Obesity… and Save Water: The Water Footprint of Different Diets and Caloric Intake and Its Relationship With Adiposity.

Authors:  Mariana Lares-Michel; Fatima Ezzahra Housni; Virginia Gabriela Aguilera Cervantes; Presentación Carrillo; Rosa María Michel Nava; Claudia Llanes Cañedo
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2021-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.