Literature DB >> 26476213

Clinical Clues to Predict the Presence of Parafoveal Scotoma on Humphrey 10-2 Visual Field Using a Humphrey 24-2 Visual Field.

Hae-Young Lopilly Park1, Bo-Een Hwang1, Hye-Young Shin2, Chan Kee Park3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate characteristics related to the presence of parafoveal scotoma on Humphrey 10-2 visual field (VF) in early glaucoma patients.
DESIGN: Prospective, cross-sectional study.
METHODS: participants: Ninety-one eyes from 91 patients with glaucomatous optic neuropathy were prospectively tested with a 10-2 VF test. OBSERVATION PROCEDURES: Glaucoma patients were classified into eyes with or without parafoveal scotoma on 10-2 VF based on pattern deviation plot. The central 10 degree region of Humphrey 24-2 VF test comprised 12 points and any abnormal VF points depressed <5%, <2%, <1%, or <0.5% from the normal database on pattern deviation plot were analyzed. Various factors related to the presence of parafoveal scotoma on 10-2 VF were analyzed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Abnormal 24-2 VF points, macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness.
RESULTS: The presence of abnormal 24-2 VF points <0.5% was significantly different between eyes with and without parafoveal scotoma on 10-2 VF (P < .01). The minimum macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness (P = .04), any central 12 points depressed <0.5% on 24-2 VF (P < .01), and any central 12 points depressed <5% on 24-2 VF that spatially corresponds to macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thinning (P < 0.01) were related factors to the presence of parafoveal scotoma on 10-2 VF.
CONCLUSIONS: Glaucomatous eyes with any abnormal 24-2 VF points on the central 10 degree region that are depressed <0.5% or <5% that correlates to macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thinning should receive attention and be further evaluated with a 10-2 VF test.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26476213     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.10.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  22 in total

1.  Performance of the 10-2 and 24-2 Visual Field Tests for Detecting Central Visual Field Abnormalities in Glaucoma.

Authors:  Zhichao Wu; Felipe A Medeiros; Robert N Weinreb; Linda M Zangwill
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Association of Macular Visual Field Measurements With Glaucoma Staging Systems.

Authors:  Carlos Gustavo De Moraes; Ashley Sun; Ravivarn Jarukasetphon; Rashmi Rajshekhar; Lynn Shi; Dana M Blumberg; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Robert Ritch; Donald C Hood
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 7.389

3.  Comparing 10-2 and 24-2 Visual Fields for Detecting Progressive Central Visual Loss in Glaucoma Eyes with Early Central Abnormalities.

Authors:  Zhichao Wu; Felipe A Medeiros; Robert N Weinreb; Christopher A Girkin; Linda M Zangwill
Journal:  Ophthalmol Glaucoma       Date:  2019-01-14

Review 4.  Improving our understanding, and detection, of glaucomatous damage: An approach based upon optical coherence tomography (OCT).

Authors:  Donald C Hood
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 21.198

5.  Four Questions for Every Clinician Diagnosing and Monitoring Glaucoma.

Authors:  Donald C Hood; Carlos G De Moraes
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  The 24-2 Visual Field Guided Progression Analysis Can Miss the Progression of Glaucomatous Damage of the Macula Seen Using OCT.

Authors:  Donald C Hood; Sol La Bruna; Emmanouil Tsamis; Ari Leshno; Bruna Melchior; Jennifer Grossman; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Carlos Gustavo De Moraes
Journal:  Ophthalmol Glaucoma       Date:  2022-03-28

7.  Disc Hemorrhages Are Associated With the Presence and Progression of Glaucomatous Central Visual Field Defects.

Authors:  Aakriti G Shukla; Portia E Sirinek; C Gustavo De Moraes; Dana M Blumberg; George A Cioffi; Alon Skaat; Christopher A Girkin; Robert N Weinreb; Linda M Zangwill; Donald C Hood; Jeffrey M Liebmann
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  24-2 Visual Fields Miss Central Defects Shown on 10-2 Tests in Glaucoma Suspects, Ocular Hypertensives, and Early Glaucoma.

Authors:  C Gustavo De Moraes; Donald C Hood; Abinaya Thenappan; Christopher A Girkin; Felipe A Medeiros; Robert N Weinreb; Linda M Zangwill; Jeffrey M Liebmann
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  An Evaluation of a New 24-2 Metric for Detecting Early Central Glaucomatous Damage.

Authors:  Donald C Hood; Abinaya A Thenappan; Emmanouil Tsamis; Jeffrey M Liebmann; C Gustavo De Moraes
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 5.258

10.  Central Visual Field Defects in Patients with Distinct Glaucomatous Optic Disc Phenotypes.

Authors:  Eren Ekici; Sasan Moghimi; Huiyuan Hou; James Proudfoot; Linda M Zangwill; Jiun L Do; Won Hyuk Oh; Alireza Kamalipour; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Carlos Gustavo De Moraes; Christopher A Girkin; Nevin El-Nimri; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 5.258

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.