Literature DB >> 26476174

Intragastric pH and pressure profiles after intake of the high-caloric, high-fat meal as used for food effect studies.

M Koziolek1, F Schneider1, M Grimm1, Chr Modeβ2, A Seekamp2, T Roustom2, W Siegmund2, W Weitschies3.   

Abstract

The intraluminal conditions of the fed stomach are critical for drug release from solid oral dosage forms and thus, often associated with the occurrence of food effects on oral bioavailability. In this study, intragastric pH and pressure profiles present after the ingestion of the high-caloric, high-fat (964 kcal) FDA standard breakfast were investigated in 19 healthy human subjects by using the telemetric SmartPill® capsule system (26 × 13 mm). Since the gastric emptying of such large non-digestible objects is typically accomplished by the migrating motor complex phase III activity, the time required for recurrence of fasted state motility determined the gastric emptying time (GET). Following the diet recommendations of the FDA guidance on food effect studies, the mean GET of the telemetric motility capsule was 15.3 ± 4.7 h. Thus, the high caloric value of the standard breakfast impeded gastric emptying before lunch in 18 out of 19 subjects. During its gastric transit, the capsule was exposed to highly dynamic conditions in terms of pH and pressure, which were mainly dependent on further meal and liquid intake, as well as the intragastric capsule deposition behavior. Maximum pH values in the stomach were measured immediately after capsule intake. The median pH value of the 5 min period after capsule ingestion ranged between pH 3.3 and 5.3. Subsequently, the pH decreased relatively constantly and reached minimum values of pH 0-1 after approximately 4 h. The maximum pressure within the stomach amounted to 293 ± 109 mbar and was clearly higher than the maximum pressure measured at the ileocaecal junction (60 ± 35 mbar). The physiological data on the intraluminal conditions within the fed stomach generated in this study will hopefully contribute to a better understanding of food effects on oral drug product performance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FDA standard breakfast; Fed state; Food effect; Gastrointestinal pH; Oral drug delivery; Pressure; Solid oral dosage form; Transit time

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26476174     DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.10.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Control Release        ISSN: 0168-3659            Impact factor:   9.776


  19 in total

1.  INFOGEST static in vitro simulation of gastrointestinal food digestion.

Authors:  André Brodkorb; Lotti Egger; Marie Alminger; Paula Alvito; Ricardo Assunção; Simon Ballance; Torsten Bohn; Claire Bourlieu-Lacanal; Rachel Boutrou; Frédéric Carrière; Alfonso Clemente; Milena Corredig; Didier Dupont; Claire Dufour; Cathrina Edwards; Matt Golding; Sibel Karakaya; Bente Kirkhus; Steven Le Feunteun; Uri Lesmes; Adam Macierzanka; Alan R Mackie; Carla Martins; Sébastien Marze; David Julian McClements; Olivia Ménard; Mans Minekus; Reto Portmann; Cláudia N Santos; Isabelle Souchon; R Paul Singh; Gerd E Vegarud; Martin S J Wickham; Werner Weitschies; Isidra Recio
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 2.  Lipids in the Stomach - Implications for the Evaluation of Food Effects on Oral Drug Absorption.

Authors:  Mirko Koziolek; Frédéric Carrière; Christopher J H Porter
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  An Advanced Bioreactor Simulating Dynamic Physiological Conditions in the Human Ascending Colon: MimiCol3.

Authors:  Regine Beeck; Annemarie Dols; Felix Schneider; Dariah-Sohreh Seradj; Julius Krause; Philipp Schick; Werner Weitschies
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 6.525

Review 4.  Application of In Vivo Imaging Techniques and Diagnostic Tools in Oral Drug Delivery Research.

Authors:  Stefan Senekowitsch; Philipp Schick; Bertil Abrahamsson; Patrick Augustijns; Thomas Gießmann; Hans Lennernäs; Christophe Matthys; Luca Marciani; Xavier Pepin; Alan Perkins; Maximilian Feldmüller; Sarah Sulaiman; Werner Weitschies; Clive G Wilson; Maura Corsetti; Mirko Koziolek
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 6.525

5.  Design and Evaluation of Two-Step Biorelevant Dissolution Methods for Docetaxel Oral Formulations.

Authors:  Brijesh Shah; Xiaowei Dong
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 4.026

6.  Effect of Elevated pH on the Commercial Enteric-Coated Omeprazole Pellets Resistance: Patent Review and Multisource Generics Comparison.

Authors:  Valentyn Mohylyuk; Anna Yerkhova; Marina Katynska; Vitaliy Sirko; Kavil Patel
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 3.246

Review 7.  Development of In Vitro Dissolution Testing Methods to Simulate Fed Conditions for Immediate Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms.

Authors:  Timothy R Lex; Jason D Rodriguez; Lei Zhang; Wenlei Jiang; Zongming Gao
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 4.009

8.  In Vitro and In Vivo Modeling of Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose (HPMC) Matrix Tablet Erosion Under Fasting and Postprandial Status.

Authors:  Benjamin Guiastrennec; Erik Söderlind; Sara Richardson; Alexandra Peric; Martin Bergstrand
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 4.200

9.  Use of Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling for Predicting Drug-Food Interactions: Recommendations for Improving Predictive Performance of Low Confidence Food Effect Models.

Authors:  Christian Wagner; Filippos Kesisoglou; Xavier J H Pepin; Neil Parrott; Arian Emami Riedmaier
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 4.009

10.  Identification of beagle food taking patterns and protocol for food effects evaluation on bioavailability.

Authors:  Guoqing Zhang; Caifen Wang; Li Wu; Jian Xu; Xiaoxiao Hu; Shailendra Shakya; Yuanzhi He; Xiaohong Ren; Weidong Chen; Jiwen Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.