Literature DB >> 26476075

Increasing the Therapeutic Ratio of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy by Individualized Isotoxic Dose Prescription.

Jaap D Zindler1, Charles R Thomas2, Stephen M Hahn2, Aswin L Hoffmann2, Esther G C Troost2, Philippe Lambin2.   

Abstract

To obtain a favorable tradeoff between treatment benefits and morbidity ("therapeutic ratio"), radiotherapy (RT) dose is prescribed according to the tumor volume, with the goal of controlling the disease while respecting normal tissue tolerance levels. We propose a new paradigm for tumor dose prescription in stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) based on organ-at-risk (OAR) tolerance levels called isotoxic dose prescription (IDP), which is derived from experiences and limitations of conventionally fractionated radiotherapy. With IDP, the radiation dose is prescribed based on the predefined level of normal tissue complication probability of a nearby dose-limiting OAR at a prespecified dose-volume constraint. Simultaneously, the prescribed total tumor dose (TTD) is maximized to the technically highest achievable level in order to increase the local tumor control probability (TCP). IDP is especially relevant for tumors located at eloquent locations or for large tumors in which severe toxicity has been described. IDP will result in a lower RT dose or a treatment scheduled with more fractions if the OAR tolerance level is exceeded, and potential dose escalation occurs when the OAR tolerance level allows it and when it is expected to be beneficial (if TCP < 90%). For patients with small tumors at noneloquent sites, the current SABR dose prescription already results in high rates of local control at low toxicity rates. In this review, the concept of IDP is described in the context of SABR.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26476075     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djv305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  12 in total

Review 1.  DNA Repair: Translation to the Clinic.

Authors:  E V Minten; D S Yu
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 4.126

Review 2.  [Melanoma brain metastases : Treatment options].

Authors:  R Rauschenberg; G Tabatabai; E G C Troost; M Garzarolli; S Beissert; F Meier
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 0.751

3.  A Dutch phase III randomized multicenter trial: whole brain radiotherapy versus stereotactic radiotherapy for 4-10 brain metastases.

Authors:  Dianne Hartgerink; Anna Bruynzeel; Danielle Eekers; Ans Swinnen; Coen Hurkmans; Ruud Wiggenraad; Annemarie Swaak-Kragten; Edith Dieleman; Peter-Paul van der Toorn; Bing Oei; Lieneke van Veelen; Joost Verhoeff; Frank Lagerwaard; Dirk de Ruysscher; Philippe Lambin; Jaap Zindler
Journal:  Neurooncol Adv       Date:  2021-02-01

4.  Clinical development of new drug-radiotherapy combinations.

Authors:  Ricky A Sharma; Ruth Plummer; Julie K Stock; Tessa A Greenhalgh; Ozlem Ataman; Stephen Kelly; Robert Clay; Richard A Adams; Richard D Baird; Lucinda Billingham; Sarah R Brown; Sean Buckland; Helen Bulbeck; Anthony J Chalmers; Glen Clack; Aaron N Cranston; Lars Damstrup; Roberta Ferraldeschi; Martin D Forster; Julian Golec; Russell M Hagan; Emma Hall; Axel-R Hanauske; Kevin J Harrington; Tom Haswell; Maria A Hawkins; Tim Illidge; Hazel Jones; Andrew S Kennedy; Fiona McDonald; Thorsten Melcher; James P B O'Connor; John R Pollard; Mark P Saunders; David Sebag-Montefiore; Melanie Smitt; John Staffurth; Ian J Stratford; Stephen R Wedge
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 5.  Metabolic Rewiring in Radiation Oncology Toward Improving the Therapeutic Ratio.

Authors:  Marike W van Gisbergen; Emma Zwilling; Ludwig J Dubois
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Individual isotoxic radiation dose escalation based on V20 and advanced technologies benefits unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy: long term follow-up.

Authors:  Ming Liu; Zhongtang Wang; Tao Zhou; Antang Zhou; Qian Zhao; Hongsheng Li; Hongfu Sun; Wei Huang; BaoSheng Li
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-03-16

Review 7.  Stereotactic Radiosurgery in the Management of Patients With Brain Metastases of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Indications, Decision Tools and Future Directions.

Authors:  Dianne Hartgerink; Britt van der Heijden; Dirk De Ruysscher; Alida Postma; Linda Ackermans; Ann Hoeben; Monique Anten; Philippe Lambin; Karin Terhaag; Arthur Jochems; Andre Dekker; Janna Schoenmaekers; Lizza Hendriks; Jaap Zindler
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Improved effectiveness of stereotactic radiosurgery in large brain metastases by individualized isotoxic dose prescription: an in silico study.

Authors:  Jaap D Zindler; Jacqueline Schiffelers; Philippe Lambin; Aswin L Hoffmann
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 3.621

9.  Improved dosimetric accuracy with semi-automatic contour propagation of organs-at-risk in glioblastoma patients undergoing chemoradiation.

Authors:  Sangjune Lee; James Stewart; Young Lee; Sten Myrehaug; Arjun Sahgal; Mark Ruschin; Chia-Lin Tseng
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 10.  Gene Therapy for Systemic or Organ Specific Delivery of Manganese Superoxide Dismutase.

Authors:  Joel S Greenberger; Amitava Mukherjee; Michael W Epperly
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.