A Belletti1, M L Castro2, S Silvetti1, T Greco3, G Biondi-Zoccai4, L Pasin1, A Zangrillo5, G Landoni6. 1. Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, via Olgettina 60, Milan 20132, Italy. 2. Anaesthesiology Department, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Central, EPE - Hospital de Santa Marta, Rua de Santa Marta 50, Lisbon 1169-024, Portugal. 3. Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, via Olgettina 60, Milan 20132, Italy Laboratorio di Statistica Medica, Biometria ed Epidemiologia "G. A. Maccacaro", Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche e di Comunità, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, Milan 20122, Italy. 4. Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Corso della Repubblica 79, Latina 04100, Italy. 5. Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, via Olgettina 60, Milan 20132, Italy Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, via Olgettina 58, Milan 20132, Italy. 6. Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, via Olgettina 60, Milan 20132, Italy Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, via Olgettina 58, Milan 20132, Italy landoni.giovanni@hsr.it.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Inotropes and vasopressors are frequently administered to critically ill patients in order to improve haemodynamic function and restore adequate organ perfusion. However, some studies have suggested a possible association between inotrope administration and increased mortality. We therefore performed a meta-analysis of randomized trials published in the last 20 yr to investigate the effect of these drugs on mortality. METHODS: BioMedCentral, PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register were searched (all updated April 8th, 2015). Inclusion criteria were: random allocation to treatment, at least one group receiving an inotropic or vasopressor drug compared with at least one group receiving a non-inotropic/vasopressor treatment, study published after 1st January 1994, and systemic drug administration. Exclusion criteria were overlapping populations, studies published as abstract only, crossover studies, paediatric studies and lack of data on mortality. RESULTS: A total of 28 280 patients from 177 trials were included. Overall, pooled estimates showed no difference in mortality between the group receiving inotropes/vasopressors and the control group [4255/14 036 (31.7%) vs. 4277/14 244 (31.8%), risk ratio=0.98 (0.96-1.01), P for effect=0.23, P for heterogeneity=0.30, I2=6%]. A reduction in mortality was associated with inotrope/vasopressor therapy use in settings of vasoplegic syndromes, sepsis and cardiac surgery. Levosimendan was the only drug associated with improvement in survival. Subgroup analysis did not identify any groups with increased mortality associated with inotrope/vasopressor therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review found that inotrope/vasopressor therapy is not associated with differences in mortality in the overall population and in the majority of subsettings.
BACKGROUND: Inotropes and vasopressors are frequently administered to critically ill patients in order to improve haemodynamic function and restore adequate organ perfusion. However, some studies have suggested a possible association between inotrope administration and increased mortality. We therefore performed a meta-analysis of randomized trials published in the last 20 yr to investigate the effect of these drugs on mortality. METHODS: BioMedCentral, PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register were searched (all updated April 8th, 2015). Inclusion criteria were: random allocation to treatment, at least one group receiving an inotropic or vasopressor drug compared with at least one group receiving a non-inotropic/vasopressor treatment, study published after 1st January 1994, and systemic drug administration. Exclusion criteria were overlapping populations, studies published as abstract only, crossover studies, paediatric studies and lack of data on mortality. RESULTS: A total of 28 280 patients from 177 trials were included. Overall, pooled estimates showed no difference in mortality between the group receiving inotropes/vasopressors and the control group [4255/14 036 (31.7%) vs. 4277/14 244 (31.8%), risk ratio=0.98 (0.96-1.01), P for effect=0.23, P for heterogeneity=0.30, I2=6%]. A reduction in mortality was associated with inotrope/vasopressor therapy use in settings of vasoplegic syndromes, sepsis and cardiac surgery. Levosimendan was the only drug associated with improvement in survival. Subgroup analysis did not identify any groups with increased mortality associated with inotrope/vasopressor therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review found that inotrope/vasopressor therapy is not associated with differences in mortality in the overall population and in the majority of subsettings.
Authors: Archana G Venakatesh; Johann J Mathew; Scott Coleman; Longqiu Yang; Geoffrey L Liu; Marilyn M Li; Henry Liu Journal: J Biomed Res Date: 2018-11-18
Authors: Konstantin Uhlig; Ljupcho Efremov; Jörn Tongers; Stefan Frantz; Rafael Mikolajczyk; Daniel Sedding; Julia Schumann Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2020-11-05